The economy of pollen dispersal in flowering plants.
pollen export
pollen fates
pollen removal
pollen transfer efficiency
pollinaria
siring success
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 10 2023
11 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
5
10
2023
pubmed:
4
10
2023
entrez:
3
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mating success of flowering plants depends strongly on the efficiencies of pollen removal from flowers and its subsequent dispersal to conspecific stigmas. We characterized the economy of pollen dispersal in flowering plants by analysing pollen fates and their correlates for 228 species. The mean percentage of pollen removed from flowers (removal efficiency) varied almost twofold according to the type of pollen-dispersal unit, from less than 45% for orchids and milkweeds with solid pollinia, to greater than 80% for species with granular monads or sectile (segmented) pollinia. The mean percentage of removed pollen reaching stigmas (pollen transfer efficiency, PTE) varied from 2.4% for species with separate monads to 27.0% for orchids with solid pollinia. These values tended to be higher in plants with single pollinator species and in those with non-grooming pollinators. Nectar production increased removal efficiency, but did not influence PTE. Among types of pollen-dispersal units, the net percentage of produced pollen that was dispersed to stigmas varied negatively with removal efficiency and positively with PTE, indicating the relative importance of the latter for overall pollen economy. These findings confirm the key importance of floral traits, particularly pollen packaging, for pollen dispersal outcomes and highlight the under-appreciated pollination efficiency of non-grooming pollinators.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37788703
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1148
pmc: PMC10547555
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6837249']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20231148Références
Oecologia. 1990 Nov;85(1):41-47
pubmed: 28310953
Am Nat. 2010 Dec;176(6):732-43
pubmed: 20954889
Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):R176-82
pubmed: 21377091
Evolution. 1977 Mar;31(1):32-46
pubmed: 28567723
Funct Ecol. 2017 Jan;31(1):101-115
pubmed: 28344378
Am Nat. 2007 Apr;169(4):494-504
pubmed: 17427121
Ecol Lett. 2019 Mar;22(3):469-479
pubmed: 30609161
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 13;285(1880):
pubmed: 29875304
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 10;11(1):3999
pubmed: 32778648
Integr Comp Biol. 2006 Aug;46(4):390-7
pubmed: 21672751
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jun 28;290(2001):20230967
pubmed: 37357853
Am J Bot. 2022 Aug;109(8):1305-1312
pubmed: 35844034
New Phytol. 2014 Jul;203(1):280-6
pubmed: 24645822
Evolution. 1980 Jul;34(4):738-746
pubmed: 28563987
Evolution. 2003 Apr;57(4):717-45
pubmed: 12778543
Ann Bot. 2019 Jan 23;123(2):225-245
pubmed: 30535041
Biol Lett. 2006 Mar 22;2(1):65-8
pubmed: 17148328
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Oct 11;290(2008):20231148
pubmed: 37788703
Am Nat. 2009 Sep;174(3):382-98
pubmed: 19627226
Ecol Lett. 2020 Jan;23(1):129-139
pubmed: 31650660
Am Nat. 2010 Jan;175(1):98-105
pubmed: 19909087
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jan 23;69(3):525-535
pubmed: 29294036
Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1547-56
pubmed: 19324895
Evolution. 1991 Dec;45(8):1837-1848
pubmed: 28563963
Evolution. 2003 Dec;57(12):2742-52
pubmed: 14761053
Am J Bot. 1999 Jun;86(6):855-70
pubmed: 10371727
Am Nat. 2021 Feb;197(2):250-265
pubmed: 33523780
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 May;84(2):259-76
pubmed: 19382932
J Insect Physiol. 2001 Jul;47(7):725-733
pubmed: 11356419
Am J Bot. 2003 Feb;90(2):214-25
pubmed: 21659111
Oecologia. 2006 Feb;147(1):60-8
pubmed: 16187105
Oecologia. 1983 Nov;60(2):190-197
pubmed: 28310486
Am J Bot. 2023 Jun;110(6):e16177
pubmed: 37146240