Treatment of diabetic kidney disease. A network meta-analysis.
Adult
Humans
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Diabetic Nephropathies
/ drug therapy
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Network Meta-Analysis
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Kidney Failure, Chronic
/ drug therapy
Angiotensins
Diabetes Mellitus
/ drug therapy
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
01
2023
accepted:
07
10
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
2
11
2023
entrez:
2
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a health burden of rising importance. Slowing progression to end stage kidney disease is the main goal of drug treatment. The aim of this analysis is to compare drug treatments of DKD by means of a systemic review and a network meta-analysis. We searched Medline, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized, controlled studies including adults with DKD treated with the following drugs of interest: single angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor-blocker (single ACEi/ARB), angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor and angiotensin-receptor-blocker combination (ACEi+ARB combination), aldosterone antagonists, direct renin inhibitors, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid-receptor-antagonists (nsMRA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). As primary endpoints, we defined: overall mortality and end-stage kidney disease, as secondary endpoints: renal composite outcome and albuminuria and as safety endpoints: acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia and hypotension. Under the use of a random effects model, we computed the overall effect estimates using the statistic program R4.1 and the corresponding package "netmeta". Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool and the quality of evidence of each pairwise comparison was rated according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Of initial 3489 publications, 38 clinical trials were found eligible, in total including 42346 patients. Concerning the primary endpoints overall mortality and end stage kidney disease, SGLT2i on top of single ACEi/ARB compared to single ACEi/ARB was the only intervention significantly reducing the odds of mortality (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.70-0.95) and end-stage kidney disease (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.54-0.88). The indirect comparison of nsMRA vs SGLT2i in our composite endpoint suggests a superiority of SGLT2i (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.47-0.76). Concerning safety endpoints, nsMRA and SGLT2i showed benefits compared to the others. As the only drug class, SGLT2i showed in our analysis beneficial effects on top of ACEi/ARB treatment regarding mortality and end stage kidney disease and by that reconfirmed its position as treatment option for diabetic kidney disease. nsMRA reduced the odds for a combined renal endpoint and did not raise any safety concerns, justifying its application.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a health burden of rising importance. Slowing progression to end stage kidney disease is the main goal of drug treatment. The aim of this analysis is to compare drug treatments of DKD by means of a systemic review and a network meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched Medline, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized, controlled studies including adults with DKD treated with the following drugs of interest: single angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor-blocker (single ACEi/ARB), angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitor and angiotensin-receptor-blocker combination (ACEi+ARB combination), aldosterone antagonists, direct renin inhibitors, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid-receptor-antagonists (nsMRA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). As primary endpoints, we defined: overall mortality and end-stage kidney disease, as secondary endpoints: renal composite outcome and albuminuria and as safety endpoints: acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia and hypotension. Under the use of a random effects model, we computed the overall effect estimates using the statistic program R4.1 and the corresponding package "netmeta". Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool and the quality of evidence of each pairwise comparison was rated according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).
RESULTS
Of initial 3489 publications, 38 clinical trials were found eligible, in total including 42346 patients. Concerning the primary endpoints overall mortality and end stage kidney disease, SGLT2i on top of single ACEi/ARB compared to single ACEi/ARB was the only intervention significantly reducing the odds of mortality (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.70-0.95) and end-stage kidney disease (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.54-0.88). The indirect comparison of nsMRA vs SGLT2i in our composite endpoint suggests a superiority of SGLT2i (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.47-0.76). Concerning safety endpoints, nsMRA and SGLT2i showed benefits compared to the others.
CONCLUSIONS
As the only drug class, SGLT2i showed in our analysis beneficial effects on top of ACEi/ARB treatment regarding mortality and end stage kidney disease and by that reconfirmed its position as treatment option for diabetic kidney disease. nsMRA reduced the odds for a combined renal endpoint and did not raise any safety concerns, justifying its application.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37917640
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293183
pii: PONE-D-23-02576
pmc: PMC10621862
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
Angiotensins
0
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0293183Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Büttner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2019 Nov;28(6):519-526
pubmed: 31449083
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Jun 26;19(1):98
pubmed: 32590982
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Feb;14(2):415-424
pubmed: 36566447
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):323-34
pubmed: 27299675
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Aug;24(8):1448-1457
pubmed: 35665989
Kidney Int. 2022 Nov;102(5):990-999
pubmed: 36272755
Hypertension. 2018 Apr;71(4):599-608
pubmed: 29437893
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017 Jan;13(1):11-26
pubmed: 27941935
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016 Jun 1;310(11):F1269-83
pubmed: 26764207
Kidney Int. 2004 Jun;65(6):2309-20
pubmed: 15149345
Kidney Int. 2022 Nov;102(5):974-989
pubmed: 36202661
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021 May;17(5):319-334
pubmed: 33547417
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 03;383(23):2219-2229
pubmed: 33264825
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):2252-2263
pubmed: 34449181
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):98-110
pubmed: 26062084
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Oct 14;7(1):36-45
pubmed: 35005312
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 14;369(20):1892-903
pubmed: 24206457
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2204-13
pubmed: 23121378
Diabetologia. 2017 Feb;60(2):364-376
pubmed: 27866224
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014 Jan;306(2):F194-204
pubmed: 24226524
Lancet. 2007 Apr 7;369(9568):1208-19
pubmed: 17416265
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 09;13:35
pubmed: 23496991
Lancet. 2015 May 23;385(9982):2047-56
pubmed: 26009228
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Mar;12(3):346-356
pubmed: 32654341
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2295-2306
pubmed: 30990260
Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84
pubmed: 22890468
BMJ. 2014 Sep 24;349:g5630
pubmed: 25252733
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Mar 31;38(4):894-903
pubmed: 35700142
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012 Jan 1;302(1):R75-83
pubmed: 21940401
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;64(1):69-78
pubmed: 24621652
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;93:36-44
pubmed: 29051107
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222
pubmed: 33069326
J Hypertens. 2006 Nov;24(11):2285-92
pubmed: 17053552
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Jul;61(7):1013-1025
pubmed: 35508594
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 03;9(7):e99682
pubmed: 24992266
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 9;16(12):e1002983
pubmed: 31815931
JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Nov;9(11):807-820
pubmed: 34446370