Current landscape of hospital information systems in gynecology and obstetrics in Germany: a survey of the commission Digital Medicine of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Artificial intelligence
Digital health
Gynecology and obstetrics
Implementation
eHealth
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2023
12 2023
Historique:
received:
31
07
2023
accepted:
05
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
23
9
2023
entrez:
23
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hospital information systems (HIS) play a critical role in modern healthcare by facilitating the management and delivery of patient care services. We aimed to evaluate the current landscape of HIS in the specialty of gynecology and obstetrics in Germany. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed via the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics newsletter in December 2022. The questionnaire covered the domains baseline demographic information, satisfaction with daily use, satisfaction with implementation, and degree of digitization. Ninety-one participants completed the survey. Median age was 34 years; 67.4% (60 of 89) were female, and 32.6% (29 of 89) were male. Of the survey participants, 47.7% (42 of 88) were residents, 26.1% (23 of 91) senior physicians, and 9.1% (8 of 88) medical directors. The degree of digitization of clinical documentation is mainly mixed digital and paper-based (64.0%, 57 of 89) while 16.9% (15 of 89) operate mainly paper-based. The current HIS has been in use on average for 9 years. The median number of different software systems used in daily routine is 4. About 33.7% (30 of 89) would likely or very likely recommend their current HIS to a colleague. The current landscape of HIS in gynecology and obstetrics in Germany is characterized by a high heterogeneity of systems with low interoperability and long service life; thus, many healthcare professionals are not satisfied. There is both a need to enhance and an interest in modernizing the technological infrastructure to meet today's requirements for patient care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37740792
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07223-1
pii: 10.1007/s00404-023-07223-1
pmc: PMC10579143
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1823-1830Investigateurs
Harald Abele
(H)
Matthias Alexa
(M)
Jan Philipp Cieslik
(JP)
Dominik Dannehl
(D)
Thomas Deutsch
(T)
Tanja Fehm
(T)
Oliver Graupner
(O)
Max Hackelöer
(M)
Andreas Hartkopf
(A)
Alexander Hein
(A)
Maike Henninsen
(M)
Martin Hirsch
(M)
Sascha Hoffmann
(S)
Hanna Hübner
(H)
Elsa Hollatz-Galuschki
(E)
Bernadette Jäger
(B)
Heike Janse
(H)
Fran Kainer
(F)
Maria M Karsten
(MM)
Marion Kiechle
(M)
Claus Richard Lattrich
(CR)
Andreas Schmutzler
(A)
Elke Schulmeyer
(E)
Eric Steiner
(E)
Lea Louise Volmer
(LL)
Stephanie Wallwiener
(S)
Jan Weichert
(J)
Martin Weiß
(M)
Armin Wöckel
(A)
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Rainer Thiel A, Deimel L, Schmidtmann D, et al (2018) Gesundheitssystem-Vergleich Fokus Digitalisierung #SmartHealthSystems Digitalisierungsstrategien im internationalen Vergleich Teil I: Internationales Benchmarking und Digital-Health-Index Teil II: Erfolgskriterien und Nutzungsgrade digitaler Anwendungen-Vergleichende Länderstudie Teil III: Analyse und Übertragbarkeit
Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C et al (2017) Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775
doi: 10.2196/jmir.8775
pubmed: 29092808
pmcid: 5688245
Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft (2023) Kliniken unterstützen Digitalisierungsstrategie, fordern aber nachhaltige Finanzierung. https://www.dkgev.de/dkg/presse/details/kliniken-unterstuetzen-digitalisierungsstrategie-fordern-aber-nachhaltige-finanzierung/ . Accessed 27 Jun 2023
Utterback JM, Acee HJ (2011) Disruptive technologies: an expanded view. Int J Innov Mgt. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919605001162
doi: 10.1142/S1363919605001162
Marques G, Santos C, Marques CS et al (2021) The impact of knowledge creation and acquisition on innovation, coopetition and international opportunity development. Eur J Int Manag 16:450–472
doi: 10.1504/EJIM.2021.117511
Bittroff M, Sandner P (2020) Blockchain in Healthcare. FSBC Work Pap
OECD (2021) Health at a Glance 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2021_ae3016b9-en . Accessed 27 Jun 2023
IBM (2016) Blockchain: the chain of trust and its potential to transform healthcare-our point of view
Dubovitskaya A, Baig F, Xu Z et al (2020) ACTION-EHR: patient-centric blockchain-based electronic health record data management for cancer care. J Med Internet Res 22(8):e13598. https://doi.org/10.2196/13598
doi: 10.2196/13598
pmcid: 7474412
Gates B (2023) Will ChatGPT transform healthcare? Nat Med 29:505–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02289-5
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02289-5
Siyal AA, Junejo AZ, Zawish M et al (2019) Applications of blockchain technology in medicine and healthcare: challenges and future perspectives. Cryptography 3:3. https://doi.org/10.3390/CRYPTOGRAPHY3010003
doi: 10.3390/CRYPTOGRAPHY3010003
PopulationPyramid.net Population of Germany 2030. https://www.populationpyramid.net/germany/2030/ . Accessed 27 Jun 2023
Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft (2022) Bestandsaufnahme zur Krankenhausplanung und Investitionsfinanzierung in den Bundesländern
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (2023) Digitalisierungsstrategie für das Gesundheitswesen und die Pflege GEMEINSAM DIGITAL
Gaia-X: a federated secure data infrastructure. https://gaia-x.eu/ . Accessed 27 Jun 2023
Pedreira V, Barros D, Pinto P (2021) A review of attacks, vulnerabilities, and defenses in industry 4.0 with new challenges on data sovereignty ahead. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/S21155189
doi: 10.3390/S21155189
pubmed: 34372425
pmcid: 8347485