A retrospective multicenter study on clinical and serological parameters in patients with MuSK myasthenia gravis with and without general immunosuppression.
Humans
Myasthenia Gravis
/ immunology
Male
Middle Aged
Female
Adult
Aged
Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
/ immunology
Receptors, Cholinergic
/ immunology
Immunoglobulin G
/ blood
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult
Adolescent
Autoantibodies
/ blood
Aged, 80 and over
Immunosuppression Therapy
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Severity of Illness Index
Child
IgG4
IgG4 autoimmune disease
MuSK myasthenia gravis
corticosteroids
prednisolone
prednisone
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
23
10
2023
accepted:
25
03
2024
medline:
8
5
2024
pubmed:
8
5
2024
entrez:
8
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)- myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by pathogenic autoantibodies against MuSK that correlate with disease severity and are predominantly of the IgG4 subclass. The first-line treatment for MuSK-MG is general immunosuppression with corticosteroids, but the effect of treatment on IgG4 and MuSK IgG4 levels has not been studied. We analyzed the clinical data and sera from 52 MuSK-MG patients (45 female, 7 male, median age 49 (range 17-79) years) from Italy, the Netherlands, Greece and Belgium, and 43 AChR-MG patients (22 female, 21 male, median age 63 (range 2-82) years) from Italy, receiving different types of immunosuppression, and sera from 46 age- and sex-matched non-disease controls (with no diagnosed diseases, 38 female, 8 male, median age 51.5 (range 20-68) years) from the Netherlands. We analyzed the disease severity (assessed by MGFA or QMG score), and measured concentrations of MuSK IgG4, MuSK IgG, total IgG4 and total IgG in the sera by ELISA, RIA and nephelometry. We observed that MuSK-MG patients showed a robust clinical improvement and reduction of MuSK IgG after therapy, and that MuSK IgG4 concentrations, but not total IgG4 concentrations, correlated with clinical severity. MuSK IgG and MuSK IgG4 concentrations were reduced after immunosuppression in 4/5 individuals with before-after data, but data from non-linked patient samples showed no difference. Total serum IgG4 levels were within the normal range, with IgG4 levels above threshold (1.35g/L) in 1/52 MuSK-MG, 2/43 AChR-MG patients and 1/45 non-disease controls. MuSK-MG patients improved within the first four years after disease onset, but no further clinical improvement or reduction of MuSK IgG4 were observed four years later, and only 14/52 (26.92%) patients in total, of which 13 (93.3%) received general immunosuppression, reached clinical remission. We conclude that MuSK-MG patients improve clinically with general immunosuppression but may require further treatment to reach remission. Longitudinal testing of individual patients may be clinically more useful than single measurements of MuSK IgG4. No significant differences in the serum IgG4 concentrations and IgG4/IgG ratio between AChR- and MuSK-MG patients were found during follow-up. Further studies with larger patient and control cohorts are necessary to validate the findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38715598
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1325171
pmc: PMC11074957
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptors, Cholinergic
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
MUSK protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Autoantibodies
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1325171Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Koneczny, Mané-Damas, Zong, De Haas, Huda, van Kruining, Damoiseaux, De Rosa, Maestri, Guida, Molenaar, Van Damme, Fichtenbaum, Perkmann, De Baets, Lazaridis, Zouvelou, Tzartos, Ricciardi, Losen and Martinez-Martinez.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
PD participated in advisory board meetings for Pfizer, Biogen, Cytokinetics, CSL Behring, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, argenx, UCB, Muna Therapeutics, Alector, QurAlis and Ferrer. Author ST was employed by company Tzartos NeuroDiagnostics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.