Evaluation of lay health workers on quality of care in the inpatient setting.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
03
2023
accepted:
04
10
2023
medline:
3
11
2023
pubmed:
1
11
2023
entrez:
1
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the impact of a lay health worker support role in the inpatient setting. Healthcare systems are facing critical nursing and nurse assistant staffing shortages. These disciplines can be challenging to recruit and retain, leading healthcare leaders to identify innovative staffing models. Whereas lay health workers have been used in the community and low-income setting, there is scant evidence of their use in the inpatient setting. We implemented a lay health worker role, called Patient Attendant Service Aides (PASAs), on two medical/surgical units at a community hospital. A pre/post-implementation design was used for this study. An online survey was provided to nurses, nursing assistants, and PASAs on the two medical/surgical units to assess their satisfaction and perceptions of the role. Nursing quality metrics, patient satisfaction, and nursing and nursing assistant turnover were evaluated before and after implementing the role. The online survey showed that nurses and nursing assistants felt that PASAs helped offload their workload, allowing them to focus on nursing-related tasks. PASAs felt supported by the team and believed they were making a meaningful contribution to the unit. There were slight improvements in patient satisfaction, although not significant. There was a significant improvement in nursing turnover on Unit A, from 71.1% to 21.6% (p = 0.009). This is one of the first studies to evaluate the use of lay health workers in the inpatient setting; we found this role to be a feasible way to offload tasks from clinical staff. This role may serve as a pathway for workforce development, as several PASAs are now enrolled in nursing assistant training. Nurse managers may consider using lay health workers in the inpatient setting as they face severe clinical staff shortages.
Sections du résumé
AIMS
To evaluate the impact of a lay health worker support role in the inpatient setting.
BACKGROUND
Healthcare systems are facing critical nursing and nurse assistant staffing shortages. These disciplines can be challenging to recruit and retain, leading healthcare leaders to identify innovative staffing models. Whereas lay health workers have been used in the community and low-income setting, there is scant evidence of their use in the inpatient setting. We implemented a lay health worker role, called Patient Attendant Service Aides (PASAs), on two medical/surgical units at a community hospital.
METHODS
A pre/post-implementation design was used for this study. An online survey was provided to nurses, nursing assistants, and PASAs on the two medical/surgical units to assess their satisfaction and perceptions of the role. Nursing quality metrics, patient satisfaction, and nursing and nursing assistant turnover were evaluated before and after implementing the role.
RESULTS
The online survey showed that nurses and nursing assistants felt that PASAs helped offload their workload, allowing them to focus on nursing-related tasks. PASAs felt supported by the team and believed they were making a meaningful contribution to the unit. There were slight improvements in patient satisfaction, although not significant. There was a significant improvement in nursing turnover on Unit A, from 71.1% to 21.6% (p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS
This is one of the first studies to evaluate the use of lay health workers in the inpatient setting; we found this role to be a feasible way to offload tasks from clinical staff. This role may serve as a pathway for workforce development, as several PASAs are now enrolled in nursing assistant training. Nurse managers may consider using lay health workers in the inpatient setting as they face severe clinical staff shortages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37910461
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293068
pii: PONE-D-23-09485
pmc: PMC10619767
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0293068Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Basnight et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Nurs Adm. 2019 Apr;49(4):221-227
pubmed: 30882611
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 23;2022:9443229
pubmed: 35372572
J Nurs Adm. 2022 Jan 1;52(1):1-3
pubmed: 34910702
Int J Nurs Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):e12803
pubmed: 31850645
Clin Nurse Spec. 2016 Sep-Oct;30(5):250-2
pubmed: 27509558
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Oct;27(7):1438-1444
pubmed: 31306521
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Aug;18(4):251-260
pubmed: 34355844
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1744-1751
pubmed: 30395515
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 02;18(15):
pubmed: 34360462
J Nurs Manag. 2018 Oct;26(7):858-865
pubmed: 30171648
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jul;74(7):1474-1487
pubmed: 29517813
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Sep;72(9):2086-97
pubmed: 27095463
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1359-1366
pubmed: 30054634
Lancet. 2021 May 22;397(10288):1905-1913
pubmed: 33989553
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2127-2128
pubmed: 32364565
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr 01;41(2):110-114
pubmed: 35099158
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Oct;35(3):293-306
pubmed: 34511220
J Nurs Adm. 2019 May;49(5):260-265
pubmed: 31008835