The prevalence of thyroid dysfunction and hyperprolactinemia in women with PCOS.
PCOS
TPOab
hyperprolactinemia
reproductive disorders
thyroid dysfunction
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
23
06
2023
accepted:
05
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
19
10
2023
entrez:
19
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ovulatory dysfunction is usually caused by an endocrine disorder, of which polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause. PCOS is usually associated with estrogen levels within the normal range and can be characterized by oligo-/anovulation resulting in decreased progesterone levels. It is suggested that decreased progesterone levels may lead to more autoimmune diseases in women with PCOS. In addition, it is often claimed that there is an association between hyperprolactinemia and PCOS. In this large well-phenotyped cohort of women with PCOS, we have studied the prevalence of thyroid dysfunction and hyperprolactinemia compared to controls, and compared this between the four PCOS phenotypes. This retrospective cross-sectional study contains data of 1429 women with PCOS and 299 women without PCOS. Main outcome measures included thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), Free Thyroxine (FT4), and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOab) levels in serum, the prevalence of thyroid diseases and hyperprolactinemia. The prevalence of thyroid disease in PCOS women was similar to that of controls (1.9% versus 2.7%; P = 0.39 for hypothyroidism and 0.5% versus 0%; P = 0.99 for hyperthyroidism). TSH levels were also similar (1.55 mIU/L versus 1.48 mIU/L; P = 0.54). FT4 levels were slightly elevated in the PCOS group, although within the normal range (18.1 pmol/L versus 17.7 pmol/L; P < 0.05). The prevalence of positive TPOab was similar in both groups (5.7% versus 8.7%; P = 0.12). The prevalence of hyperprolactinemia was similarly not increased in women with PCOS (1.3%% versus 3%; P = 0.05). In a subanalysis of 235 women with PCOS and 235 age- and BMI-matched controls, we found no differences in thyroid dysfunction or hyperprolactinemia. In according to differences between PCOS phenotypes, only the prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism was significantly higher in phenotype B (6.3%, n = 6) compared to the other phenotypes. Women with PCOS do not suffer from thyroid dysfunction more often than controls. Also, the prevalence of positive TPOab, being a marker for future risk of thyroid pathology, was similar in both groups. Furthermore, the prevalence of hyperprolactinemia was similar in women with PCOS compared to controls.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37854182
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1245106
pmc: PMC10579902
doi:
Substances chimiques
Progesterone
4G7DS2Q64Y
Thyrotropin
9002-71-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1245106Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 van der Ham, Stekelenburg, Louwers, van Dorp, Schreurs, van der Wal, Steegers-Theunissen and Laven.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
JL reports grants from Ansh Labs, Webster, Tx, USA, from Ferring, Hoofddorp, NL, from Dutch Heart Association, Utrecht, NL, from Zon MW, Amsterdam, NL, from Roche Diagnostics, Rothkreuz, Switzerland and personal fees from Ferring, Hoofddorp, NL, from Titus Healthcare, Hoofddorp, NL, from Gedeon Richter, Groot-Bijgaarden, Belgium, and is an unpaid board member and president of the AE-PCOS Society, outside the submitted work. The remaining author(s) declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Eur J Clin Invest. 2018 Jul;48(7):e12961
pubmed: 29845629
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:195-203
pubmed: 35220175
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Feb;64(1):47-52
pubmed: 24587607
Ann Med. 1994 Aug;26(4):255-8
pubmed: 7946244
BJOG. 2006 Dec;113(12):1412-8
pubmed: 17081182
Adv Med Sci. 2022 Mar;67(1):79-86
pubmed: 34998115
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2019 Sep 09;13:1179558119871921
pubmed: 31523136
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013 Oct;79(4):545-9
pubmed: 23445257
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017 Feb;67(1):61-65
pubmed: 28242970
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981 Feb;52(2):231-4
pubmed: 7462389
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1986 Feb;24(2):127-33
pubmed: 3708872
Fertil Steril. 2004 Jan;81(1):19-25
pubmed: 14711538
Endocr Connect. 2019 Oct 01;8(10):1405-1415
pubmed: 31518989
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):2178-85
pubmed: 21508129
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003 Feb;58(2):138-40
pubmed: 12580927
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):6-15
pubmed: 27233760
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Oct;150(4):333-344
pubmed: 31823915
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Oct 23;450:227-32
pubmed: 26327459
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jan;96(1):39-46
pubmed: 27861716
Endocr J. 2020 Sep 28;67(9):923-928
pubmed: 32418923
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014 Apr;80(4):616-8
pubmed: 23758202
Eur J Endocrinol. 2004 Mar;150(3):363-9
pubmed: 15012623
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Jan 23;17(1):e66450
pubmed: 30881465
Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):364-379
pubmed: 30033227
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Mar;285(3):853-6
pubmed: 21866332
Endocr Rev. 1984 Summer;5(3):435-55
pubmed: 6381037