A new look at physicians' responses to financial incentives: Quality of care, practice characteristics, and motivations.

Attitudes Behavioral experiment Data linkage Motivations Pay for performance Physician characteristics Practice characteristics

Journal

Journal of health economics
ISSN: 1879-1646
Titre abrégé: J Health Econ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8410622

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 14 02 2023
revised: 26 01 2024
accepted: 31 01 2024
medline: 18 3 2024
pubmed: 25 2 2024
entrez: 24 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is considerable controversy about what causes (in)effectiveness of physician performance pay in improving the quality of care. Using a behavioral experiment with German primary-care physicians, we study the incentive effect of performance pay on service provision and quality of care. To explore whether variations in quality are based on the incentive scheme and the interplay with physicians' real-world profit orientation and patient-regarding motivations, we link administrative data on practice characteristics and survey data on physicians' attitudes with experimental data. We find that, under performance pay, quality increases by about 7pp compared to baseline capitation. While the effect increases with the severity of illness, the bonus level does not significantly affect the quality of care. Data linkage indicates that primary-care physicians in high-profit practices provide a lower quality of care. Physicians' other-regarding motivations and attitudes are significant drivers of high treatment quality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38401249
pii: S0167-6296(24)00007-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102862
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102862

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Jeannette Brosig-Koch (J)

Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg and Health Economics Research Center (CINCH) Essen, Germany. Electronic address: jeannette.brosig-koch@ovgu.de.

Heike Hennig-Schmidt (H)

University of Bonn, Department of Economics, Germany. Electronic address: hschmidt@uni-bonn.de.

Nadja Kairies-Schwarz (N)

Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Centre for Health and Society (chs) and German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Germany. Electronic address: nadja.kairies-schwarz@uni-duesseldorf.de.

Johanna Kokot (J)

University of Hamburg and Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Germany. Electronic address: johanna.kokot@uni-hamburg.de.

Daniel Wiesen (D)

University of Cologne, Department of Healthcare Management and Center for Social and Economic Behavior (C-SEB), Germany. Electronic address: wiesen@wiso.uni-koeln.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH