Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Journal
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
ISSN: 1866-0452
Titre abrégé: Dtsch Arztebl Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101475967
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 10 2023
20 10 2023
Historique:
received:
13
03
2023
revised:
04
08
2023
accepted:
04
08
2023
medline:
17
11
2023
pubmed:
1
9
2023
entrez:
1
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Around the world, survival rates after cardiac arrest range between <14% for in-hospital (IHCA) and <10% for outof- hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This situation could potentially be improved by using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), i.e. by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). A selective literature search of Pubmed and Embase using the searching string ((ECMO) OR (ECLS)) AND (ECPR)) was carried out in February 2023 to prepare an up-to-date review of published trials comparing the outcomes of ECPR with those of conventional CPR. Out of 573 initial results, 12 studies were included in this review, among them three randomized controlled trials comparing ECPR with CPR, involving a total of 420 patients. The survival rates for ECPR ranged from 20% to 43% for OHCA and 20% to 30.4% for IHCA. Most of the publications were associated with a high degree of bias and a low level of evidence. ECPR can potentially improve survival rates after cardiac arrest compared to conventional CPR when used in experienced, high-volume centers in highly selected patients (young age, initial shockable rhythm, witnessed cardiac arrest, therapy-refractory high-quality CPR). No general recommendation for the use of ECPR can be issued at present.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Around the world, survival rates after cardiac arrest range between <14% for in-hospital (IHCA) and <10% for outof- hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This situation could potentially be improved by using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), i.e. by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).
METHODS
A selective literature search of Pubmed and Embase using the searching string ((ECMO) OR (ECLS)) AND (ECPR)) was carried out in February 2023 to prepare an up-to-date review of published trials comparing the outcomes of ECPR with those of conventional CPR.
RESULTS
Out of 573 initial results, 12 studies were included in this review, among them three randomized controlled trials comparing ECPR with CPR, involving a total of 420 patients. The survival rates for ECPR ranged from 20% to 43% for OHCA and 20% to 30.4% for IHCA. Most of the publications were associated with a high degree of bias and a low level of evidence.
CONCLUSION
ECPR can potentially improve survival rates after cardiac arrest compared to conventional CPR when used in experienced, high-volume centers in highly selected patients (young age, initial shockable rhythm, witnessed cardiac arrest, therapy-refractory high-quality CPR). No general recommendation for the use of ECPR can be issued at present.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37656466
pii: arztebl.m2023.0189
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0189
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
703-710Références
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):973-982
pubmed: 32052069
Resusc Plus. 2022 Apr 06;10:100230
pubmed: 35434669
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):717-729
pubmed: 29450594
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):610-6
pubmed: 24210621
Circulation. 2020 Mar 17;141(11):877-886
pubmed: 31896278
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 May 05;59:101988
pubmed: 37197707
Resuscitation. 2022 Nov;180:111-120
pubmed: 36183812
Circulation. 2004 Nov 23;110(21):3385-97
pubmed: 15557386
Circulation. 2019 Aug 27;140(9):e517-e542
pubmed: 31291775
Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(5):826-830
pubmed: 34276249
Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):e964-72
pubmed: 27340754
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):51
pubmed: 28500585
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 22;24(1):61
pubmed: 32087741
Lancet. 2008 Aug 16;372(9638):554-61
pubmed: 18603291
JAMA. 2022 Feb 22;327(8):737-747
pubmed: 35191923
Perfusion. 2023 Mar;38(2):436-439
pubmed: 36416680
Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1807-1816
pubmed: 33197396
Resuscitation. 2017 Aug;117:109-117
pubmed: 28414164
Resuscitation. 2018 Nov;132:90-100
pubmed: 30213495
Anaesthesist. 2022 May;71(5):392-399
pubmed: 34694422
Ann Emerg Med. 1981 Mar;10(3):135-7
pubmed: 7469152
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Oct;31(5):1836-1846
pubmed: 28625752
Artif Organs. 2023 May;47(5):806-816
pubmed: 36929354
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;11(9):e004905
pubmed: 30354364
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 26;388(4):299-309
pubmed: 36720132
Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep;36(9):2529-35
pubmed: 18679121
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb 14;15(3):237-247
pubmed: 35033471
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1922-1934
pubmed: 27647331
Resuscitation. 2016 Feb;99:26-32
pubmed: 26683472
Resuscitation. 2023 Jan;182:109665
pubmed: 36521684
Resuscitation. 2017 Mar;112:34-40
pubmed: 27993632
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 1;41(21):1961-1971
pubmed: 31670793
Resuscitation. 2017 Oct;119:56-62
pubmed: 28789990
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):626-31
pubmed: 21550582
Perfusion. 2023 Mar;38(2):292-298
pubmed: 34628988
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):
pubmed: 27412906
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3424-30
pubmed: 23664696
Crit Care. 2017 Jun 22;21(1):157
pubmed: 28637497