Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis.
Applicant selection
Clerkship
Educational assessment
Medical education
Residency and internship
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2023
24 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
01
03
2023
accepted:
12
10
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
25
10
2023
entrez:
24
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pass/fail (P/F) grading has emerged as an alternative to tiered clerkship grading. Systematically evaluating existing literature and surveying program directors (PD) perspectives on these consequential changes can guide educators in addressing inequalities in academia and students aiming to improve their residency applications. In our survey, a total of 1578 unique PD responses (63.1%) were obtained across 29 medical specialties. With the changes to United States Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE), responses showed increased importance of core clerkships with the implementation of Step 2CK cutoffs. PDs believed core clerkship performance was a reliable representation of an applicant's preparedness for residency, particularly in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME)Medical Knowledge and Patient Care and Procedural Skills. PDs disagreed with P/F core clerkships because it more difficult to objectively compare applicants. No statistically significant differences in responses were found in PD preferential selection when comparing applicants from tiered and P/F core clerkship grading systems. If core clerkships adopted P/F scoring, PDs would further increase emphasis on narrative assessment, sub-internship evaluation, reference letters, academic awards, professional development and medical school prestige. In the meta-analysis, of 6 studies from 2,118 participants, adjusted scaled scores with mean difference from an equal variance model from PDs showed residents from tiered clerkship grading systems overall performance, learning ability, work habits, personal evaluations, residency selection and educational evaluation were not statistically significantly different than from residents from P/F systems. Overall, our dual study suggests that while PDs do not favor P/F core clerkships, PDs do not have a selection preference and do not report a difference in performance between applicants from P/F vs. tiered grading core clerkship systems, thus providing fertile grounds for institutions to examine the feasibility of adopting P/F grading for core clerkships.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37875929
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04770-8
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04770-8
pmc: PMC10598945
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
788Subventions
Organisme : UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
ID : Medical Student Research & Scholarship
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Acad Med. 1999 May;74(5):547-9
pubmed: 10353289
Med Educ. 2011 Sep;45(9):867-77
pubmed: 21848714
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1286-1292
pubmed: 29923892
Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1070-6
pubmed: 22722356
J Med Educ. 1979 Nov;54(11):901-2
pubmed: 501722
J Med Educ. 1980 Aug;55(8):656-61
pubmed: 7401142
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2389-2392
pubmed: 32558467
J Med Educ. 1983 Jun;58(6):479-81
pubmed: 6854611
Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 28;11(1):39
pubmed: 31179910
N Engl J Med. 1978 Jul 6;299(1):25-7
pubmed: 661847
Am J Surg. 1991 Jul;162(1):63-6
pubmed: 2063972
Acad Med. 2019 Apr;94(4):469-472
pubmed: 30113359