The NORDeHEALTH 2022 Patient Survey: Cross-Sectional Study of National Patient Portal Users in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Estonia.
electronic health record
health data
national survey
online medical record
online records access
patient access
patient portal
patient-accessible electronic health record
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 11 2023
13 11 2023
Historique:
received:
28
03
2023
accepted:
29
09
2023
revised:
10
05
2023
medline:
14
11
2023
pubmed:
13
11
2023
entrez:
13
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although many surveys have been conducted on patients accessing their own health records in recent years, there is a limited amount of nationwide cross-country data available on patients' views and preferences. To address this gap, an international survey of patient users was conducted in the Nordic eHealth project, NORDeHEALTH. We aimed to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics and experiences of patients who accessed their electronic health records (EHRs) through national patient portals in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Estonia. A cross-sectional web-based survey was distributed using the national online health portals. The target participants were patients who accessed the national patient portals at the start of 2022 and who were aged ≥15 years. The survey included a mixture of close-ended and free-text questions about participant sociodemographics, usability experience, experiences with health care and the EHR, reasons for reading health records online, experience with errors, omissions and offense, opinions about security and privacy, and the usefulness of portal functions. In this paper, we summarized the data on participant demographics, past experience with health care, and the patient portal through descriptive statistics. In total, 29,334 users completed the survey, of which 9503 (32.40%) were from Norway, 13,008 (44.35%) from Sweden, 4713 (16.07%) from Finland, and 2104 (7.17%) from Estonia. National samples were comparable according to reported gender, with about two-thirds identifying as women (19,904/29,302, 67.93%). Age distributions were similar across the countries, but Finland had older users while Estonia had younger users. The highest attained education and presence of health care education varied among the national samples. In all 4 countries, patients most commonly rated their health as "fair" (11,279/29,302, 38.48%). In Estonia, participants were more often inclined to rate their health positively, whereas Norway and Sweden had the highest proportion of negative health ratings. Across the whole sample, most patients received some care in the last 2 years (25,318/29,254, 86.55%). Mental health care was more common (6214/29,254, 21.24%) than oncological care (3664/29,254, 12.52%). Overall, most patients had accessed their health record "2 to 9 times" (11,546/29,306, 39.4%), with the most frequent users residing in Sweden, where about one-third of patients accessed it "more than 20 times" (4571/13,008, 35.14%). This is the first large-scale international survey to compare patient users' sociodemographics and experiences with accessing their EHRs. Although the countries are in close geographic proximity and demonstrate similar advancements in giving their residents online records access, patient users in this survey differed. We will continue to investigate patients' experiences and opinions about national patient-accessible EHRs through focused analyses of the national and combined data sets from the NORDeHEALTH 2022 Patient Survey.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Although many surveys have been conducted on patients accessing their own health records in recent years, there is a limited amount of nationwide cross-country data available on patients' views and preferences. To address this gap, an international survey of patient users was conducted in the Nordic eHealth project, NORDeHEALTH.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics and experiences of patients who accessed their electronic health records (EHRs) through national patient portals in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Estonia.
METHODS
A cross-sectional web-based survey was distributed using the national online health portals. The target participants were patients who accessed the national patient portals at the start of 2022 and who were aged ≥15 years. The survey included a mixture of close-ended and free-text questions about participant sociodemographics, usability experience, experiences with health care and the EHR, reasons for reading health records online, experience with errors, omissions and offense, opinions about security and privacy, and the usefulness of portal functions. In this paper, we summarized the data on participant demographics, past experience with health care, and the patient portal through descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
In total, 29,334 users completed the survey, of which 9503 (32.40%) were from Norway, 13,008 (44.35%) from Sweden, 4713 (16.07%) from Finland, and 2104 (7.17%) from Estonia. National samples were comparable according to reported gender, with about two-thirds identifying as women (19,904/29,302, 67.93%). Age distributions were similar across the countries, but Finland had older users while Estonia had younger users. The highest attained education and presence of health care education varied among the national samples. In all 4 countries, patients most commonly rated their health as "fair" (11,279/29,302, 38.48%). In Estonia, participants were more often inclined to rate their health positively, whereas Norway and Sweden had the highest proportion of negative health ratings. Across the whole sample, most patients received some care in the last 2 years (25,318/29,254, 86.55%). Mental health care was more common (6214/29,254, 21.24%) than oncological care (3664/29,254, 12.52%). Overall, most patients had accessed their health record "2 to 9 times" (11,546/29,306, 39.4%), with the most frequent users residing in Sweden, where about one-third of patients accessed it "more than 20 times" (4571/13,008, 35.14%).
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first large-scale international survey to compare patient users' sociodemographics and experiences with accessing their EHRs. Although the countries are in close geographic proximity and demonstrate similar advancements in giving their residents online records access, patient users in this survey differed. We will continue to investigate patients' experiences and opinions about national patient-accessible EHRs through focused analyses of the national and combined data sets from the NORDeHEALTH 2022 Patient Survey.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37955963
pii: v25i1e47573
doi: 10.2196/47573
pmc: PMC10682922
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e47573Informations de copyright
©Maria Hägglund, Anna Kharko, Josefin Hagström, Annika Bärkås, Charlotte Blease, Åsa Cajander, Catherine DesRoches, Asbjørn Johansen Fagerlund, Barbara Haage, Isto Huvila, Iiris Hörhammer, Bridget Kane, Gunnar O Klein, Eli Kristiansen, Kerli Luks, Jonas Moll, Irene Muli, Eline Hovstad Raphaug, Hanife Rexhepi, Sara Riggare, Peeter Ross, Isabella Scandurra, Saija Simola, Hedvig Soone, Bo Wang, Maedeh Ghorbanian Zolbin, Rose-Mharie Åhlfeldt, Sari Kujala, Monika Alise Johansen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 13.11.2023.
Références
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 08;6:2013
pubmed: 26779108
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 06;21(5):e13876
pubmed: 31066717
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):415-9
pubmed: 27029590
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 14;8(12):e34170
pubmed: 34904956
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):812-9
pubmed: 21697291
Health Syst Transit. 2019 Aug;21(2):1-166
pubmed: 31596240
BMJ. 2021 Feb 18;372:n426
pubmed: 33602667
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 01;20(11):e278
pubmed: 30389647
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec 21;73(726):e67-e74
pubmed: 36316163
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Oct 31;10(4):e34
pubmed: 18974036
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):534
pubmed: 28784173
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Feb 02;5(1):e11
pubmed: 29396386
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):e26189
pubmed: 34494966
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:495-499
pubmed: 35612129
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):121-6
pubmed: 16357345
J Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 2;:
pubmed: 35918134
Health Syst Transit. 2018 Mar;20(1):1-189
pubmed: 30277217
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:504-508
pubmed: 31437974
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jun;102:50-61
pubmed: 28495348
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 6;24(6):e37438
pubmed: 35666563
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;156:171-7
pubmed: 20543352
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 22;25:e43496
pubmed: 36811939
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e45974
pubmed: 37389909
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103007
pubmed: 31785449
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 7;22(2):e16144
pubmed: 32031538
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:723-727
pubmed: 29295193