Development and validation of quantitative PCR assays for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Journal
The Lancet. Microbe
ISSN: 2666-5247
Titre abrégé: Lancet Microbe
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101769019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
26
01
2023
revised:
27
09
2023
accepted:
26
10
2023
medline:
11
3
2024
pubmed:
12
2
2024
entrez:
11
2
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis is the second leading cause of AIDS-related deaths, with a 10-week mortality rate of 25-30%. Fungal load assessed by colony-forming unit (CFU) counts is used as a prognostic marker and to monitor response to treatment in research studies. PCR-based assessment of fungal load could be quicker and less labour-intensive. We sought to design, optimise, and validate quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for the detection, identification, and quantification of Cryptococcus infections in patients with cryptococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa. We developed and validated species-specific qPCR assays based on DNA amplification of QSP1 (QSP1A specific to Cryptococcus neoformans, QSP1B/C specific to Cryptococcus deneoformans, and QSP1D specific to Cryptococcus gattii species) and a pan-Cryptococcus assay based on a multicopy 28S rRNA gene. This was a longitudinal study that validated the designed assays on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 209 patients with cryptococcal meningitis at baseline (day 0) and during anti-fungal therapy (day 7 and day 14), from the AMBITION-cm trial in Botswana and Malawi (2018-21). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and presenting with a first case of cryptococcal meningitis. When compared with quantitative cryptococcal culture as the reference, the sensitivity of the 28S rRNA was 98·2% (95% CI 95·1-99·5) and of the QSP1 assay was 90·4% (85·2-94·0) in CSF at day 0. Quantification of the fungal load with QSP1 and 28S rRNA qPCR correlated with quantitative cryptococcal culture (R QSP1 and 28S rRNA assays are useful in identifying Cryptococcus species. qPCR results correlate well with baseline quantitative cryptococcal culture and show a similar decline in fungal load during induction therapy. These assays could be a faster alternative to quantitative cryptococcal culture to determine fungal load clearance. The clinical implications of the possible detection of viable but non-culturable cells in CSF during induction therapy remain unclear. European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership; Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency; Wellcome Trust/UK Medical Research Council/UKAID Joint Global Health Trials; and UK National Institute for Health Research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis is the second leading cause of AIDS-related deaths, with a 10-week mortality rate of 25-30%. Fungal load assessed by colony-forming unit (CFU) counts is used as a prognostic marker and to monitor response to treatment in research studies. PCR-based assessment of fungal load could be quicker and less labour-intensive. We sought to design, optimise, and validate quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for the detection, identification, and quantification of Cryptococcus infections in patients with cryptococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa.
METHODS
METHODS
We developed and validated species-specific qPCR assays based on DNA amplification of QSP1 (QSP1A specific to Cryptococcus neoformans, QSP1B/C specific to Cryptococcus deneoformans, and QSP1D specific to Cryptococcus gattii species) and a pan-Cryptococcus assay based on a multicopy 28S rRNA gene. This was a longitudinal study that validated the designed assays on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 209 patients with cryptococcal meningitis at baseline (day 0) and during anti-fungal therapy (day 7 and day 14), from the AMBITION-cm trial in Botswana and Malawi (2018-21). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and presenting with a first case of cryptococcal meningitis.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
When compared with quantitative cryptococcal culture as the reference, the sensitivity of the 28S rRNA was 98·2% (95% CI 95·1-99·5) and of the QSP1 assay was 90·4% (85·2-94·0) in CSF at day 0. Quantification of the fungal load with QSP1 and 28S rRNA qPCR correlated with quantitative cryptococcal culture (R
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
QSP1 and 28S rRNA assays are useful in identifying Cryptococcus species. qPCR results correlate well with baseline quantitative cryptococcal culture and show a similar decline in fungal load during induction therapy. These assays could be a faster alternative to quantitative cryptococcal culture to determine fungal load clearance. The clinical implications of the possible detection of viable but non-culturable cells in CSF during induction therapy remain unclear.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership; Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency; Wellcome Trust/UK Medical Research Council/UKAID Joint Global Health Trials; and UK National Institute for Health Research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38342110
pii: S2666-5247(23)00362-2
doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00362-2
pmc: PMC10914677
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 28S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e261-e271Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/V033417/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Investigateurs
J Goodall
(J)
N Mawoko
(N)
J Milburn
(J)
R Mmipi
(R)
C Muthoga
(C)
P Ponatshego
(P)
I Rulaganyang
(I)
K Seatla
(K)
N Tlhako
(N)
K Tsholo
(K)
S April
(S)
A Bekiswa
(A)
L Boloko
(L)
H Bookholane
(H)
T Crede
(T)
L Davids
(L)
R Goliath
(R)
S Hlungulu
(S)
R Hoffman
(R)
H Kyepa
(H)
N Masina
(N)
D Maughan
(D)
T Mnguni
(T)
S Moosa
(S)
T Morar
(T)
M Mpalali
(M)
J Naude
(J)
I Oliphant
(I)
S Sayed
(S)
L Sebesho
(L)
M Shey
(M)
L Swanepoel
(L)
M Chasweka
(M)
W Chimang'anga
(W)
T Chimphambano
(T)
E Dziwani
(E)
E Gondwe
(E)
A Kadzilimbile
(A)
S Kateta
(S)
E Kossam
(E)
C Kukacha
(C)
B Lipenga
(B)
J Ndaferankhande
(J)
M Ndalama
(M)
R Shah
(R)
A Singini
(A)
K Stott
(K)
A Zambasa
(A)
T Banda
(T)
T Chikaonda
(T)
G Chitulo
(G)
L Chiwoko
(L)
N Chome
(N)
M Gwin
(M)
T Kachitosi
(T)
B Kamanga
(B)
M Kazembe
(M)
E Kumwenda
(E)
M Kumwenda
(M)
C Maya
(C)
W Mhango
(W)
C Mphande
(C)
L Msumba
(L)
T Munthali
(T)
D Ngoma
(D)
S Nicholas
(S)
L Simwinga
(L)
A Stambuli
(A)
G Tegha
(G)
J Zambezi
(J)
C Ahimbisibwe
(C)
A Akampurira
(A)
A Alice
(A)
F Cresswell
(F)
J Gakuru
(J)
D Kiiza
(D)
J Kisembo
(J)
R Kwizera
(R)
F Kugonza
(F)
E Laker
(E)
T Luggya
(T)
A Lule
(A)
A Musubire
(A)
R Muyise
(R)
O Namujju
(O)
J Ndyetukira
(J)
L Nsangi
(L)
M Okirwoth
(M)
A Sadiq
(A)
K Tadeo
(K)
A Tukundane
(A)
D Williams
(D)
L Atwine
(L)
P Buzaare
(P)
M Collins
(M)
N Emily
(N)
C Inyakuwa
(C)
S Kariisa
(S)
J Mwesigye
(J)
S Niwamanya
(S)
A Rodgers
(A)
J Rukundo
(J)
I Rwomushana
(I)
M Ssemusu
(M)
G Stead
(G)
K Boyd
(K)
S Gondo
(S)
P Kufa
(P)
E Makaha
(E)
C Moyo
(C)
T Mtisi
(T)
S Mudzingwa
(S)
T Mwarumba
(T)
T Zinyandu
(T)
F Dromer
(F)
P Johnstone
(P)
S Hafeez
(S)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests AA received honoraria for educational activities and webinars from Gilead Sciences and Pfizer and travel grants from Astellas and Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.