Mechanisms of action and resistance in histone methylation-targeted therapy.
Adult
Humans
Chromatin
/ chemistry
DNA Methylation
/ drug effects
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
/ drug effects
Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Epigenesis, Genetic
/ drug effects
Genes, Tumor Suppressor
/ drug effects
Histones
/ chemistry
Homeostasis
/ drug effects
Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell
/ drug therapy
Lysine
/ chemistry
Methylation
/ drug effects
Mutation
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2
/ genetics
Single-Cell Analysis
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
06
07
2022
accepted:
23
01
2024
medline:
8
3
2024
pubmed:
22
2
2024
entrez:
21
2
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Epigenomes enable the rectification of disordered cancer gene expression, thereby providing new targets for pharmacological interventions. The clinical utility of targeting histone H3 lysine trimethylation (H3K27me3) as an epigenetic hallmark has been demonstrated
Identifiants
pubmed: 38383791
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07103-x
pii: 10.1038/s41586-024-07103-x
pmc: PMC10917674
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chromatin
0
DNMT3A protein, human
0
Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein
EC 2.1.1.43
EZH1 protein, human
EC 2.1.1.43
EZH2 protein, human
EC 2.1.1.43
Histones
0
Lysine
K3Z4F929H6
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2
EC 2.1.1.43
TET2 protein, human
EC 1.13.11.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
221-228Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Margueron, R. & Reinberg, D. The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature 469, 343–349 (2011).
pubmed: 21248841
pmcid: 3760771
doi: 10.1038/nature09784
Yamagishi, M. & Uchimaru, K. Targeting EZH2 in cancer therapy. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 29, 375–381 (2017).
pubmed: 28665819
doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000390
Bhat, K. P., Kaniskan, H. U., Jin, J. & Gozani, O. Epigenetics and beyond: targeting writers of protein lysine methylation to treat disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 265–286 (2021).
pubmed: 33469207
pmcid: 8035164
doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-00108-x
Morschhauser, F. et al. Tazemetostat for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 21, 1433–1442 (2020).
pubmed: 33035457
pmcid: 8427481
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30441-1
Gounder, M. et al. Tazemetostat in advanced epithelioid sarcoma with loss of INI1/SMARCB1: an international, open-label, phase 2 basket study. Lancet Oncol. 21, 1423–1432 (2020).
pubmed: 33035459
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30451-4
Morishima, S. et al. First-in-human study of the EZH1/2 dual inhibitor valemetostat in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) — updated results focusing on adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL). Blood 134, 4025 (2019).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-125507
Izutsu, K. et al. An open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial of valemetostat for relapsed or refractory adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Blood 141, 1159–1168 (2023).
pubmed: 36150143
doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016862
Margueron, R. et al. Ezh1 and Ezh2 maintain repressive chromatin through different mechanisms. Mol. Cell 32, 503–518 (2008).
pubmed: 19026781
pmcid: 3641558
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.004
Shen, X. et al. EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency. Mol. Cell 32, 491–502 (2008).
pubmed: 19026780
pmcid: 2630502
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.016
Yamagishi, M. et al. Targeting excessive EZH1 and EZH2 activities for abnormal histone methylation and transcription network in malignant lymphomas. Cell Rep. 29, 2321–2337.e7 (2019).
pubmed: 31747604
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.083
Honma, D. et al. Novel orally bioavailable EZH1/2 dual inhibitors with greater antitumor efficacy than an EZH2 selective inhibitor. Cancer Sci. 108, 2069–2078 (2017).
pubmed: 28741798
pmcid: 5623739
doi: 10.1111/cas.13326
Katsuya, H. et al. Treatment and survival among 1594 patients with ATL. Blood 126, 2570–2577 (2015).
pubmed: 26361794
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-632489
Cook, L. B. et al. Revised adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma international consensus meeting report. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 677–687 (2019).
pubmed: 30657736
pmcid: 6494249
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00501
Yamagishi, M. et al. Polycomb-mediated loss of miR-31 activates NIK-dependent NF-κB pathway in adult T cell leukemia and other cancers. Cancer Cell 21, 121–135 (2012).
pubmed: 22264793
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.12.015
Fujikawa, D. et al. Polycomb-dependent epigenetic landscape in adult T-cell leukemia. Blood 127, 1790–1802 (2016).
pubmed: 26773042
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-662593
Kataoka, K. et al. Integrated molecular analysis of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 47, 1304–1315 (2015).
pubmed: 26437031
doi: 10.1038/ng.3415
Kataoka, K. et al. Aberrant PD-L1 expression through 3′-UTR disruption in multiple cancers. Nature 534, 402–406 (2016).
pubmed: 27281199
doi: 10.1038/nature18294
Yamagishi, M. et al. Chronological genome and single-cell transcriptome integration characterizes the evolutionary process of adult T cell leukemia-lymphoma. Nat. Commun. 12, 4821 (2021).
pubmed: 34376672
pmcid: 8355240
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25101-9
Kataoka, K. et al. Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Blood 131, 215–225 (2018).
pubmed: 29084771
pmcid: 5757690
doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-761874
Kobayashi, S. et al. CADM1 expression and stepwise downregulation of CD7 are closely associated with clonal expansion of HTLV-I-infected cells in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 2851–2861 (2014).
pubmed: 24727323
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3169
Cai, Y. et al. H3K27me3-rich genomic regions can function as silencers to repress gene expression via chromatin interactions. Nat. Commun. 12, 719 (2021).
pubmed: 33514712
pmcid: 7846766
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20940-y
Zhao, M., Sun, J. & Zhao, Z. TSGene: a web resource for tumor suppressor genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D970–D976 (2013).
pubmed: 23066107
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks937
Allis, C. D. & Jenuwein, T. The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 487–500 (2016).
pubmed: 27346641
doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.59
Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587 (2021).
pubmed: 34062119
pmcid: 8238499
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048
Baker, T. et al. Acquisition of a single EZH2 D1 domain mutation confers acquired resistance to EZH2-targeted inhibitors. Oncotarget 6, 32646–32655 (2015).
pubmed: 26360609
pmcid: 4741719
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5066
Gibaja, V. et al. Development of secondary mutations in wild-type and mutant EZH2 alleles cooperates to confer resistance to EZH2 inhibitors. Oncogene 35, 558–566 (2016).
pubmed: 25893294
doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.114
O’Hare, T. et al. AP24534, a pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor for chronic myeloid leukemia, potently inhibits the T315I mutant and overcomes mutation-based resistance. Cancer Cell 16, 401–412 (2009).
pubmed: 19878872
pmcid: 2804470
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.028
Eide, C. A. et al. Combining the allosteric inhibitor asciminib with ponatinib suppresses emergence of and restores efficacy against highly resistant BCR-ABL1 mutants. Cancer Cell 36, 431–443 (2019).
pubmed: 31543464
pmcid: 6893878
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.08.004
Shah, M. et al. A transcript-specific eIF3 complex mediates global translational control of energy metabolism. Cell Rep. 16, 1891–1902 (2016).
pubmed: 27477275
pmcid: 4988921
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.006
Lamper, A. M., Fleming, R. H., Ladd, K. M. & Lee, A. S. Y. A phosphorylation-regulated eIF3d translation switch mediates cellular adaptation to metabolic stress. Science 370, 853–856 (2020).
pubmed: 33184215
doi: 10.1126/science.abb0993
Lee, A. S. Y., Kranzusch, P. J., Doudna, J. A. & Cate, J. H. D. eIF3d is an mRNA cap-binding protein that is required for specialized translation initiation. Nature 536, 96–99 (2016).
pubmed: 27462815
pmcid: 5003174
doi: 10.1038/nature18954
Thacker, J. S. et al. Unlocking the brain: a new method for western blot protein detection from fixed brain tissue. J. Neurosci. Methods 348, 108995 (2021).
pubmed: 33202258
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108995
Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380–1389 (2013).
pubmed: 23992846
pmcid: 3856256
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021
Yuan, W. et al. Dense chromatin activates Polycomb repressive complex 2 to regulate H3 lysine 27 methylation. Science 337, 971–975 (2012).
pubmed: 22923582
doi: 10.1126/science.1225237
Porazzi, P. et al. Targeting chemotherapy to decondensed H3K27me3-marked chromatin of AML cells enhances leukemia suppression. Cancer Res. 82, 458–471 (2022).
pubmed: 34903608
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1297
Boumahdi, S. & Sauvage, F. J. de The great escape: tumour cell plasticity in resistance to targeted therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 39–56 (2020).
pubmed: 31601994
doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0044-1
Marine, J.-C., Dawson, S.-J. & Dawson, M. A. Non-genetic mechanisms of therapeutic resistance in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 743–756 (2020).
pubmed: 33033407
doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00302-4
Shimoyama, M. Diagnostic criteria and classification of clinical sub- types of adult T-cell leukaemia-lymphoma. A report from the Lymphoma Study Group (1984–87). Br. J. Haematol. 79, 428–437 (1991).
pubmed: 1751370
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1991.tb08051.x
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943
pmcid: 2723002
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 213–219 (2013).
pubmed: 23396013
pmcid: 3833702
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2514
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from next-generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010).
pubmed: 20601685
pmcid: 2938201
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603
Roth, A. et al. PyClone: statistical inference of clonal population structure in cancer. Nat. Methods 11, 396–398 (2014).
pubmed: 24633410
pmcid: 4864026
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2883
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, 10–12 (2011).
doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Boeva, V. et al. Control-FREEC: a tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 423–425 (2012).
pubmed: 22155870
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr670
Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A. & Satija, R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nat. Methods 18, 1333–1341 (2021).
pubmed: 34725479
pmcid: 9255697
doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01282-5
Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).
pubmed: 31740819
pmcid: 6884693
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0
Lerdrup, M., Johansen, J. V., Agrawal-Singh, S. & Hansen, K. An interactive environment for agile analysis and visualization of ChIP-sequencing data. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 349–357 (2016).
pubmed: 26926434
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3180
Ramírez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
pubmed: 27079975
pmcid: 4987876
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw257
Sakamoto, Y. et al. Long-read whole-genome methylation patterning using enzymatic base conversion and nanopore sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e81 (2021).
pubmed: 34019650
pmcid: 8373077
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab397
Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for bisulfite-seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571–1572 (2011).
pubmed: 21493656
pmcid: 3102221
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167
Jühling, F. et al. metilene: Fast and sensitive calling of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Res. 26, 256–262 (2016).
pubmed: 26631489
pmcid: 4728377
doi: 10.1101/gr.196394.115
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative Genomics Viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
pubmed: 21221095
pmcid: 3346182
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754
Ge, S. X., Son, E. W. & Yao, R. iDEP: an integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 534 (2018).
pubmed: 30567491
pmcid: 6299935
doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2486-6
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
pmcid: 1239896
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Wang, L. et al. Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2695–2703 (2015).
pubmed: 25625324
doi: 10.1021/ja512751q
Steinbrecher, T. et al. Predicting the effect of amino acid single-point mutations on protein stability-large-scale validation of MD-based relative free energy calculations. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 948–963 (2017).
pubmed: 27964946
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.12.007
Lu, C. et al. OPLS4: improving force field accuracy on challenging regimes of chemical space. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 4291–4300 (2021).
pubmed: 34096718
doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00302
Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3406–3415 (2003).
pubmed: 12824337
pmcid: 169194
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595