Bacterial community composition in a two-stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor for co-digestion of food waste and food court wastewater.
Co-digestion
Metabolic function
Methanogenesis
Microbial community
Two-stage anaerobic digestion
Journal
Bioresource technology
ISSN: 1873-2976
Titre abrégé: Bioresour Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9889523
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
04
08
2023
revised:
24
10
2023
accepted:
24
10
2023
medline:
23
11
2023
pubmed:
29
10
2023
entrez:
28
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigated the microbial community of a two-stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor (2S-AnMBR) co-digesting food waste and food court wastewater. The hydrolysis reactor (HR) was dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phylum, with genus Lactobacillus enriched due to food waste fermentation. The up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) was dominated by genus such as Methanobacterium and Methanosaeta. The presence of Methanobacterium (91 %) and Methanosaeta (7.5 %) suggested that methane production pathways inevitably undergo both hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogenesis. Hydrogen generated during hydrolysis fermentation in the HR contributed to methane production in the UASB via hydrogenotrophic pathways. However, the low abundance of Methanosaeta in the UASB can be attributed to the limited inffluent of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and the competitive presence of acetate-consuming bacteria Acinetobacter. The UASB exhibited more excellent dispersion and diversity of metabolic pathways compared to the HR, indicating efficient methane production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37898371
pii: S0960-8524(23)01353-6
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129925
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Wastewater
0
Sewage
0
Methane
OP0UW79H66
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
129925Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.