Three-dimensional printed custom-made modular talus prosthesis in patients with talus malignant tumor resection.
Humans
Talus
/ surgery
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Male
Adult
Female
Bone Neoplasms
/ surgery
Retrospective Studies
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design
Young Adult
Prosthesis Implantation
/ methods
Adolescent
Ankle Joint
/ surgery
Osseointegration
Treatment Outcome
Range of Motion, Articular
Prostheses and Implants
Custom-made modular talus prosthesis
Reconstruction
Talus tumor
Three-dimensional printed
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 May 2024
02 May 2024
Historique:
received:
14
01
2024
accepted:
06
04
2024
medline:
3
5
2024
pubmed:
3
5
2024
entrez:
2
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Talar malignant tumor is extremely rare. Currently, there are several alternative management options for talus malignant tumor including below-knee amputation, tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis, and homogenous bone transplant while their shortcomings limited the clinical application. Three-dimensional (3D) printed total talus prosthesis in talus lesion was reported as a useful method to reconstruct talus, however, most researches are case reports and its clinical effect remains unclear. Therefore, the current study was to explore the application of 3D printed custom-made modular prosthesis in talus malignant tumor. We retrospectively analyzed the patients who received the 3D printed custom-made modular prosthesis treatment due to talus malignant tumor in our hospital from February 2016 to December 2021. The patient's clinical data such as oncology outcome, operation time, and volume of blood loss were recorded. The limb function was evaluated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS-93) score, The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score; the ankle joint ranges of motion as well as the leg length discrepancy were evaluated. Plain radiography and Tomosynthesis-Shimadzu Metal Artefact Reduction Technology (T-SMART) were used to evaluate the position of prosthesis and the osseointegration. Postoperative complications were recorded. The average patients' age and the follow-up period were respectively 31.5 ± 13.1 years; and 54.8 months (range 26-72). The medium operation time was 2.4 ± 0.5 h; the intraoperative blood loss was 131.7 ± 121.4 ml. The mean MSTS-93 and AOFAS score was 26.8 and 88.5 respectively. The average plantar flexion, dorsiflexion, varus, and valgus were 32.5, 9.2, 10.8, and 5.8 degree respectively. One patient had delayed postoperative wound healing. There was no leg length discrepancy observed in any patient and good osseointegration was observed on the interface between the bone and talus prosthesis in all subjects. The modular structure of the prosthesis developed in this study seems to be convenient for prosthesis implantation and screws distribution. And the combination of solid and porous structure improves the initial stability and promotes bone integration. Therefore, 3D printed custom-made modular talus prosthesis could be an alternative option for talus reconstruction in talus malignant tumor patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Talar malignant tumor is extremely rare. Currently, there are several alternative management options for talus malignant tumor including below-knee amputation, tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis, and homogenous bone transplant while their shortcomings limited the clinical application. Three-dimensional (3D) printed total talus prosthesis in talus lesion was reported as a useful method to reconstruct talus, however, most researches are case reports and its clinical effect remains unclear. Therefore, the current study was to explore the application of 3D printed custom-made modular prosthesis in talus malignant tumor.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the patients who received the 3D printed custom-made modular prosthesis treatment due to talus malignant tumor in our hospital from February 2016 to December 2021. The patient's clinical data such as oncology outcome, operation time, and volume of blood loss were recorded. The limb function was evaluated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS-93) score, The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score; the ankle joint ranges of motion as well as the leg length discrepancy were evaluated. Plain radiography and Tomosynthesis-Shimadzu Metal Artefact Reduction Technology (T-SMART) were used to evaluate the position of prosthesis and the osseointegration. Postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The average patients' age and the follow-up period were respectively 31.5 ± 13.1 years; and 54.8 months (range 26-72). The medium operation time was 2.4 ± 0.5 h; the intraoperative blood loss was 131.7 ± 121.4 ml. The mean MSTS-93 and AOFAS score was 26.8 and 88.5 respectively. The average plantar flexion, dorsiflexion, varus, and valgus were 32.5, 9.2, 10.8, and 5.8 degree respectively. One patient had delayed postoperative wound healing. There was no leg length discrepancy observed in any patient and good osseointegration was observed on the interface between the bone and talus prosthesis in all subjects.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The modular structure of the prosthesis developed in this study seems to be convenient for prosthesis implantation and screws distribution. And the combination of solid and porous structure improves the initial stability and promotes bone integration. Therefore, 3D printed custom-made modular talus prosthesis could be an alternative option for talus reconstruction in talus malignant tumor patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38698477
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04728-6
pii: 10.1186/s13018-024-04728-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
273Subventions
Organisme : the Science and Technology Research Program of Sichuan Province
ID : 2020YFS0036
Organisme : 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
ID : ZYJC18036
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Murari TM, Callaghan JJ, Berrey BH Jr, Sweet DE. Primary benign and malignant osseous neoplasms of the foot. Foot Ankle. 1989;10(2):68–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078901000205 .
doi: 10.1177/107110078901000205
pubmed: 2807109
Patil S, de Silva MV, Crossan J, Reid R. Chondrosarcoma of the bones of the feet. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42(5):290–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1067-2516(03)00306-5 .
doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(03)00306-5
pubmed: 14566721
Young PS, Bell SW, MacDuff EM, Mahendra A. Primary osseous tumors of the hindfoot: why the delay in diagnosis and should we be concerned? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):871–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2570-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2570-6
pubmed: 23008022
Özer D, Aycan OE, Er ST, Tanrıtanır R, Arıkan Y, Kabukçuoğlu YS. Primary tumor and tumor-like lesions of bones of the foot: single-center experience of 166 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(6):1180–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.027 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.027
pubmed: 29079234
Karakoç Y, Ulucaköy C. Management and retrospective analysis of tumors and tumor-like lesions localized in the talus. Joint Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(1):218–23. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.78769 .
doi: 10.5606/ehc.2021.78769
Bakotic B, Huvos AG. Tumors of the bones of the feet: the clinicopathologic features of 150 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2001;40(5):277–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1067-2516(01)80063-6 .
doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(01)80063-6
pubmed: 11686448
Bahamonde Munoz L, Escudero HM. Massive chondroblastoma of the talus: treatment with en bloc talectomy and tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis: long-term follow-up of a case. Foot Ankle Spec. 2017;10(3):274–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016676339 .
doi: 10.1177/1938640016676339
pubmed: 27798068
Papagelopoulos PJ, Sarlikiotis T, Vottis CT, Agrogiannis G, Kontogeorgakos VA, Savvidou OD. Total talectomy and reconstruction using a 3-dimensional printed talus prosthesis for Ewing’s sarcoma: a 3.5-year follow-up. Orthopedics. 2019;42(4):e405–9. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20190523-05 .
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190523-05
pubmed: 31136673
Petrilli AS, Gentil FC, Epelman S, et al. Increased survival, limb preservation, and prognostic factors for osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1991;68(4):733–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19910815)68:4%3c733::aid-cncr2820680412%3e3.0.co;2-0 .
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910815)68:4<733::aid-cncr2820680412>3.0.co;2-0
pubmed: 1855172
Hong AM, Millington S, Ahern V, et al. Limb preservation surgery with extracorporeal irradiation in the management of malignant bone tumor: the oncological outcomes of 101 patients. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(10):2676–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt252 .
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt252
pubmed: 23852310
Rochman R, Jackson Hutson J, Alade O. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique in the presence of bone loss and infection of the talus. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(10):1001–8. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2008.1001 .
doi: 10.3113/fai.2008.1001
pubmed: 18851816
Myerson MS, Alvarez RG, Lam PW. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis for the management of severe ankle and hindfoot deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(8):643–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070002100803 .
doi: 10.1177/107110070002100803
pubmed: 10966361
Reinke C, Lotzien S, Yilmaz E, et al. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov fixator in compromised hosts: an analysis of 19 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(7):1359–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03751-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03751-0
pubmed: 33484305
Miller CP, Chiodo CP. Autologous bone graft in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Clin. 2016;21(4):825–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2016.07.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2016.07.007
pubmed: 27871415
Baumhauer J, Pinzur MS, Donahue R, Beasley W, DiGiovanni C. Site selection and pain outcome after autologous bone graft harvest. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(2):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713511434 .
doi: 10.1177/1071100713511434
pubmed: 24227683
Schmidt AH. Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard? Injury. 2021;52(Suppl 2):S18-s22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043 .
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043
pubmed: 33563416
Angthong C, Rajbhandari P. Total talar prosthesis with and without ankle ligament reconstruction using the three-dimensional computer-aided design and computer numerical control manufacturing techniques. Orthop Rev. 2020;12(3):8844. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8844 .
doi: 10.4081/or.2020.8844
Huang J, Xie F, Tan X, Xing W, Zheng Y, Zeng C. Treatment of osteosarcoma of the talus with a 3D-printed talar prosthesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;60(1):194–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2020.01.012 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.01.012
pubmed: 33162293
Yang QD, Mu MD, Tao X, Tang KL. Three-dimensional printed talar prosthesis with biological function for giant cell tumor of the talus: a case report and review of the literature. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(13):3147–56. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i13.3147 .
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i13.3147
pubmed: 33969102
pmcid: 8080752
Angthong C. Anatomic total talar prosthesis replacement surgery and ankle arthroplasty: an early case series in Thailand. Orthop Rev. 2014;6(3):5486. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5486 .
doi: 10.4081/or.2014.5486
Regauer M, Lange M, Soldan K, et al. Development of an internally braced prosthesis for total talus replacement. World J Orthop. 2017;8(3):221–8. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i3.221 .
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i3.221
pubmed: 28361015
pmcid: 5359758
Taniguchi A, Takakura Y, Sugimoto K, et al. The use of a ceramic talar body prosthesis in patients with aseptic necrosis of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2012;94(11):1529–33. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.94b11.29543 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.94b11.29543
Taniguchi A, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, et al. An alumina ceramic total talar prosthesis for osteonecrosis of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(16):1348–53. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.n.01272 .
doi: 10.2106/jbjs.n.01272
pubmed: 26290086
Tracey J, Arora D, Gross CE, Parekh SG. Custom 3D-printed total talar prostheses restore normal joint anatomy throughout the hindfoot. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019;12(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640018762567 .
doi: 10.1177/1938640018762567
pubmed: 29537314
Harnroongroj T, Harnroongroj T. The talar body prosthesis: results at ten to thirty-six years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(14):1211–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.m.00377 .
doi: 10.2106/jbjs.m.00377
pubmed: 25031376
Ando Y, Yasui T, Isawa K, Tanaka S, Tanaka Y, Takakura Y. Total talar replacement for idiopathic necrosis of the talus: a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(6):1292–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.07.015 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.07.015
pubmed: 26387058
Fang X, Liu H, Xiong Y, et al. Total talar replacement with a novel 3D printed modular prosthesis for tumors. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:1897–905. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s172442 .
doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s172442
pubmed: 30323612
pmcid: 6178937
Bos GD, Esther RJ, Woll TS. Foot tumors: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10(4):259–70. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200207000-00004 .
doi: 10.5435/00124635-200207000-00004
pubmed: 15089075
Kransdorf MJ. Benign soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of specific diagnoses by age, sex, and location. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(2):395–402. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839977 .
doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839977
pubmed: 7839977
Khal AA, Apostu D, Schiau C, Bejinariu N, Pesenti S, Jouve JL. Custom-made 3D-printed prosthesis after resection of a voluminous giant cell tumour recurrence in pelvis. Diagnostics (Basel, Switz). 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030485 .
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030485
Dennis MD, Tullos HS. Blair tibiotalar arthrodesis for injuries to the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(1):103–7.
doi: 10.2106/00004623-198062010-00015
pubmed: 7351400
Dennison MG, Pool RD, Simonis RB, Singh BS. Tibiocalcaneal fusion for avascular necrosis of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2001;83(2):199–203. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b2.11500 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b2.11500
Mann RA, Chou LB. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16(7):401–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079501600704 .
doi: 10.1177/107110079501600704
pubmed: 7550952
Wang J, Min L, Lu M, et al. Three-dimensional-printed custom-made hemipelvic endoprosthesis for the revision of the aseptic loosening and fracture of modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis: a pilot study. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01257-5 .
doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01257-5
pubmed: 34039325
pmcid: 8157625
Wang J, Min L, Lu M, et al. What are the complications of three-dimensionally printed, custom-made, integrative hemipelvic endoprostheses in patients with primary malignancies involving the acetabulum, and what is the function of these patients? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(11):2487–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000001297 .
doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001297
pubmed: 32420722
pmcid: 7594920
Buza JA 3rd, Leucht P. Fractures of the talus: current concepts and new developments. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24(4):282–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.04.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.04.008
pubmed: 29409210
Ruatti S, Corbet C, Boudissa M, et al. Total talar prosthesis replacement after talar extrusion. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(4):905–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.04.005 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.04.005
pubmed: 28633801
Stevens BW, Dolan CM, Anderson JG, Bukrey CD. Custom talar prosthesis after open talar extrusion in a pediatric patient. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(8):933–8. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2007.0933 .
doi: 10.3113/fai.2007.0933
pubmed: 17697660
Chaudhary SD, Agrawal PS, Sakharkar NS. Giant cell tumor of talus: a case report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2022;12(9):92–4. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i09.3332 .
doi: 10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i09.3332
pubmed: 36873333
pmcid: 9983400
Tupe R, Panchwagh Y, Bartakke G, Puranik R, Waghchoure C. A rare cause of ankle pain—chondrosarcoma of the talus: a case report and literature review. J Orthop Case Rep. 2022;12(8):70–4. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i08.2970 .
doi: 10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i08.2970
pubmed: 36687495
pmcid: 9831223
Sanchez-Sotelo J, Baghdadi YM, Morrey BF. Primary linked semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: a single-institution experience with 461 elbows over three decades. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(20):1741–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.00649 .
doi: 10.2106/jbjs.15.00649
pubmed: 27869626
pmcid: 5065309
Smida M, Ammar A, Fedhila F, Douira W, Sassi S. Periosteal preservation: a new technique in resection of bone high-grade malignant tumors in children-about eleven cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1):312. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02749-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02749-1
pubmed: 36155622
pmcid: 9511720
Tsukamoto S, Mavrogenis AF, Honoki K, et al. Reconstruction after talar tumor resection: a systematic review. Curr Oncol (Tor, Ont). 2022;29(12):9788–800. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29120769 .
doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120769