Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for second-generation ethanol production from xylo-oligosaccharides and acetate.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 11 2023
06 11 2023
Historique:
received:
22
08
2023
accepted:
30
10
2023
medline:
8
11
2023
pubmed:
7
11
2023
entrez:
6
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Simultaneous intracellular depolymerization of xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) and acetate fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae offers significant potential for more cost-effective second-generation (2G) ethanol production. In the present work, the previously engineered S. cerevisiae strain, SR8A6S3, expressing enzymes for xylose assimilation along with an optimized route for acetate reduction, was used as the host for expressing two β-xylosidases, GH43-2 and GH43-7, and a xylodextrin transporter, CDT-2, from Neurospora crassa, yielding the engineered SR8A6S3-CDT-2-GH34-2/7 strain. Both β-xylosidases and the transporter were introduced by replacing two endogenous genes, GRE3 and SOR1, that encode aldose reductase and sorbitol (xylitol) dehydrogenase, respectively, and catalyse steps in xylitol production. The engineered strain, SR8A6S3-CDT-2-GH34-2/7 (sor1Δ gre3Δ), produced ethanol through simultaneous XOS, xylose, and acetate co-utilization. The mutant strain produced 60% more ethanol and 12% less xylitol than the control strain when a hemicellulosic hydrolysate was used as a mono- and oligosaccharide source. Similarly, the ethanol yield was 84% higher for the engineered strain using hydrolysed xylan, compared with the parental strain. Xylan, a common polysaccharide in lignocellulosic residues, enables recombinant strains to outcompete contaminants in fermentation tanks, as XOS transport and breakdown occur intracellularly. Furthermore, acetic acid is a ubiquitous toxic component in lignocellulosic hydrolysates, deriving from hemicellulose and lignin breakdown. Therefore, the consumption of XOS, xylose, and acetate expands the capabilities of S. cerevisiae for utilization of all of the carbohydrate in lignocellulose, potentially increasing the efficiency of 2G biofuel production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37932303
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46293-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-46293-8
pmc: PMC10628280
doi:
Substances chimiques
Xylans
0
Xylose
A1TA934AKO
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
Xylitol
VCQ006KQ1E
Oligosaccharides
0
D-Xylulose Reductase
EC 1.1.1.9
Xylosidases
EC 3.2.1.-
Acetates
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19182Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Elife. 2015 Feb 03;4:
pubmed: 25647728
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019 Jun;57:56-65
pubmed: 30785001
Metab Eng. 2018 Jan;45:121-133
pubmed: 29196124
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
pubmed: 942051
Bioresour Technol. 2022 Jan;344(Pt B):126292
pubmed: 34748984
PLoS Genet. 2010 May 13;6(5):e1000942
pubmed: 20485559
Bioresour Technol. 2002 May;83(1):1-11
pubmed: 12058826
Metab Eng Commun. 2015 Mar 20;2:13-22
pubmed: 34150504
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022 Jun;106(11):4041-4052
pubmed: 35665835
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4775-800
pubmed: 20171088
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jun;70(6):3681-6
pubmed: 15184173
Biotechnol J. 2016 Jul;11(7):988-92
pubmed: 26848939
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Oct;313:123630
pubmed: 32561105
FEBS Lett. 1999 Aug 20;457(1):135-8
pubmed: 10486580
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Feb;98(3):1087-94
pubmed: 24190499
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Apr 04;82(8):2280-2287
pubmed: 26850302
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Sep;91(5):1267-75
pubmed: 21735264
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Nov;66(1):10-26
pubmed: 15300416
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022 Jan;106(1):383-399
pubmed: 34913993
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016 Dec;113(12):2587-2596
pubmed: 27240865
Biotechnol Lett. 2020 Apr;42(4):571-582
pubmed: 31974646
Yeast. 1995 Apr 15;11(4):355-60
pubmed: 7785336
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):5407-14
pubmed: 15345427
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Feb 15;6(1):22
pubmed: 23409974
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 27;15(7):e0236294
pubmed: 32716960
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Oct;313:123637
pubmed: 32535521
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2020 Feb;133:109442
pubmed: 31874688
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2011;75(6):1140-6
pubmed: 21670522
FEMS Yeast Res. 2009 May;9(3):358-64
pubmed: 19416101
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Sep;38(9):1427-35
pubmed: 21188613
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2580
pubmed: 24105024
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018 Apr;50:72-80
pubmed: 29195120
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Dec;67(12):5668-74
pubmed: 11722921
J Biotechnol. 2012 Apr 30;158(4):203-10
pubmed: 21741417
Molecules. 2021 Feb 04;26(4):
pubmed: 33557207
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jan 04;82(6):1686-1692
pubmed: 26729713
Yeast. 2019 Sep;36(9):541-556
pubmed: 31254359
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Oct 1;36(11):166
pubmed: 33000321
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1993 Apr;10(3-4):229-42
pubmed: 8318258
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 08;10(9):e0137466
pubmed: 26348330
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57048
pubmed: 23468911
Science. 2007 Feb 9;315(5813):804-7
pubmed: 17289988
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 15;10:825981
pubmed: 35242749
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021 Nov 25;14(1):221
pubmed: 34823583
FEMS Yeast Res. 2020 Dec 16;20(8):
pubmed: 33201998
Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2011;2:121-45
pubmed: 22432613