A Re-Evaluation of African Swine Fever Genotypes Based on p72 Sequences Reveals the Existence of Only Six Distinct p72 Groups.
ASFV
African swine fever
genotype
p72
Journal
Viruses
ISSN: 1999-4915
Titre abrégé: Viruses
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101509722
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Nov 2023
11 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
13
09
2023
revised:
07
11
2023
accepted:
09
11
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
25
11
2023
entrez:
25
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The African swine fever virus (ASFV) is currently causing a world-wide pandemic of a highly lethal disease in domestic swine and wild boar. Currently, recombinant ASF live-attenuated vaccines based on a genotype II virus strain are commercially available in Vietnam. With 25 reported ASFV genotypes in the literature, it is important to understand the molecular basis and usefulness of ASFV genotyping, as well as the true significance of genotypes in the epidemiology, transmission, evolution, control, and prevention of ASFV. Historically, genotyping of ASFV was used for the epidemiological tracking of the disease and was based on the analysis of small fragments that represent less than 1% of the viral genome. The predominant method for genotyping ASFV relies on the sequencing of a fragment within the gene encoding the structural p72 protein. Genotype assignment has been accomplished through automated phylogenetic trees or by comparing the target sequence to the most closely related genotyped p72 gene. To evaluate its appropriateness for the classification of genotypes by p72, we reanalyzed all available genomic data for ASFV. We conclude that the majority of p72-based genotypes, when initially created, were neither identified under any specific methodological criteria nor correctly compared with the already existing ASFV genotypes. Based on our analysis of the p72 protein sequences, we propose that the current twenty-five genotypes, created exclusively based on the p72 sequence, should be reduced to only six genotypes. To help differentiate between the new and old genotype classification systems, we propose that Arabic numerals (1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 23) be used instead of the previously used Roman numerals. Furthermore, we discuss the usefulness of genotyping ASFV isolates based only on the p72 gene sequence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38005923
pii: v15112246
doi: 10.3390/v15112246
pmc: PMC10675559
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Foundation for Food and Agriculture
ID : 21-000064
Organisme : National Pork Board
ID : 21-137
Références
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Oct;64(5):1393-1404
pubmed: 27211823
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Oct 25;8(4):
pubmed: 33113838
Arch Virol. 2003 Apr;148(4):693-706
pubmed: 12664294
Viruses. 2023 Aug 11;15(8):
pubmed: 37632064
J Virol. 2017 Oct 13;91(21):
pubmed: 28814514
Virus Evol. 2020 Jun 19;6(2):veaa044
pubmed: 32913663
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Feb 1;35(2):518-522
pubmed: 29077904
Viruses. 2023 Apr 02;15(4):
pubmed: 37112895
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jan;43(1):112-9
pubmed: 15634958
Microb Genom. 2023 Jul;9(7):
pubmed: 37489884
Virol J. 2020 Sep 3;17(1):135
pubmed: 32883295
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;17(4):599-605
pubmed: 21470447
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 May 1;37(5):1530-1534
pubmed: 32011700
Arch Virol. 2005 Dec;150(12):2439-52
pubmed: 16052280
Pathogens. 2023 Jul 06;12(7):
pubmed: 37513759
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 25;8(1):6510
pubmed: 29695831
PLoS Pathog. 2022 Nov 9;18(11):e1010931
pubmed: 36350837
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Sep;68(5):2640-2642
pubmed: 34102005