Comparative transcriptomic and physiological analyses unravel wheat source root adaptation to phosphorous deficiency.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 05 2024
Historique:
received: 19 01 2024
accepted: 09 05 2024
medline: 15 5 2024
pubmed: 15 5 2024
entrez: 14 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Phosphorus (P) is a crucial macronutrient for plant growth and development. Basic metabolic processes regulate growth; however, the molecular detail of these pathways under low phosphorous (LP) in wheat is still unclear. This study aims to elucidate the varied regulatory pathways responses to LP stress in wheat genotypes. Phenotypic, physiological, and transcriptome analyses were conducted on Fielder (P efficient) and Ardito (P inefficient) wheat genotypes after four days of normal phosphorous (NP) and LP stress. In response to LP, Fielder outperformed Ardito, displaying higher chlorophyll content-SPAD values (13%), plant height (45%), stem diameter (12%), shoot dry weight (42%), and root biomass (75%). Root structure analysis revealed that Fielder had greater total root length (50%), surface area (56%), volume (15%), and diameter (4%) than Ardito under LP. These findings highlight Fielder's superior performance and adaptation to LP stress. Transcriptome analysis of wheat genotype roots identified 3029 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Fielder and 1430 in Ardito, highlighting LP-induced changes. Key DEGs include acid phosphatases (PAPs), phosphate transporters (PHT1 and PHO1), SPX, and transcription factors (MYB, bHLH, and WRKY). KEGG enrichment analysis revealed key pathways like plant hormones signal transduction, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and carbohydrate biosynthesis metabolism. This study unveils crucial genes and the intricate regulatory process in wheat's response to LP stress, offering genetic insights for enhancing plant P utilization efficiency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38745054
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61767-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-61767-z
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comparative Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11050

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31960633
Organisme : Guangxi Natural Science Foundation
ID : 2023GXNSFAA026445

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Chiou, T. & Lin, S. I. Annual Review of Plant Biology. Vol. 62 (eds. Merchant, S. S., Briggs, W. R. & Ort, D.). 185–206 (2011).
Chen, Z. et al. Improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency through modification of root growth responses to phosphate starvation in legumes. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1094157 (2023).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1094157 pubmed: 38510833 pmcid: 10773859
Lizbeth Lopez-Arredondo, D., Antonio Leyva-Gonzalez, M., Isabel Gonzalez-Morales, S., Lopez-Bucio, J. & Herrera-Estrella, L. Annual Review of Plant Biology. Vol. 65 (ed. Merchant, S. S.). 95–123 (2014).
Niu, Y. F. et al. Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: A review. Ann. Bot. 112, 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs285 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs285 pubmed: 23267006
Zhang, Z., Liao, H. & Lucas, W. J. Molecular mechanisms underlying phosphate sensing, signaling, and adaptation in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 56, 192–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12163 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12163 pubmed: 24417933
Gu, M., Chen, A., Sun, S. & Xu, G. Complex regulation of plant phosphate transporters and the gap between molecular mechanisms and practical application: What is missing?. Mol. Plant 9, 396–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.012 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.012 pubmed: 26714050
Mlodzinska, E. & Zboinska, M. Phosphate uptake and allocation—A closer look at Arabidopsis thaliana L. and Oryza sativa L.. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01198 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01198 pubmed: 27574525 pmcid: 4983557
Nilsson, L., Mueller, R. & Nielsen, T. H. Increased expression of the MYB-related transcription factor, PHR1, leads to enhanced phosphate uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 1499–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01734.x (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01734.x pubmed: 17927693
Puga, M. I. et al. SPX1 is a phosphate-dependent inhibitor of PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE 1 in Arabidopsis. PNAS 111, 14947–14952. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404654111 (2014).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404654111 pubmed: 25271326 pmcid: 4205628
Wang, Z. et al. Rice SPX1 and SPX2 inhibit phosphate starvation responses through interacting with PHR2 in a phosphate-dependent manner. PNAS 111, 14953–14958. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404680111 (2014).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404680111 pubmed: 25271318 pmcid: 4205599
Wang, F., Deng, M., Xu, J., Zhu, X. & Mao, C. Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport and signaling in higher plants. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 74, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.013 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.013 pubmed: 28648582
Yang, M. et al. Chloroplastic Sec14-like proteins modulate growth and phosphate deficiency responses in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiad212 (2023).
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad212 pubmed: 37706557 pmcid: 10980416
Walkowiak, S. et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 588, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2961-x (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2961-x pubmed: 33239791 pmcid: 7759465
Chen, W. et al. Research advances in the mutual mechanisms regulating response of plant roots to phosphate deficiency and aluminum toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031137 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/ijms23031137 pubmed: 36614339 pmcid: 9821036
Madsen, C. K. & Brinch-Pedersen, H. Molecular advances on phytases in barley and wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102459 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/ijms20102459 pubmed: 31109025 pmcid: 6566229
Miao, J. et al. Characterization of the promoter of phosphate transporter TaPHT1.2 differentially expressed in wheat varieties. J. Genet. Genomics 36, 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1673-8527(08)60135-6 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/s1673-8527(08)60135-6 pubmed: 19683668
Liu, X. et al. TaPht1;4, a high-affinity phosphate transporter gene in wheat (Triticum aestivum), plays an important role in plant phosphate acquisition under phosphorus deprivation. Funct. Plant Biol. 40, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1071/fp12242 (2013).
doi: 10.1071/fp12242 pubmed: 32481111
Guo, C. et al. TaPT2, a high-affinity phosphate transporter gene in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), is crucial in plant Pi uptake under phosphorus deprivation. Acta Physiol. Plant 36, 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1516-x (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1516-x
Wang, P. et al. TaPHT1;9–4B and its transcriptional regulator TaMYB4-7D contribute to phosphate uptake and plant growth in bread wheat. New Phytol. 231, 1968–1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17534 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/nph.17534 pubmed: 34096624 pmcid: 8489284
Guo, C. et al. Function of wheat phosphate transporter gene TaPHT2;1 in Pi translocation and plant growth regulation under replete and limited Pi supply conditions. Planta 237, 1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1836-2 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1836-2 pubmed: 23314830
Ouyang, X. et al. Knock out of the PHOSPHATE 2 gene TaPHO2-A1 improves phosphorus uptake and grain yield under low phosphorus conditions in common wheat. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29850 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/srep29850 pubmed: 28442756 pmcid: 5172230
Wang, J. et al. A phosphate starvation response regulator Ta-PHR1 is involved in phosphate signalling and increases grain yield in wheat. Ann. Bot. 111, 1139–1153. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct080 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/aob/mct080 pubmed: 23589634 pmcid: 3662521
Qu, B. et al. A wheat CCAAT box-binding transcription factor increases the grain yield of wheat with less fertilizer input. Plant Physiol. 167, 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.246959 (2015).
doi: 10.1104/pp.114.246959 pubmed: 25489021
Zheng, X. et al. The MYB transcription factor TaPHR3-A1 is involved in phosphate signaling and governs yield-related traits in bread wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 5808–5822. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa355 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa355 pubmed: 32725154
Liu, Z. et al. TaMIR1139: A wheat miRNA responsive to Pi-starvation, acts a critical mediator in modulating plant tolerance to Pi deprivation. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 1293–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-018-2313-6 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s00299-018-2313-6 pubmed: 29947952
Li, P. et al. Integrated analysis of metabolome and transcriptome reveals insights for low phosphorus tolerance in wheat seedling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914840 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/ijms241914840 pubmed: 38203709 pmcid: 10779345
Cuyas, L., Jing, L., Pluchon, S. & Arkoun, M. Unraveling metabolic profile of wheat plants subjected to different phosphate regimes. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 23, 974–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-01097-z (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s42729-022-01097-z
Zheng, L. et al. Comparative physiological and proteomic response to phosphate deficiency between two wheat genotypes differing in phosphorus utilization efficiency. J. Proteom. 280, 104894–104894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2023.104894 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2023.104894
Satheesh, V., Tahir, A., Li, J. & Lei, M. Plant phosphate nutrition: Sensing the stress. Stress biol. 2, 16–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-022-00039-0 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s44154-022-00039-0 pubmed: 37676547 pmcid: 10441931
Silva-Navas, A. et al. Role of cis-zeatin in root responses to phosphate starvation. New Phytol. 224, 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16020 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/nph.16020 pubmed: 31230346
Bhosale, R. et al. A mechanistic framework for auxin dependent Arabidopsis root hair elongation to low external phosphate. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03851-3 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03851-3 pubmed: 29720582 pmcid: 5932073
Chien, P., Chiang, C., Leong, S. J. & Chiou, T. Sensing and signaling of phosphate starvation: From local to long distance. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 1714–1722. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy148 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy148 pubmed: 30053262
Fei, Y., Xue, Y., Du, P., Yang, S. & Deng, X. Expression analysis and promoter methylation under osmotic and salinity stress of TaGAPC1 in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Protoplasma 254, 987–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-1008-5 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00709-016-1008-5 pubmed: 27488925
Fita, A. et al. Diversity in expression of phosphorus (P) responsive genes in Cucumis melo L.. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035387 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035387 pubmed: 22536378 pmcid: 3334927
Wang, Y., Chen, Y. & Wu, W. Potassium and phosphorus transport and signaling in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63, 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13053 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13053 pubmed: 33325114
Hu, X. et al. Transcriptome analysis of Zygophyllum xanthoxylum adaptation strategies to phosphate stress. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.723595 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.723595 pubmed: 35211136 pmcid: 8751206
Zhong, Y. et al. Rice SPX6 negatively regulates the phosphate starvation response through suppression of the transcription factor PHR2. New Phytol. 219, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15155 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/nph.15155 pubmed: 29658119
Lv, Q. et al. SPX4 negatively regulates phosphate signaling and homeostasis through its interaction with PHR2 in rice. Plant Cell 26, 1586–1597. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.123208 (2014).
doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.123208 pubmed: 24692424 pmcid: 4036573
Du, Y. & Scheres, B. Lateral root formation and the multiple roles of auxin. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx223 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx223 pubmed: 28992266
Castrillo, G. et al. Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature 543, 513. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21417 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nature21417 pubmed: 28297714 pmcid: 5364063
Devaiah, B. N., Madhuvanthi, R., Karthikeyan, A. S. & Raghothama, K. G. Phosphate starvation responses and gibberellic acid biosynthesis are regulated by the MYB62 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssn081 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/mp/ssn081 pubmed: 19529828
Ham, B., Chen, J., Yan, Y. & Lucas, W. J. Insights into plant phosphate sensing and signaling. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 49, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.005 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.005 pubmed: 28732264
Planas-Riverola, A. et al. Brassinosteroid signaling in plant development and adaptation to stress. Development https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.151894 (2019).
doi: 10.1242/dev.151894 pubmed: 30872266 pmcid: 6432667
Liu, T. et al. Brassinosteroid signaling regulates phosphate starvation-induced malate secretion in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 65, 1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13443 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13443 pubmed: 36579777
Wu, Q. et al. Endophytic Bacillus sp. AP10 harboured in Arabis paniculata mediates plant growth promotion and manganese detoxification. Ecotox. Environ. Safe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115170 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115170
Chen, Y. et al. Enhancement of polyphenolic metabolism as an adaptive response of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) roots to aluminum stress. Environ. Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114230 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114230 pubmed: 33857883 pmcid: 8017598
Tomasi, N. et al. Flavonoids of white lupin roots participate in phosphorus mobilization from soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 1971–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.017 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.017
Iqbal, A. et al. Integrative physiological, transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals the involvement of carbon and flavonoid biosynthesis in low phosphorus tolerance in cotton. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 196, 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.042 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.042 pubmed: 36738510
Luo, J. et al. Metabolic alterations provide insights into Stylosanthes roots responding to phosphorus deficiency. BMC Plant Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-2283-z (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2283-z pubmed: 33256591 pmcid: 7708918
Luo, B. et al. Metabolite profiling and genome-wide association studies reveal response mechanisms of phosphorus deficiency in maize seedling. Plant J. 97, 947–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14160 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14160 pubmed: 30472798 pmcid: 6850195
Nezamivand-Chegini, M. et al. Integration of transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses provides insights into response mechanisms to nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies in soybean. Plant Sci. (Amsterdam, Neth.) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111498 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111498
Zeng, X., Chow, W. S., Su, L., Peng, X. & Peng, C. Protective effect of supplemental anthocyanins on Arabidopsis leaves under high light. Physiol. Plant 138, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01316.x (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01316.x pubmed: 19947975
Hammond, J. P. & White, P. J. Sucrose transport in the phloem: Integrating root responses to phosphorus starvation. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm221 (2008).
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm221 pubmed: 18212031
Iqbal, A. et al. Phosphorus and carbohydrate metabolism contributes to low phosphorus tolerance in cotton. BMC Plant Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04100-6 (2023).
doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04100-6 pubmed: 37978421 pmcid: 10656992
Nguyen, V. L., Palmer, L. & Stangoulis, J. Higher photochemical quenching and better maintenance of carbon dioxide fixation are key traits for phosphorus use efficiency in the wheat breeding line, RAC875. Front Plant Sci 12, 816211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.816211 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.816211 pubmed: 35185965
Kumar, S. et al. Characterization of contrasting rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes reveals the Pi-efficient schema for phosphate starvation tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03015-4 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03015-4 pubmed: 34937558 pmcid: 8693493
Amtmann, A., Hammond, J. P., Armengaud, P. & White, P. J. Advances in Botanical Research: Incorporating Advances in Plant Pathology. Vol. 43 (ed. Callow, J. A.). 209–257 (2006).
Wang, J. et al. Ethylene inhibits malate accumulation in apple by transcriptional repression of aluminum-activated malate transporter 9 via the WRKY31-ERF72 network. New Phytol. 239, 1014–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18795 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/nph.18795 pubmed: 36747049
Wang, Y. et al. Dual effects of transgenic Brassica napus overexpressing CS gene on tolerances to aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency. Plant Soil 362, 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1289-1 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1289-1
Wang, Z. et al. The mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase 1 gene GhmMDH1 is involved in plant and root growth under phosphorus deficiency conditions in cotton. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10343 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/srep10343 pubmed: 26814847 pmcid: 4687042
Begum, H. H. et al. The function of a maize-derived phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) in phosphorus-deficient transgenic rice. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 51, 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2005.tb00058.x (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2005.tb00058.x
Yang, W. T. et al. Overexpression of OsMYB4P, an R2R3-type MYB transcriptional activator, increases phosphate acquisition in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 80, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.02.024 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.02.024 pubmed: 24813725
Dai, X., Wang, Y., Yang, A. & Zhang, W. OsMYB2P, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, is involved in the regulation of phosphate-starvation responses and root architecture in rice. Plant Physiol. 159, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.194217 (2012).
doi: 10.1104/pp.112.194217 pubmed: 22395576 pmcid: 3375959
Baek, D. et al. Regulation of miR399f transcription by AtMYB2 affects phosphate starvation responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 161, 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.205922 (2013).
doi: 10.1104/pp.112.205922 pubmed: 23154535
Yi, K. K. et al. OsPTF1, a novel transcription factor involved in tolerance to phosphate starvation in rice. Plant Physiol. 138, 2087–2096. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.063115 (2005).
doi: 10.1104/pp.105.063115 pubmed: 16006597 pmcid: 1183397
Wang, H. et al. Arabidopsis WRKY45 transcription factor activates PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER 1; 1 expression in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol. 164, 2020–2029. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.235077 (2014).
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.235077 pubmed: 24586044 pmcid: 3982759
Devaiah, B. N., Karthikeyan, A. S. & Raghothama, K. G. WRKY75 transcription factor is a modulator of phosphate acquisition and root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 143, 1789–1801. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.093971 (2007).
doi: 10.1104/pp.106.093971 pubmed: 17322336 pmcid: 1851818
Dai, X., Wang, Y. & Zhang, W. OsWRKY74, a WRKY transcription factor, modulates tolerance to phosphate starvation in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 947–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv515 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv515 pubmed: 26663563
Zhang, J. et al. OsWRKY21 and OsWRKY108 function redundantly to promote phosphate accumulation through maintaining the constitutive expression of OsPHT1;1 under phosphate-replete conditions. New Phytol. 229, 1598–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16931 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/nph.16931 pubmed: 32936937
Dai, B. et al. Physiological, biochemical, and transcriptomic responses of Neolamarckia cadamba to aluminum stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249624 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/ijms21249624 pubmed: 33396637 pmcid: 7795855
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, 884–890. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357-U121. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3317 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317 pubmed: 25751142 pmcid: 4655817
Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3122 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3122 pubmed: 25690850 pmcid: 4643835
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 (2011).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 pubmed: 25516281 pmcid: 4302049
Chen, C. et al. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13, 1194–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 pubmed: 32585190
Xie, C. et al. KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W316–W322. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr483 (2011).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr483 pubmed: 21715386 pmcid: 3125809
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using realtime quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262 (2001).
doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 pubmed: 11846609
Luo, D. et al. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal commonalities and specificities in wheat in response to aluminum and manganese. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 46, 367–397. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46010024 (2024).
doi: 10.3390/cimb46010024 pubmed: 38248326 pmcid: 10814679

Auteurs

Daozhen Luo (D)

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.

Muhammad Usman (M)

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.

Fei Pang (F)

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.

Wenjie Zhang (W)

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.

Ying Qin (Y)

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.

Qing Li (Q)

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.

Yangrui Li (Y)

Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 530007, China.

Yongxiu Xing (Y)

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China. xyx@gxu.edu.cn.

Dengfeng Dong (D)

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China. dongdfxy@gxu.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger

Classifications MeSH