Prednisolone Versus Colchicine for Acute Gout in Primary Care: statistical analysis plan for the pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, and double-blinded COPAGO non-inferiority trial.
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Apr 2024
03 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
17
01
2024
accepted:
15
03
2024
medline:
5
4
2024
pubmed:
4
4
2024
entrez:
3
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To date, colchicine and prednisolone are two effective therapies for the treatment of acute gout but have never been compared directly in a randomized clinical trial. In addition, in previous trials of treating acute gout patients with concomitant comorbidities were often excluded due to contraindications to naproxen. This pragmatic, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, non-inferiority trial compares prednisolone with colchicine in terms of non-inferiority in patients with acute gout. Patients presenting to their general practitioner with acute gout can be included if the gout attack has occurred within the last 2 days. A total of 60 practices in the vicinity of three university medical centers (Greifswald, Göttingen, and Würzburg) participate in the study. The intervention group receives 30 mg prednisolone for 5 days, while the group of standard care receives low-dose colchicine (day 1: 1.5 mg; days 2-5: 1 mg). The first dose of treatment is provided at day 0 when patients present to the general practitioner due to an acute gout attack. From day 0 to day 6, patients will be asked to complete a study diary on daily basis regarding pain quantification. For safety reasons, potential side effects and the course of systolic blood pressure are also assessed. N = 314 patients have to be recruited to compensate for 10% of dropout and to allow for showing non-inferiority of prednisolone compared to colchicine with a power of 90%. We use permuted block randomization with block sizes of 2, 4, and 6 to avoid imbalanced treatment arms in this multi-center study; patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The absolute level of pain on day 3 (in the last 24 h) is the primary outcome and measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS: 0-10). Using a multiple linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, and pain at baseline, prednisolone is considered non-inferior if the effect estimate including the confidence intervals is lower than a margin of 1 unit on the NRS. Average response to treatment, joint swelling and tenderness, physical function of the joint, and patients' global assessment of treatment success are secondary outcomes. The trial will provide evidence from a direct comparison of colchicine and prednisolone regarding their efficacy of pain reduction in acute gout patients of primary care and to indicate possible safety signals. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05698680 first posted on January 26, 2023 (retrospectively registered).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To date, colchicine and prednisolone are two effective therapies for the treatment of acute gout but have never been compared directly in a randomized clinical trial. In addition, in previous trials of treating acute gout patients with concomitant comorbidities were often excluded due to contraindications to naproxen.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
This pragmatic, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, non-inferiority trial compares prednisolone with colchicine in terms of non-inferiority in patients with acute gout. Patients presenting to their general practitioner with acute gout can be included if the gout attack has occurred within the last 2 days. A total of 60 practices in the vicinity of three university medical centers (Greifswald, Göttingen, and Würzburg) participate in the study. The intervention group receives 30 mg prednisolone for 5 days, while the group of standard care receives low-dose colchicine (day 1: 1.5 mg; days 2-5: 1 mg). The first dose of treatment is provided at day 0 when patients present to the general practitioner due to an acute gout attack. From day 0 to day 6, patients will be asked to complete a study diary on daily basis regarding pain quantification. For safety reasons, potential side effects and the course of systolic blood pressure are also assessed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN
UNASSIGNED
N = 314 patients have to be recruited to compensate for 10% of dropout and to allow for showing non-inferiority of prednisolone compared to colchicine with a power of 90%. We use permuted block randomization with block sizes of 2, 4, and 6 to avoid imbalanced treatment arms in this multi-center study; patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The absolute level of pain on day 3 (in the last 24 h) is the primary outcome and measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS: 0-10). Using a multiple linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, and pain at baseline, prednisolone is considered non-inferior if the effect estimate including the confidence intervals is lower than a margin of 1 unit on the NRS. Average response to treatment, joint swelling and tenderness, physical function of the joint, and patients' global assessment of treatment success are secondary outcomes.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The trial will provide evidence from a direct comparison of colchicine and prednisolone regarding their efficacy of pain reduction in acute gout patients of primary care and to indicate possible safety signals.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05698680 first posted on January 26, 2023 (retrospectively registered).
Identifiants
pubmed: 38570873
doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08066-0
pii: 10.1186/s13063-024-08066-0
pmc: PMC10988876
doi:
Substances chimiques
Colchicine
SML2Y3J35T
Prednisolone
9PHQ9Y1OLM
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05698680']
Types de publication
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
229Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 01KG2022
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Stat Med. 1993 May 15;12(9):809-24
pubmed: 8327801
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 24;57(7):
pubmed: 34202486
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 26;8:CD006190
pubmed: 34438469
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 19;21(1):75
pubmed: 33874894
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):276-284
pubmed: 31666237
Aust N Z J Med. 1987 Jun;17(3):301-4
pubmed: 3314832
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):29-42
pubmed: 27457514
J Rheumatol. 2014 Mar;41(3):569-73
pubmed: 24334651
Control Clin Trials. 1988 Dec;9(4):365-74
pubmed: 3203526
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Jun;48(5):407-14
pubmed: 20586571
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183376
pubmed: 30646258
Pharm Stat. 2011 Jan-Feb;10(1):50-9
pubmed: 20112277
Int J Stat Med Res. 2015;4(3):287-295
pubmed: 27429686
Lancet. 2008 May 31;371(9627):1854-60
pubmed: 18514729
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Apr;62(4):1060-8
pubmed: 20131255
Stat Med. 2017 Apr 15;36(8):1302-1318
pubmed: 28028825
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1123-4
pubmed: 11701584
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 5;164(7):464-71
pubmed: 26903390
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Mar 11;22:810-7
pubmed: 26965791
BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393
pubmed: 19564179
Steroids. 2017 Dec;128:89-94
pubmed: 28899726
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91
pubmed: 17909209
BMJ. 2006 Jun 24;332(7556):1506-8
pubmed: 16793819
JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604
pubmed: 23268518
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 22;357(21):2189-94
pubmed: 18032770
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 15;(8):CD006190
pubmed: 25123076
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):100-7
pubmed: 21350618
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Jul;61(1):83-90
pubmed: 28363721