Assess the Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Valve with Mixed Disease versus Predominant Aortic Stenosis.
Humans
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Male
Female
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ surgery
Aged
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease
/ surgery
Propensity Score
Aged, 80 and over
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Aortic Valve
/ surgery
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Heart Valve Diseases
/ surgery
bicuspid aortic valve
device success
mixed aortic valve disease
propensity score match
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Journal
Clinical interventions in aging
ISSN: 1178-1998
Titre abrégé: Clin Interv Aging
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273480
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
30
10
2023
accepted:
04
04
2024
medline:
7
5
2024
pubmed:
7
5
2024
entrez:
7
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD), the results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are conflicting. There is limited data on the outcomes of TAVR in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and MAVD. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes after TAVR in BAV patients with MAVD and predominant aortic stenosis (PAS). Patients with BAV who underwent TAVR between January 2016 and April 2023 were included. The primary outcome was device success. The secondary endpoints were periprocedural mortality and other complications as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3). Propensity score matching was used to minimize potential confounding. A total of 262 patients were included in this study, 83 of whom had MAVD. The median age was 72 years, and 55.7% were male. The baseline comorbidity risk files were comparable between the two groups. Patients with MAVD had more mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension, larger annular and left ventricular outflow tract dimensions, and more severe calcification than PAS. In the unmatched population, MAVD patients had similar device success rate (69.9% vs 79.9%, For the bicuspid valve, patients with MAVD had a more challenging anatomy. MAVD patients associated with comparable 30-day clinical outcomes after TAVR compared to PAS patients in patients with BAV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38711477
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S447272
pii: 447272
pmc: PMC11070846
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
695-703Informations de copyright
© 2024 Wang et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this work.