Identification of MARK2, CCDC71, GATA2, and KLRC3 as candidate diagnostic genes and potential therapeutic targets for repeated implantation failure with antiphospholipid syndrome by integrated bioinformatics analysis and machine learning.
anti-phospholipid syndrome
bioinformatics analyses
immune infiltration
machine learning
nomogram
repeated implantation failure
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
17
12
2022
accepted:
28
09
2023
medline:
31
10
2023
pubmed:
30
10
2023
entrez:
30
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a group of clinical syndromes of thrombosis or adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by antiphospholipid antibodies, which increase the incidence of To obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs), we downloaded the APS and RIF datasets separately from the public Gene Expression Omnibus database and performed differential expression analysis. We then identified the common DEGs of APS and RIF. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were performed, and we then generated protein-protein interaction. Furthermore, immune infiltration was investigated by using the CIBERSORT algorithm on the APS and RIF datasets. LASSO regression analysis was used to screen for candidate diagnostic genes. To evaluate the diagnostic value, we developed a nomogram and validated it with receiver operating characteristic curves, then analyzed these genes in the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database. Finally, the Drug Gene Interaction Database was searched for potential therapeutic drugs, and the interactions between drugs, genes, and immune cells were depicted with a Sankey diagram. There were 11 common DEGs identified: four downregulated and seven upregulated. The common DEG analysis suggested that an imbalance of immune system-related cells and molecules may be a common feature in the pathophysiology of APS and RIF. Following validation, MARK2, CCDC71, GATA2, and KLRC3 were identified as candidate diagnostic genes. Finally, Acetaminophen and Fasudil were predicted as two candidate drugs. Four immune-associated candidate diagnostic genes (MARK2, CCDC71, GATA2, and KLRC3) were identified, and a nomogram for RIF with APS diagnosis was developed. Our findings may aid in the investigation of potential biological mechanisms linking APS and RIF, as well as potential targets for diagnosis and treatment.
Sections du résumé
Background
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a group of clinical syndromes of thrombosis or adverse pregnancy outcomes caused by antiphospholipid antibodies, which increase the incidence of
Methods
To obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs), we downloaded the APS and RIF datasets separately from the public Gene Expression Omnibus database and performed differential expression analysis. We then identified the common DEGs of APS and RIF. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were performed, and we then generated protein-protein interaction. Furthermore, immune infiltration was investigated by using the CIBERSORT algorithm on the APS and RIF datasets. LASSO regression analysis was used to screen for candidate diagnostic genes. To evaluate the diagnostic value, we developed a nomogram and validated it with receiver operating characteristic curves, then analyzed these genes in the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database. Finally, the Drug Gene Interaction Database was searched for potential therapeutic drugs, and the interactions between drugs, genes, and immune cells were depicted with a Sankey diagram.
Results
There were 11 common DEGs identified: four downregulated and seven upregulated. The common DEG analysis suggested that an imbalance of immune system-related cells and molecules may be a common feature in the pathophysiology of APS and RIF. Following validation, MARK2, CCDC71, GATA2, and KLRC3 were identified as candidate diagnostic genes. Finally, Acetaminophen and Fasudil were predicted as two candidate drugs.
Conclusion
Four immune-associated candidate diagnostic genes (MARK2, CCDC71, GATA2, and KLRC3) were identified, and a nomogram for RIF with APS diagnosis was developed. Our findings may aid in the investigation of potential biological mechanisms linking APS and RIF, as well as potential targets for diagnosis and treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37901230
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1126103
pmc: PMC10603295
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Antiphospholipid
0
Acetaminophen
362O9ITL9D
MARK2 protein, human
EC 2.7.1.-
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases
EC 2.7.11.1
GATA2 protein, human
0
GATA2 Transcription Factor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1126103Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Ge, Zhang and La.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Jan;35(1):e23559
pubmed: 32892443
J Reprod Immunol. 2017 Feb;119:9-14
pubmed: 27865124
J Cell Mol Med. 2017 Feb;21(2):244-253
pubmed: 27641066
Circulation. 2016 Dec 13;134(24):1973-1990
pubmed: 27780851
J Pathol. 2011 Dec;225(4):554-64
pubmed: 22025212
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
Gene Expr Patterns. 2012 May-Jun;12(5-6):196-203
pubmed: 22476030
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Nov 20;17(Suppl 1):131
pubmed: 30458798
BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Feb 27;14(1):59
pubmed: 33639933
Cell Logist. 2017 Jan 9;7(1):e1271498
pubmed: 28396819
Autoimmun Rev. 2022 Jun;21(6):103101
pubmed: 35452853
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2017 Aug;53(1):54-67
pubmed: 27395067
Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220):1260419
pubmed: 25613900
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 12;13(6):e0198821
pubmed: 29894515
Am J Pathol. 2015 Oct;185(10):2805-18
pubmed: 26254283
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1388-D1395
pubmed: 33151290
Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):809-817
pubmed: 32741616
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 27;104(13):5680-5
pubmed: 17372192
Hypertension. 2018 Jul;72(1):177-187
pubmed: 29785960
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1144-D1151
pubmed: 33237278
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun;50(6):101912
pubmed: 32950746
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1138-D1143
pubmed: 33068428
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jun;33(12):1988-1993
pubmed: 30309273
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2022 Oct;88(4):e13607
pubmed: 35929523
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;21(3):291-5
pubmed: 19469047
OMICS. 2012 May;16(5):284-7
pubmed: 22455463
Mol Cell Biol. 2001 May;21(9):3206-19
pubmed: 11287624
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 28;13:984480
pubmed: 36389763
Front Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;9:1314
pubmed: 31921619
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jul;74(7):1441-9
pubmed: 24618261
Mol Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 29;28(8):
pubmed: 35758607
Ann Oncol. 2022 Sep;33(9):909-915
pubmed: 35654248
Nat Methods. 2015 May;12(5):453-7
pubmed: 25822800
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 25;13:936707
pubmed: 35958546
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W60-W64
pubmed: 29912392
J Immunol. 2017 Apr 1;198(7):2640-2648
pubmed: 28193831
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019 Jun;25(6):783-795
pubmed: 30779332
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Jun;1108:457-65
pubmed: 17894010
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 7;73(8):1118-1127
pubmed: 33779714
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D991-5
pubmed: 23193258
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jul;35(1):28-36
pubmed: 28476486
Med Clin (Barc). 2021 May 21;156(10):515-519
pubmed: 33632509
J Reprod Immunol. 2020 Apr;138:103080
pubmed: 32120158
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Mar 16;9:613277
pubmed: 33796523
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007 Jan;57(1):34-9
pubmed: 17156189
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012 Jul 15;17(2):224-36
pubmed: 22221012
Exp Hematol. 2015 Jul;43(7):565-77.e1-10
pubmed: 25907033
Methods Protoc. 2020 Sep 23;3(4):
pubmed: 32977580
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Jan;28(1):14-38
pubmed: 24269084
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 02;2020:8780253
pubmed: 32190685
Dev Biol. 1999 Oct 1;214(1):87-101
pubmed: 10491259
JCI Insight. 2017 Sep 21;2(18):
pubmed: 28931754
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D607-D613
pubmed: 30476243
Oman Med J. 2017 Jul;32(4):316-321
pubmed: 28804584
Endocrinology. 2020 Jun 1;161(6):
pubmed: 32335672
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2018 Feb 1;28(3):466-469
pubmed: 29269216
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559
pubmed: 19114008
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014 Dec;72(6):549-54
pubmed: 24964397
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D330-D338
pubmed: 30395331
Neural Regen Res. 2022 Dec;17(12):2623-2631
pubmed: 35662192
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30
pubmed: 10592173
Am J Transl Res. 2021 May 15;13(5):4068-4079
pubmed: 34149999
Blood. 2017 Apr 13;129(15):2092-2102
pubmed: 28179282
Mol Endocrinol. 2006 Jun;20(6):1366-77
pubmed: 16543408
Science. 2000 Oct 6;290(5489):134-8
pubmed: 11021798
Sci Immunol. 2019 Jan 11;4(31):
pubmed: 30635356
PLoS Genet. 2014 Mar 06;10(3):e1004158
pubmed: 24603652
Reprod Sci. 2019 Jul;26(7):879-890
pubmed: 30081718
Hypertension. 2022 Sep;79(9):1922-1926
pubmed: 35862146
Physiol Rep. 2019 Apr;7(7):e14038
pubmed: 30963715