Pelvic exenteration for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis after multimodal treatment of pelvic malignancy.


Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 27 08 2023
revised: 02 10 2023
accepted: 20 10 2023
medline: 4 12 2023
pubmed: 26 10 2023
entrez: 25 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis is an uncommon complication of multimodal treatment of visceral pelvic tumours. Radical multi-visceral resection is reserved for patients with persistent, debilitating symptoms despite less invasive treatments and for which there is minimal published data. This study aimed to report the rates of morbidity and long-term sepsis control after pelvic exenteration for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume pelvic exenteration referral centre. Patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis between September 1994 and January 2023 after previous treatment for pelvic malignancy were included. Data relating to postoperative morbidity, mortality and the rate of recurrent pelvic sepsis or fistulae were retrospectively collected. 19 patients who underwent radical resection for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis after previous pelvic cancer treatment were included. 11 patients were male (58 %) and median age was 62 years (range 42-79). Previously treated rectal (8 patients, 42 %), prostate (5, 26 %) and cervical cancer (5, 26 %) were most common. 18 patients (95 %) had previously received high-dose pelvic radiotherapy, and 14 (74 %) had required surgical resection. Total pelvic exenteration was performed in 47 % of patients, total cystectomy in 68 % and major pubic bone resection in 37 %. There was no intraoperative or postoperative mortality. Major complication rate was 32 %. 12-month readmission rate was 42 %. At last follow up, 74 % had no signs or symptoms of persisting pelvic sepsis. Pelvic exenteration for refractory pelvic sepsis following treatment of malignancy is safe and effective in selected patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis is an uncommon complication of multimodal treatment of visceral pelvic tumours. Radical multi-visceral resection is reserved for patients with persistent, debilitating symptoms despite less invasive treatments and for which there is minimal published data. This study aimed to report the rates of morbidity and long-term sepsis control after pelvic exenteration for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume pelvic exenteration referral centre. Patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis between September 1994 and January 2023 after previous treatment for pelvic malignancy were included. Data relating to postoperative morbidity, mortality and the rate of recurrent pelvic sepsis or fistulae were retrospectively collected.
RESULTS RESULTS
19 patients who underwent radical resection for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis after previous pelvic cancer treatment were included. 11 patients were male (58 %) and median age was 62 years (range 42-79). Previously treated rectal (8 patients, 42 %), prostate (5, 26 %) and cervical cancer (5, 26 %) were most common. 18 patients (95 %) had previously received high-dose pelvic radiotherapy, and 14 (74 %) had required surgical resection. Total pelvic exenteration was performed in 47 % of patients, total cystectomy in 68 % and major pubic bone resection in 37 %. There was no intraoperative or postoperative mortality. Major complication rate was 32 %. 12-month readmission rate was 42 %. At last follow up, 74 % had no signs or symptoms of persisting pelvic sepsis.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Pelvic exenteration for refractory pelvic sepsis following treatment of malignancy is safe and effective in selected patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37879161
pii: S0748-7983(23)00762-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107124
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107124

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Kilian G M Brown (KGM)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Charles Risbey (C)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Michael J Solomon (MJ)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: professor.solomon@sydney.edu.au.

Kirk K S Austin (KKS)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Peter J Lee (PJ)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Christopher M Byrne (CM)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH