Training Student Pharmacists in Microaggressions and Gender Inclusive Communication.

The objectives of this study were to describe the implementation of a microaggression and gender inclusive communication (MGIC) module in a required course in a Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum; and to evaluate the impact on student pharmacist knowledge, comfort, and confidence using gender inclusive communication and addressing microaggressions. Students participated in MGIC module, which included training on microaggressions, and terminology related to gender. The module implementation was evaluated through a pre and post training knowledge assessment and survey of student confidence, comfort, and perceived importance of gender inclusive care. Additional evaluation included qualitative review of the graphics depicting the terminology and rephrasing statement with a microaggression to inclusive language. Survey responses were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test and knowledge responses were analyzed using the Fisher exact test in SPSS. A total of 106 students completed the module, 105 completed presurvey and knowledge assessment, and 92 completed the postsurvey and knowledge assessment. Results demonstrated a statistically significant increase from pre to post on the comfort and importance domain questions. A statistically significant increase in the student confidence was seen on all questions except for 2. The pre and postknowledge assessment results on all questions showed improvement from pre to post, although not all changes were statistically significant. The MGIC module was effective in increasing to evaluate the impact on student pharmacist knowledge, comfort, and confidence using gender inclusive communication and addressing microaggressions. Reflections echoed the value and need for this training.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.