Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for undergraduate medical education - development and exploration of social validity.
Development
Entrustable professional activities
Social validity
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Sep 2023
04 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
09
03
2023
accepted:
28
08
2023
medline:
6
9
2023
pubmed:
5
9
2023
entrez:
4
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The development of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as a framework for work-based training and assessment in undergraduate medical education has become popular. EPAs are defined as units of a professional activity requiring adequate knowledge, skills, and attitudes, with a recognized output of professional labor, independently executable within a time frame, observable and measurable in its process and outcome, and reflecting one or more competencies. Before a new framework is implemented in a specific context, it is valuable to explore social validity, that is, the acceptability by relevant stakeholders. The aim of our work was to define Core EPAs for undergraduate medical education and further explore the social validity of the constructs. In a nationwide collaboration, EPAs were developed using a modified Delphi procedure and validated according to EQual by a group consisting of teachers nominated from each of the seven Swedish medical schools, two student representatives, and an educational developer (n = 16). In the next step, social validity was explored in a nationwide survey. The survey introduced the suggested EPAs. For each EPA, the importance of the EPA was rated, as was the rater's perception of the present graduates' required level of supervision when performing the activity. Free-text comments were also included and analyzed. Ten Core EPAs were defined and validated. The validation scores for EQual ranged from 4.1 to 4.9. The nationwide survey had 473 responders. All activities were rated as "important" by most responders, ranging from 54 to 96%. When asked how independent current graduates were in performing the ten activities, 6 to 35% reported "independent". The three themes of the free text comments were: 'relevant target areas and content'; 'definition of the activities'; and 'clinical practice and learning'. Ten Core EPAs were defined and assessed as relevant for Swedish undergraduate medical education. There was a consistent gap between the perceived importance and the certainty that the students could perform these professional activities independently at the time of graduation. These results indicate that the ten EPAs may have a role in undergraduate education by creating clarity for all stakeholders.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The development of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as a framework for work-based training and assessment in undergraduate medical education has become popular. EPAs are defined as units of a professional activity requiring adequate knowledge, skills, and attitudes, with a recognized output of professional labor, independently executable within a time frame, observable and measurable in its process and outcome, and reflecting one or more competencies. Before a new framework is implemented in a specific context, it is valuable to explore social validity, that is, the acceptability by relevant stakeholders.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
The aim of our work was to define Core EPAs for undergraduate medical education and further explore the social validity of the constructs.
METHOD AND MATERIAL
METHODS
In a nationwide collaboration, EPAs were developed using a modified Delphi procedure and validated according to EQual by a group consisting of teachers nominated from each of the seven Swedish medical schools, two student representatives, and an educational developer (n = 16). In the next step, social validity was explored in a nationwide survey. The survey introduced the suggested EPAs. For each EPA, the importance of the EPA was rated, as was the rater's perception of the present graduates' required level of supervision when performing the activity. Free-text comments were also included and analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ten Core EPAs were defined and validated. The validation scores for EQual ranged from 4.1 to 4.9. The nationwide survey had 473 responders. All activities were rated as "important" by most responders, ranging from 54 to 96%. When asked how independent current graduates were in performing the ten activities, 6 to 35% reported "independent". The three themes of the free text comments were: 'relevant target areas and content'; 'definition of the activities'; and 'clinical practice and learning'.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Ten Core EPAs were defined and assessed as relevant for Swedish undergraduate medical education. There was a consistent gap between the perceived importance and the certainty that the students could perform these professional activities independently at the time of graduation. These results indicate that the ten EPAs may have a role in undergraduate education by creating clarity for all stakeholders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37667366
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04621-6
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04621-6
pmc: PMC10478490
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
635Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Med Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):234-249
pubmed: 30609093
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):172
pubmed: 33740970
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):774-779
pubmed: 28557941
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Jun;67(3):308-19
pubmed: 10369051
Med Educ. 2021 Sep;55(9):1011-1032
pubmed: 33884655
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: P):S110-S117
pubmed: 29065031
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 2;18(1):87
pubmed: 29716574
Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7S):S50-S55
pubmed: 34183602
Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7S):S14-S21
pubmed: 34183597
Acad Med. 2021 Feb 1;96(2):193-198
pubmed: 33031119
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1):6-7
pubmed: 24404218
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1491-1498
pubmed: 28678098
Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983-1002
pubmed: 26172347
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Dec 1;235(6):940-951
pubmed: 36102502
Med Educ. 2005 Dec;39(12):1176-7
pubmed: 16313574
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):765-770
pubmed: 28557937
J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Summer;11(2):203-14
pubmed: 16795590
Med Teach. 2018 May;40(5):506-513
pubmed: 29468913
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Feb 15;36(1):Doc5
pubmed: 30828605
Med Teach. 2010;32(4):302-4
pubmed: 20353326
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Mar 26;5(2):
pubmed: 28970429
Acad Med. 2019 Jul;94(7):1002-1009
pubmed: 30973365
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 14769454
Med Teach. 2021 Oct;43(10):1106-1114
pubmed: 33167763
Med Teach. 2023 Nov;45(11):1203-1213
pubmed: 36706225
Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Feb 01;146:w14270
pubmed: 26829005
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):431-6
pubmed: 25470310
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1755-1762
pubmed: 32433310
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 May;27(2):491-499
pubmed: 35226240
Acad Med. 2019 Jul;94(7):1040-1049
pubmed: 30946134