Inhibitor Library Screening of SH2 Domains Through Denaturation-Based Assays.
Cellular thermal shift assay
Fluorescence
Inhibitor
Phosphopeptide
SH2 domain
Thermal shift assay
Journal
Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
medline:
6
9
2023
pubmed:
5
9
2023
entrez:
5
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Screening of inhibitor libraries for candidate ligands is an important step in the drug discovery process. Thermal denaturation-based screening strategies are built on the premise that a protein-ligand complex has an altered stability profile compared to the protein alone. As such, these assays provide an accessible and rapid methodology for stratifying ligands that directly engage with the protein target of interest. Here, we describe three denaturation-based strategies for examining protein-inhibitor binding, in the context of SH2 domains. This includes conventional dye-based Thermal Shift Assays (TSA), nonconventional labeled ligand-based TSA, and Cellular Thermal Shift Assays (CETSA). Conventional dye-based TSA reports on the fluorescence of an external hydrophobic dye as it interacts with heat-exposed nonpolar protein surfaces as the temperature is incrementally increased. By contrast, nonconventional-labeled ligand TSA involves a fluorescence-tagged probe (phosphopeptide for SH2 domains) that is quenched as it dissociates from the protein during the denaturation process. CETSA involves monitoring the presence of the protein via Western blotting as the temperature is increased. In all three approaches, performing the assay in the presence of a candidate ligand can alter the melting profile of the protein. These assays offer primary screening tools to examine SH2 domain inhibitors libraries with varying chemical motifs, and a subset of the advantages and limitations of each approach is also discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37668976
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3393-9_11
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ligands
0
Fluorescent Dyes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
213-223Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Niesen FH, Berglund H, Vedadi M (2007) The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability. Nat Protoc 2:2212–2221
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.321
pubmed: 17853878
Kranz JK, Schalk-Hihi C (2011) Protein thermal shifts to identify low molecular weight fragments. Methods Enzymol 493:277–298
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381274-2.00011-X
pubmed: 21371595
Gao K, Oerlemans R, Groves MR (2020) Theory and applications of differential scanning fluorimetry in early-stage drug discovery. Biophys Rev 12(1):85–104
doi: 10.1007/s12551-020-00619-2
pubmed: 32006251
pmcid: 7040159
Redhead M, Satchell R, McCarthy C et al (2017) Thermal shift as an entropy-driven effect. Biochemistry 56:6187–6199
doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00860
pubmed: 29111685
de Araujo ED, Orlova A, Neubauer HA et al (2019) Structural implications of STAT3 and STAT5 SH2 domain mutations. Cancers (Basel) 11:1757
doi: 10.3390/cancers11111757
pubmed: 31717342
Orlova A, Wagner C, De Araujo ED et al (2019) Direct targeting options for STAT3 and STAT5 in cancer. Cancers (Basel) 11:1930
doi: 10.3390/cancers11121930
pubmed: 31817042
de Araujo ED, Manaswiyoungkul P, Erdogan F et al (2019) A functional in vitro assay for screening inhibitors of STAT5B phosphorylation. J Pharm Biomed Anal 162:60–65
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.08.036
pubmed: 30223143
De Araujo ED, Kanelis V (2014) Successful development and use of a thermodynamic stability screen for optimizing the yield of nucleotide binding domains. Protein Expr Purif 103:38–47
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2014.08.006
pubmed: 25153533
Kosack L, Wingelhofer B, Popa A et al (2019) The ERBB-STAT3 axis drives Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease. Cancer Cell 35:125–139.e9
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.11.018
pubmed: 30645971
pmcid: 6335503
Molina DM, Jafari R, Ignatushchenko M et al (2013) Monitoring drug target engagement in cells and tissues using the cellular thermal shift assay. Science (80- ) 341:84–87
doi: 10.1126/science.1233606
Jafari R, Almqvist H, Axelsson H et al (2014) The cellular thermal shift assay for evaluating drug target interactions in cells. Nat Protoc 9:2100–2122
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.138
pubmed: 25101824
Mahmood T, Yang PC (2012) Western blot: technique, theory, and trouble shooting. N Am J Med Sci 4:429–434
doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.100998
pubmed: 23050259
pmcid: 3456489
Delport A, Hewer R (2022) A superior loading control for the cellular thermal shift assay. Sci Rep 12:6672
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10653-7
pubmed: 35461337
pmcid: 9035151
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
pubmed: 22930834
pmcid: 5554542
Good NE, Winget GD, Winter W et al (1966) Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research. Biochemistry 5:467–477
doi: 10.1021/bi00866a011
pubmed: 5942950