Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of Gleditsia sinensis seedlings under drought-rehydration state.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 11 2023
Historique:
received: 17 08 2023
accepted: 19 10 2023
medline: 17 11 2023
pubmed: 16 11 2023
entrez: 15 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

G. sinensis is a crucial tree species in China, possessing important economic and ecological value, and having a wide geographical distribution. G. sinensis seedlings is highly vulnerable to the drought-rehydration-drought cycle during their growth, and there is a lack of quantitative and systematic research on the physiological mechanisms of drought resistance and rehydration in G. sinensis. There is also a lack of good drought-resistant families and reliable methods for evaluating drought resistance, which severely hinders the selection and promotion of drought-resistant G. sinensis families and the industry's development. Therefore, this study selection 58 families seedlings of G. sinensis to drought stress and rehydration using an artificial simulated water control method in potted seedlings. The aim was to compare the effects of different levels of drought and rehydration on the growth and physiological indices of seedlings from different families. Identification of drought-resistant families and dependable drought related indices and techniques, the explanation of divergence in drought stress effects on various drought-resistant seedlings and the mechanisms underpinning growth and physiological responses, and the provision of theoretical reference for G. sinensis drought-resistant variety selection and cultivation. The Drought Resistance Index (DRI) served as the primary indicator, supplemented by growth, leaf morphology, and photosynthetic physiological indicators, to thoroughly assess and identify five distinct drought tolerant taxa while also selecting five representative families. Soluble protein (SP), proline (Pro), and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents, as well as the activities of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in seedlings from the five families, increased as the degree of drought intensified. The highest values were appeared during periods of severe drought, and gradually decreased after subsequent rehydration. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed MDA and soluble sugars (SS) as the primary predictors of drought and rehydration response in G. sinensis seedlings respectively. Changes in osmoregulatory substance content and increased antioxidant enzyme activity may be crucial for responding to drought tolerance mechanisms. Leaf morphological indicators, seedling height, soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value, photosynthetic indicators, and MDA are dependable parameters for assessing the drought tolerance of G. sinensis seedlings. When assessing the drought-resistance of seedlings using physiological indicators such as photosynthesis, a comprehensive analysis should incorporate multiple indicators and methods. This evaluation approach could serve as a reference for screening exceptional drought-resistant families of G. sinensis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37968307
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45394-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-45394-8
pmc: PMC10651932
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antioxidants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19963

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Genetics. 2006 Feb;172(2):1213-28
pubmed: 16272419
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3890
pubmed: 30846745
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 3;10(1):18913
pubmed: 33144613
Amino Acids. 2008 Nov;35(4):753-9
pubmed: 18379856
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Dec;109:54-61
pubmed: 27639065
Plant Cell Environ. 2014 Feb;37(2):300-11
pubmed: 23790054
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Aug;7(4):472-9
pubmed: 15231272
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7711):531-539
pubmed: 29950621
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jul 07;13:945441
pubmed: 35982691
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Jan 15;101(1):307-314
pubmed: 32623742
Plants (Basel). 2020 Oct 19;9(10):
pubmed: 33086523
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 05;20(18):
pubmed: 31491923
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2012 Oct;23(10):2907-15
pubmed: 23359957
Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:421-31
pubmed: 2233309
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 05;13:851942
pubmed: 35991406
Antioxidants (Basel). 2022 Mar 03;11(3):
pubmed: 35326148
Science. 2020 Apr 17;368(6488):266-269
pubmed: 32299946
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Sep;118:427-437
pubmed: 28711792

Auteurs

Fuhua Liu (F)

Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.

Yang Zhao (Y)

Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China. zhy737@126.com.

Xiurong Wang (X)

Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.

Biao Wang (B)

Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.

Feng Xiao (F)

Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.

Kequan He (K)

The State-Owned Forest Farm of Dushan County, Dushan, 558200, Guizhou, China.

Articles similaires

Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Citrus Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase Stress, Physiological Multigene Family Phylogeny
Sorghum Antioxidants Phosphorus Fertilizers Flavonoids

Classifications MeSH