Estimating Sepsis Incidence Using Administrative Data and Clinical Medical Record Review.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2023
01 08 2023
Historique:
medline:
31
8
2023
pubmed:
29
8
2023
entrez:
29
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the large health burden, reliable data on sepsis epidemiology are lacking; studies using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-coded hospital discharge diagnosis for sepsis identification suffer from limited sensitivity. Also, ICD data do not allow investigation of underlying pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. To generate reliable epidemiological estimates by linking data from a population-based database to a reference standard of clinical medical record review. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using a population-based administrative database including all acute care hospitals of the Scania region in Sweden in 2019 and 2020 to identify hospital-treated sepsis cases by ICD codes. From this database, clinical medical records were also selected for review within 6 strata defined by ICD discharge diagnosis (both with and without sepsis diagnosis). Data were analyzed from April to October 2022. Hospital and population incidences of sepsis, case fatality, antimicrobial resistance, and temporal dynamics due to COVID-19 were assessed, as well as validity of ICD-10 case identification methods compared with the reference standard of clinical medical record review. Out of 295 531 hospitalizations in 2019 in the Scania region of Sweden, 997 patient medical records were reviewed, among which 457 had sepsis according to clinical criteria. Of the patients with clinical sepsis, 232 (51%) were female, and 357 (78%) had at least 1 comorbidity. The median (IQR) age of the cohort was 76 (67-85) years. The incidence of sepsis in hospitalized patients according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) criteria in 2019 was 4.1% (95% CI, 3.6-4.5) by medical record review. This corresponds to an annual incidence rate of 747 (95% CI, 663-832) patients with sepsis per 100 000 population. No significant increase in sepsis during the COVID-19 pandemic nor a decrease in sepsis incidence when excluding COVID-19 sepsis was observed. Few sepsis cases caused by pathogens with antimicrobial resistance were found. The validity of ICD-10-based case identification in administrative data was low. In this cohort study of sepsis epidemiology, sepsis was a considerable burden to public health in Sweden. Supplying administrative data with information from clinical medical records can help to generate reliable data on sepsis epidemiology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37642964
pii: 2808870
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31168
pmc: PMC10466163
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Infective Agents
0
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2331168Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 1;60(1):88-95
pubmed: 25258352
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):759-765
pubmed: 28234754
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7
pubmed: 17938396
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;60(2):155-62
pubmed: 17208121
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jun;29(6):933-938
pubmed: 12734651
Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):945-53
pubmed: 23385099
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211
pubmed: 31954465
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 29;13(11):e1002184
pubmed: 27898664
Crit Care. 2015 Feb 16;19:42
pubmed: 25879803
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Nov 09;4(11):e0788
pubmed: 36382338
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1552-1562
pubmed: 32572531
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Oct 1;45(10):1091-1100
pubmed: 28602274
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 23;5(12):e009487
pubmed: 26700284
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Feb;44(1):173-184
pubmed: 36646093
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 01;378(9):797-808
pubmed: 29347874
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1167-74
pubmed: 23442987
Infect Dis (Lond). 2019 Jan;51(1):38-49
pubmed: 30460859
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Mar;46(3):599-602
pubmed: 35496
Crit Care Explor. 2022 May 17;4(5):e0697
pubmed: 35620771
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249
pubmed: 28903154
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Dec;24(18):1958-1966
pubmed: 28764553
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jun;3(6):e360-e370
pubmed: 34045002
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;19(1):56-66
pubmed: 30409683
Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 1;49(12):2042-2057
pubmed: 34259663
J Neurosurg. 1988 Nov;69(5):699-706
pubmed: 3054013
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 06;19:139
pubmed: 25887596
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74
pubmed: 26903335
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1442-9
pubmed: 20400903
Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):e272-e283
pubmed: 34406170
Lakartidningen. 2015 Sep 14;112:
pubmed: 26371482