Can video communication in the emergency medical communication centre improve dispatch precision? A before-after study in Norwegian helicopter emergency medical services.
accident & emergency medicine
adult intensive & critical care
health services accessibility
telemedicine
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 10 2023
29 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
31
10
2023
pubmed:
30
10
2023
entrez:
29
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dispatching helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) to the patients with the greatest medical or logistical benefit remains challenging. The introduction of video calls (VC) in the emergency medical communication centres (EMCC) could provide additional information for EMCC operators and HEMS physicians when assessing the need for HEMS dispatch. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact from VC in the EMCC on HEMS dispatch precision. An observational before-after study. The regional EMCC and one HEMS base in Mid-Norway. EMCC operators and HEMS physicians at the EMCC and HEMS base in Trondheim, Norway. In January 2022, VC became available in emergency calls in Trondheim EMCC. Data were collected from 2020 2021 (pre-intervention) and 2022 (post-intervention). The primary outcome was the proportion of seriously ill or injured HEMS patients, defined as a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score between 4 and 7. The secondary outcome was the proportion of inappropriate dispatches, defined as missions with neither provision of additional competence nor any logistical contribution based on quality indicators for physician-staffed emergency medical services. 811 and 402 HEMS missions with patient contact were included in the pre- and post-intervention group, respectively. The proportion of missions with NACA 4-7 was not significantly changed after the intervention (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.61, p=0.17). There was no significant change in HEMS alarm times between the pre- and post-intervention groups (7.6 min vs 6.4 min, p=0.15). The proportion of missions with neither medical nor logistical benefit was significantly lower in the post-intervention group (28.4% vs 40.3%, p=0.007). The results from this study indicate that VC is a promising, feasible and safe tool for EMCC operators in the complex HEMS dispatch process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37899141
pii: bmjopen-2023-077395
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077395
pmc: PMC10618992
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e077395Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: OEU, HH and KT hold research positions in The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, a non-profit charity organisation. NAAF is the owner of the Norwegian Air Ambulance, which is the current contractor of the helicopter emergency medical services in Norway.
Références
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Feb 15;25(1):14
pubmed: 28202076
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Aug;24(7):473-481
pubmed: 29278996
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Apr 13;25(1):40
pubmed: 28407809
Air Med J. 2021 Jan-Feb;40(1):20-27
pubmed: 33455621
J Inj Violence Res. 2022 Dec 12;15(1):
pubmed: 36504196
Anaesthesist. 2001 Mar;50(3):150-4
pubmed: 11315486
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 13;19:57
pubmed: 21996444
BMC Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 27;15:32
pubmed: 26507648
Resuscitation. 2021 Nov;168:35-43
pubmed: 34509558
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):180
pubmed: 29282048
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 25;27(1):8
pubmed: 30683139
Stat Med. 1998 Jul 30;17(14):1623-34
pubmed: 9699234
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Dec;37(6):819-826
pubmed: 36138554
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 May;60(5):659-67
pubmed: 26810562
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):521-5
pubmed: 23834231
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Nov;57(10):1253-9
pubmed: 24134443
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 May;61(5):557-565
pubmed: 28317095
Eur Heart J. 2016 May 07;37(18):1428-38
pubmed: 26873093
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202215
pubmed: 30092090
Emerg Med J. 2018 Dec;35(12):720-725
pubmed: 30352808
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 9;29(1):31
pubmed: 33563301
Anaesthesist. 2008 Nov;57(11):1069-74
pubmed: 18839122
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Jan;62(1):116-124
pubmed: 29105064
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):40
pubmed: 27737641
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 3;9(11):e030626
pubmed: 31685504
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):464-471
pubmed: 35107406
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):e7
pubmed: 27076505
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 May 8;27(1):55
pubmed: 31068199
Emerg Med J. 2010 Sep;27(9):692-701
pubmed: 20679422
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):101
pubmed: 34488626
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:257-258
pubmed: 32601007
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 16;12(12):e063395
pubmed: 36526307