Investigating the interactions of endornaviruses with each other and with other viruses in common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris.

Persistent virus Viral cross-protection Viral mutualism Viral synergy

Journal

Virology journal
ISSN: 1743-422X
Titre abrégé: Virol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101231645

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 09 2023
Historique:
received: 17 07 2023
accepted: 13 09 2023
medline: 25 9 2023
pubmed: 22 9 2023
entrez: 22 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Plant viruses of the genus Alphaendornavirus are transmitted solely via seed and pollen and generally cause no apparent disease. It has been conjectured that certain plant endornaviruses may confer advantages on their hosts through improved performance (e.g., seed yield) or resilience to abiotic or biotic insult. We recently characterised nine common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties that harboured either Phaseolus vulgaris endornavirus (PvEV1) alone, or PvEV1 in combination with PvEV2 or PvEV1 in combination with PvEV2 and PvEV3. Here, we investigated the interactions of these endornaviruses with each other, and with three infectious pathogenic viruses: cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), bean common mosaic virus (BCMV), and bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV). In lines harbouring PvEV1, PvEV1 and PvEV2, or PvEV1, PvEV2 plus PvEV3, the levels of PvEV1 and PvEV3 RNA were very similar between lines, although there were variations in PvEV2 RNA accumulation. In plants inoculated with infectious viruses, CMV, BCMV and BCMNV levels varied between lines, but this was most likely due to host genotype differences rather than to the presence or absence of endornaviruses. We tested the effects of endornaviruses on seed production and seedborne transmission of infectious pathogenic viruses but found no consistent relationship between the presence of endornaviruses and seed yield or protection from seedborne transmission of infectious pathogenic viruses. It was concluded that endornaviruses do not interfere with each other's accumulation. There appears to be no direct synergy or competition between infectious pathogenic viruses and endornaviruses, however, the effects of host genotype may obscure interactions between endornaviruses and infectious viruses. There is no consistent effect of endornaviruses on seed yield or susceptibility to seedborne transmission of other viruses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Plant viruses of the genus Alphaendornavirus are transmitted solely via seed and pollen and generally cause no apparent disease. It has been conjectured that certain plant endornaviruses may confer advantages on their hosts through improved performance (e.g., seed yield) or resilience to abiotic or biotic insult. We recently characterised nine common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties that harboured either Phaseolus vulgaris endornavirus (PvEV1) alone, or PvEV1 in combination with PvEV2 or PvEV1 in combination with PvEV2 and PvEV3. Here, we investigated the interactions of these endornaviruses with each other, and with three infectious pathogenic viruses: cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), bean common mosaic virus (BCMV), and bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV).
RESULTS
In lines harbouring PvEV1, PvEV1 and PvEV2, or PvEV1, PvEV2 plus PvEV3, the levels of PvEV1 and PvEV3 RNA were very similar between lines, although there were variations in PvEV2 RNA accumulation. In plants inoculated with infectious viruses, CMV, BCMV and BCMNV levels varied between lines, but this was most likely due to host genotype differences rather than to the presence or absence of endornaviruses. We tested the effects of endornaviruses on seed production and seedborne transmission of infectious pathogenic viruses but found no consistent relationship between the presence of endornaviruses and seed yield or protection from seedborne transmission of infectious pathogenic viruses.
CONCLUSIONS
It was concluded that endornaviruses do not interfere with each other's accumulation. There appears to be no direct synergy or competition between infectious pathogenic viruses and endornaviruses, however, the effects of host genotype may obscure interactions between endornaviruses and infectious viruses. There is no consistent effect of endornaviruses on seed yield or susceptibility to seedborne transmission of other viruses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37737192
doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02184-y
pii: 10.1186/s12985-023-02184-y
pmc: PMC10515030
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA 63231-63-0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

216

Subventions

Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/P023223/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/J011762/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/W510609/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Phytopathology. 2023 Apr;113(4):616-625
pubmed: 36441873
Adv Virus Res. 2010;76:211-64
pubmed: 20965075
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Feb;9(2):99-108
pubmed: 21200397
Front Microbiol. 2018 Dec 07;9:2939
pubmed: 30581419
Plant Dis. 2018 Nov;102(11):2361-2370
pubmed: 30252625
Plant Physiol. 2010 May;153(1):52-65
pubmed: 20200069
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 27;365(1548):1899-905
pubmed: 20478885
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45
pubmed: 11328886
Adv Virus Res. 2023;115:159-203
pubmed: 37173065
Plant Cell Physiol. 2001 Feb;42(2):197-203
pubmed: 11230574
Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jul;31(4):713-9
pubmed: 8806402
Virus Res. 2015 Dec 2;210:169-77
pubmed: 26254084
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Nov;13(11):1266-70
pubmed: 11059494
J Gen Virol. 2011 Nov;92(Pt 11):2664-2673
pubmed: 21775578
Arch Virol. 2019 Jul;164(7):1863-1868
pubmed: 31065853
Arch Virol. 2016 Mar;161(3):741-3
pubmed: 26666441
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Mar 27;378(1873):20220005
pubmed: 36744567
Adv Virus Res. 2015;93:1-46
pubmed: 26111585
Annu Rev Virol. 2022 Sep 29;9(1):121-137
pubmed: 35567296
Plant Cell Physiol. 2010 Jan;51(1):58-67
pubmed: 19933266
Virus Genes. 2019 Apr;55(2):165-173
pubmed: 30644058
J Gen Virol. 2013 Jan;94(Pt 1):220-229
pubmed: 23015743
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178242
pubmed: 28542624
New Phytol. 2015 Apr;206(1):107-117
pubmed: 25866856
Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Apr;6(4):604-6
pubmed: 21673515
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 May;112(8):1452-7
pubmed: 16568285
Arch Virol. 2018 Apr;163(4):1051-1056
pubmed: 29307088
J Gen Virol. 2019 Aug;100(8):1204-1205
pubmed: 31184570
Virus Genes. 2023 Oct;59(5):741-751
pubmed: 37563541
Plant Cell Rep. 2012 May;31(5):827-38
pubmed: 22193338
J Gen Virol. 2000 Jan;81(Pt 1):227-33
pubmed: 10640562
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 31;10:1811
pubmed: 32082355
J Gen Virol. 1998 Oct;79 ( Pt 10):2349-58
pubmed: 9780039

Auteurs

Thomas J Brine (TJ)

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.

Satish B Viswanathan (SB)

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.

Alex M Murphy (AM)

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.

Adrienne E Pate (AE)

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.

Francis O Wamonje (FO)

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
Pest and Pathogen Ecology, National Institute of Agricultural Botany, East Malling, ME19 6BJ, UK.

John P Carr (JP)

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK. jpc1005@cam.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

Humans RNA, Circular Exosomes Cell Proliferation Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
DNA Methylation Humans DNA Animals Machine Learning
Cryoelectron Microscopy Models, Molecular RNA DNA Nucleic Acid Conformation
1.00
Nanoparticles Molecular Dynamics Simulation Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Lipids SARS-CoV-2

Classifications MeSH