Substrate-dependent strategies to mitigate sulfate inhibition on microbial reductive dechlorination of polychlorinated biphenyls.

Sulfate widely co-exists with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at various concentrations in the subsurface environment. Previous studies have suggested that sulfate often hampers microbial degradation of aliphatic chlorinated solvents such as chloroethenes. However, the impact of sulfate on microbial reductive dechlorination of aromatic PCBs and the underlying mechanisms have received limited attention. Likewise, strategies to mitigate such inhibition remain scarce. Here we found that the mechanisms and mitigation strategies of sulfate inhibition on PCB dechlorination were substrate-dependent. Under electron donor-limiting conditions, even a low concentration of sulfate (2 mM) resulted in a decreased PCB dechlorination rate by 88.7% in a co-culture comprising Dehalococcoides mccartyi CG1 and the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans F1, an inhibition which was attributed to the competition for electron donor between sulfate reduction and PCB dechlorination. As expected, re-amendment of 5 mM lactate effectively re-initiated PCB dechlorination. However, in the presence of a higher concentration of sulfate (5 mM), the PCB dechlorination rate in the co-culture was 77.7% lower than in the control, even with excessive electron donor supply. This inhibition was linked to high concentration of sulfide (∼5 mM) produced from sulfate reduction, as suggested by high availability of electron donor, recovery of dechlorination activity after removal of sulfide, and negligible influence of sulfate on PCB dechlorination in the axenic culture of D. mccartyi CG1. Indeed, sulfide (>5 mM) was found to directly suppress expression of PCB-dechlorinating reductive dehalogenase gene. The highest transcriptional level of pcbA1 was 2.9 ± 0.3 transcripts·cell

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.