Circadian and photoperiodic regulation of the vegetative to reproductive transition in plants.
Journal
Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
Titre abrégé: Commun Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719179
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 May 2024
16 May 2024
Historique:
received:
29
10
2023
accepted:
01
05
2024
medline:
17
5
2024
pubmed:
17
5
2024
entrez:
16
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As sessile organisms, plants must respond constantly to ever-changing environments to complete their life cycle; this includes the transition from vegetative growth to reproductive development. This process is mediated by photoperiodic response to sensing the length of night or day through circadian regulation of light-signaling molecules, such as phytochromes, to measure the length of night to initiate flowering. Flowering time is the most important trait to optimize crop performance in adaptive regions. In this review, we focus on interplays between circadian and light signaling pathways that allow plants to optimize timing for flowering and seed production in Arabidopsis, rice, soybean, and cotton. Many crops are polyploids and domesticated under natural selection and breeding. In response to adaptation and polyploidization, circadian and flowering pathway genes are epigenetically reprogrammed. Understanding the genetic and epigenetic bases for photoperiodic flowering will help improve crop yield and resilience in response to climate change.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38755402
doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06275-6
pii: 10.1038/s42003-024-06275-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
579Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
ID : GM109076
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : IOS1739092
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 32200264
Organisme : Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province
ID : tsqn202211101
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Xu, X. et al. Circadian clock in plants: linking timing to fitness. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 64, 792–811 (2022).
pubmed: 35088570
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13230
Imaizumi, T. Arabidopsis circadian clock and photoperiodism: time to think about location. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 83–89 (2010).
pubmed: 19836294
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.09.007
Searle, I. & Coupland, G. Induction of flowering by seasonal changes in photoperiod. EMBO J. 23, 1217–1222 (2004).
pubmed: 15014450
pmcid: 381405
doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600117
Hayama, R. & Coupland, G. Shedding light on the circadian clock and the photoperiodic control of flowering. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 13–19 (2003).
pubmed: 12495746
doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00011-0
Srikanth, A. & Schmid, M. Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 68, 2013–2037 (2011).
pubmed: 21611891
doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0673-y
Kobayashi, Y. & Weigel, D. Move on up, it’s time for change-mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. Genes Dev. 21, 2371–2384 (2007).
pubmed: 17908925
doi: 10.1101/gad.1589007
Hendricks, S. B. Rates of change of phytochrome as an essential factor determining photoperiodism in plants. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 25, 245–248 (1960).
pubmed: 13713294
doi: 10.1101/SQB.1960.025.01.025
Song, Y. H., Shim, J. S., Kinmonth-Schultz, H. A. & Imaizumi, T. Photoperiodic flowering: time measurement mechanisms in leaves. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 441–464 (2015).
pubmed: 25534513
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-115555
Thomas, B. & Vince-Prue, D. Photoperiodism in Plants, (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1997).
Pittendrigh, C.S. The circadian oscillation in Drosophila pseudoobscura pupae: a model for the photoperiodic clock. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 54, 275–307 (1966).
Bünning, E. Die endonome Tagesrhythmik als Grundlage der photoperiodischen Reaktion. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 54, 590–607 (1936).
Edgar, R. S. et al. Peroxiredoxins are conserved markers of circadian rhythms. Nature 485, 459–464 (2012).
pubmed: 22622569
pmcid: 3398137
doi: 10.1038/nature11088
Yanovsky, M. J. & Kay, S. A. Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis. Nature 419, 308–312 (2002).
pubmed: 12239570
doi: 10.1038/nature00996
Valverde, F. et al. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science 303, 1003–1006 (2004).
pubmed: 14963328
doi: 10.1126/science.1091761
Gil, K. E. & Park, C. M. Thermal adaptation and plasticity of the plant circadian clock. N. Phytol. 221, 1215–1229 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/nph.15518
Kakutani, T. Genetic characterization of late-flowering traits induced by DNA hypomethylation mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 12, 1447–1451 (1997).
pubmed: 9450349
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12061447.x
Soppe, W. J. et al. The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. Mol. Cell 6, 791–802 (2000).
pubmed: 11090618
doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00090-0
Finnegan, J. E. et al. The downregulation of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) expression in plants with low levels of DNA methylation and by vernalization occurs by distinct mechanisms. Plant J. 44, 420–432 (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02541.x
Bastow, R. et al. Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature 427, 164–167 (2004).
pubmed: 14712277
doi: 10.1038/nature02269
Crevillen, P. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming that prevents transgenerational inheritance of the vernalized state. Nature 515, 587–590 (2014).
pubmed: 25219852
pmcid: 4247276
doi: 10.1038/nature13722
Sung, S. & Amasino, R. M. Vernalization and epigenetics: how plants remember winter. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 4–10 (2004).
pubmed: 14732435
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2003.11.010
Song, Q., Zhang, T., Stelly, D. M. & Chen, Z. J. Epigenomic and functional analyses reveal roles of epialleles in the loss of photoperiod sensitivity during domestication of allotetraploid cottons. Genome Biol. 18, 99 (2017).
pubmed: 28558752
pmcid: 5450403
doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1229-8
Chen, Z. J. & Mas, P. Interactive roles of chromatin regulation and circadian clock function in plants. Genome Biol. 20, 62 (2019).
pubmed: 30902105
pmcid: 6429827
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1672-9
Chen, Z. J. Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nat. Rev. Genet 14, 471–482 (2013).
pubmed: 23752794
doi: 10.1038/nrg3503
Chen, Z. J. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58, 377–406 (2007).
pubmed: 17280525
pmcid: 1949485
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103835
Chen, Z. J. Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 57–71 (2010).
pubmed: 20080432
pmcid: 2821985
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.003
Chen, Z. J. & Birchler, J. A. Polyploid and Hybrid Genomics, 363 (Wiley-Blackwell, New York, 2013).
Wang, Z. Y. & Tobin, E. M. Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell 93, 1207–1217 (1998).
pubmed: 9657153
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81464-6
Mizoguchi, T. et al. LHY and CCA1 are partially redundant genes required to maintain circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 2, 629–641 (2002).
pubmed: 12015970
doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00170-3
Huang, W. et al. Mapping the core of the Arabidopsis circadian clock defines the network structure of the oscillator. Science 336, 75–79 (2012).
pubmed: 22403178
doi: 10.1126/science.1219075
Pruneda-Paz, J. L., Breton, G., Para, A. & Kay, S. A. A functional genomics approach reveals CHE as a component of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 323, 1481–1485 (2009).
pubmed: 19286557
pmcid: 4259050
doi: 10.1126/science.1167206
Nakamichi, N. et al. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS 9, 7, and 5 are transcriptional repressors in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 22, 594–605 (2010).
pubmed: 20233950
pmcid: 2861452
doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072892
Nusinow, D. A. et al. The ELF4-ELF3-LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth. Nature 475, 398–402 (2011).
pubmed: 21753751
pmcid: 3155984
doi: 10.1038/nature10182
Kamioka, M. et al. Direct repression of evening genes by CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 28, 696–711 (2016).
pubmed: 26941090
pmcid: 4826007
doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00737
Lu, S. X. et al. CCA1 and ELF3 Interact in the control of hypocotyl length and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 158, 1079–1088 (2012).
pubmed: 22190341
doi: 10.1104/pp.111.189670
Farre, E. M., Harmer, S. L., Harmon, F. G., Yanovsky, M. J. & Kay, S. A. Overlapping and distinct roles of PRR7 and PRR9 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Curr. Biol. 15, 47–54 (2005).
pubmed: 15649364
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.067
Herrero, E. & Davis, S. J. Time for a nuclear meeting: protein trafficking and chromatin dynamics intersect in the plant circadian system. Mol. Plant 5, 554–565 (2012).
pubmed: 22379122
doi: 10.1093/mp/sss010
Martin-Tryon, E. L., Kreps, J. A. & Harmer, S. L. GIGANTEA acts in blue light signaling and has biochemically separable roles in circadian clock and flowering time regulation. Plant Physiol. 143, 473–486 (2007).
pubmed: 17098855
pmcid: 1761957
doi: 10.1104/pp.106.088757
Mizoguchi, T. et al. Distinct roles of GIGANTEA in promoting flowering and regulating circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 2255–2270 (2005).
pubmed: 16006578
pmcid: 1182487
doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.033464
Mas, P., Alabadi, D., Yanovsky, M. J., Oyama, T. & Kay, S. A. Dual role of TOC1 in the control of circadian and photomorphogenic responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15, 223–236 (2003).
pubmed: 12509533
pmcid: 143493
doi: 10.1105/tpc.006734
Kiba, T., Henriques, R., Sakakibara, H. & Chua, N. H. Targeted degradation of PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR5 by an SCFZTL complex regulates clock function and photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 19, 2516–2530 (2007).
pubmed: 17693530
pmcid: 2002626
doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.053033
Wu, J. F., Wang, Y. & Wu, S. H. Two new clock proteins, LWD1 and LWD2, regulate Arabidopsis photoperiodic flowering. Plant Physiol. 148, 948–959 (2008).
pubmed: 18676661
pmcid: 2556813
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.124917
Nohales, M. A. & Kay, S. A. Molecular mechanisms at the core of the plant circadian oscillator. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 1061–1069 (2016).
pubmed: 27922614
pmcid: 7750160
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3327
Wu, J. F. et al. LWD-TCP complex activates the morning gene CCA1 in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 7, 13181 (2016).
pubmed: 27734958
pmcid: 5065627
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13181
Rawat, R. et al. REVEILLE8 and PSEUDO-REPONSE REGULATOR5 form a negative feedback loop within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001350 (2011).
pubmed: 21483796
pmcid: 3069099
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001350
Farinas, B. & Mas, P. Functional implication of the MYB transcription factor RVE8/LCL5 in the circadian control of histone acetylation. Plant J. 66, 318–329 (2011).
pubmed: 21205033
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04484.x
Xie, Q. et al. LNK1 and LNK2 are transcriptional coactivators in the Arabidopsis circadian oscillator. Plant Cell 26, 2843–2857 (2014).
pubmed: 25012192
pmcid: 4145118
doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.126573
Suarez-Lopez, P. et al. CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature 410, 1116–1120 (2001).
pubmed: 11323677
doi: 10.1038/35074138
Imaizumi, T., Schultz, T. F., Harmon, F. G., Ho, L. A. & Kay, S. A. FKF1 F-box protein mediates cyclic degradation of a repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science 309, 293–297 (2005).
pubmed: 16002617
doi: 10.1126/science.1110586
Sawa, M., Nusinow, D. A., Kay, S. A. & Imaizumi, T. salaFKF1 and GIGANTEA Complex Formation is Required for Day-Length Measurement in Arabidopsis. Science 318, 261–265 (2007).
pubmed: 17872410
pmcid: 3709017
doi: 10.1126/science.1146994
Andres, F. & Coupland, G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 627–639 (2012).
pubmed: 22898651
doi: 10.1038/nrg3291
Rosas, U. et al. Variation in Arabidopsis flowering time associated with cis-regulatory variation in CONSTANS. Nat. Commun. 5, 3651 (2014).
pubmed: 24736505
doi: 10.1038/ncomms4651
Nakamichi, N. et al. Arabidopsis clock-associated pseudo-response regulators PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5 coordinately and positively regulate flowering time through the canonical CONSTANS-dependent photoperiodic pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 48, 822–832 (2007).
pubmed: 17504813
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm056
Seaton, D. D. et al. Linked circadian outputs control elongation growth and flowering in response to photoperiod and temperature. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 776 (2015).
pubmed: 25600997
pmcid: 4332151
doi: 10.15252/msb.20145766
Nakamichi, N. et al. Transcriptional repressor PRR5 directly regulates clock-output pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17123–17128 (2012).
pubmed: 23027938
pmcid: 3479524
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205156109
Niwa, R. & Slack, F. J. The evolution of animal microRNA function. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17, 145–150 (2007).
pubmed: 17317150
doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2007.02.004
Kwon, E. et al. Structural analysis of the regulation of blue-light receptors by GIGANTEA. Cell Rep. 39, 110700 (2022).
pubmed: 35443175
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110700
Salazar, J. D. et al. Prediction of photoperiodic regulators from quantitative gene circuit models. Cell 139, 1170–1179 (2009).
pubmed: 20005809
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.029
Fornara, F. et al. Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. Dev. Cell 17, 75–86 (2009).
pubmed: 19619493
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.015
Somers, D. E., Kim, W. Y. & Geng, R. The F-box protein ZEITLUPE confers dosage-dependent control on the circadian clock, photomorphogenesis, and flowering time. Plant Cell 16, 769–782 (2004).
pubmed: 14973171
pmcid: 385287
doi: 10.1105/tpc.016808
Takase, T. et al. LOV KELCH PROTEIN2 and ZEITLUPE repress Arabidopsis photoperiodic flowering under non-inductive conditions, dependent on FLAVIN-BINDING KELCH REPEAT F-BOX1. Plant J. 67, 608–621 (2011).
pubmed: 21518052
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04618.x
Lazaro, A., Valverde, F., Pineiro, M. & Jarillo, J. A. The Arabidopsis E3 ubiquitin ligase HOS1 negatively regulates CONSTANS abundance in the photoperiodic control of flowering. Plant Cell 24, 982–999 (2012).
pubmed: 22408073
pmcid: 3336113
doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.081885
Chamovitz, D. A. et al. The COP9 complex, a novel multisubunit nuclear regulator involved in light control of a plant developmental switch. Cell 86, 115–121 (1996).
pubmed: 8689678
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80082-3
Jang, S. et al. Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response. EMBO J. 27, 1277–1288 (2008).
pubmed: 18388858
pmcid: 2291449
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.68
Seo, H. S. et al. LAF1 ubiquitination by COP1 controls photomorphogenesis and is stimulated by SPA1. Nature 423, 995–999 (2003).
pubmed: 12827204
doi: 10.1038/nature01696
Serrano-Bueno, G. et al. CONSTANS-FKBP12 interaction contributes to modulation of photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 101, 1287–1302 (2020).
pubmed: 31661582
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14590
Lian, H. L. et al. Blue-light-dependent interaction of cryptochrome 1 with SPA1 defines a dynamic signaling mechanism. Genes Dev. 25, 1023–1028 (2011).
pubmed: 21511872
pmcid: 3093117
doi: 10.1101/gad.2025111
Cerdan, P. D. & Chory, J. Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature 423, 881–885 (2003).
pubmed: 12815435
doi: 10.1038/nature01636
Turck, F., Fornara, F. & Coupland, G. Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 573–594 (2008).
pubmed: 18444908
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092755
Wang, F. et al. The rice circadian clock regulates tiller growth and panicle development through strigolactone signaling and sugar sensing. Plant Cell 32, 3124–3138 (2020).
pubmed: 32796126
pmcid: 7534462
doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00289
Murakami, M., Ashikari, M., Miura, K., Yamashino, T. & Mizuno, T. The evolutionarily conserved OsPRR quintet: rice pseudo-response regulators implicated in circadian rhythm. Plant Cell Physiol. 44, 1229–1236 (2003).
pubmed: 14634161
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcg135
Ko, D. K. et al. Temporal shift of circadian-mediated gene expression and carbon fixation contributes to biomass heterosis in maize hybrids. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006197 (2016).
pubmed: 27467757
pmcid: 4965137
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006197
Miwa, K., Serikawa, M., Suzuki, S., Kondo, T. & Oyama, T. Conserved expression profiles of circadian clock-related genes in two lemna species showing long-day and short-day photoperiodic flowering responses. Plant Cell Physiol. 47, 601–612 (2006).
pubmed: 16524874
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcj027
Tsuji, H., Taoka, K. I. & Shimamoto, K. Regulation of flowering in rice: two florigen genes, a complex gene network, and natural variation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 45–52 (2010).
pubmed: 20864385
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.08.016
Tamaki, S., Matsuo, S., Wong, H. L., Yokoi, S. & Shimamoto, K. Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science 316, 1033–1036 (2007).
pubmed: 17446351
doi: 10.1126/science.1141753
Komiya, R., Ikegami, A., Tamaki, S., Yokoi, S. & Shimamoto, K. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice. Development 135, 767–774 (2008).
pubmed: 18223202
doi: 10.1242/dev.008631
Yano, M. et al. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12, 2473–2484 (2000).
pubmed: 11148291
pmcid: 102231
doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2473
Doi, K. et al. Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev. 18, 926–936 (2004).
pubmed: 15078816
pmcid: 395851
doi: 10.1101/gad.1189604
Hayama, R., Yokoi, S., Tamaki, S., Yano, M. & Shimamoto, K. Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice. Nature 422, 719–722 (2003).
pubmed: 12700762
doi: 10.1038/nature01549
Izawa, T. et al. Os-GIGANTEA confers robust diurnal rhythms on the global transcriptome of rice in the field. Plant Cell 23, 1741–1755 (2011).
pubmed: 21571948
pmcid: 3123946
doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.083238
Takano, M. et al. Distinct and cooperative functions of phytochromes A, B, and C in the control of deetiolation and flowering in rice. Plant Cell 17, 3311–3325 (2005).
pubmed: 16278346
pmcid: 1315371
doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035899
Ishikawa, R. et al. Phytochrome B regulates Heading date 1 (Hd1)-mediated expression of rice florigen Hd3a and critical day length in rice. Mol. Genet. Genomics 285, 461–470 (2011).
pubmed: 21512732
doi: 10.1007/s00438-011-0621-4
Xue, W. et al. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat. Genet. 40, 761–767 (2008).
pubmed: 18454147
doi: 10.1038/ng.143
Itoh, H., Nonoue, Y., Yano, M. & Izawa, T. A pair of floral regulators sets critical day length for Hd3a florigen expression in rice. Nat. Genet. 42, 635–638 (2010).
pubmed: 20543848
doi: 10.1038/ng.606
Osugi, A., Itoh, H., Ikeda-Kawakatsu, K., Takano, M. & Izawa, T. Molecular dissection of the roles of phytochrome in photoperiodic flowering in rice. Plant Physiol. 157, 1128–1137 (2011).
pubmed: 21880933
pmcid: 3252176
doi: 10.1104/pp.111.181792
Du, A. et al. The DTH8-Hd1 module mediates day-length-dependent regulation of rice flowering. Mol. Plant 10, 948–961 (2017).
pubmed: 28549969
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.05.006
Wei, X. et al. DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiol. 153, 1747–1758 (2010).
pubmed: 20566706
pmcid: 2923886
doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156943
Zhu, S. et al. The OsHAPL1-DTH8-Hd1 complex functions as the transcription regulator to repress heading date in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 553–568 (2017).
pubmed: 28043949
pmcid: 6055584
Nemoto, Y., Nonoue, Y., Yano, M. & Izawa, T. Hd1,a CONSTANS ortholog in rice, functions as an Ehd1 repressor through interaction with monocot-specific CCT-domain protein Ghd7. Plant J. 86, 221–233 (2016).
pubmed: 26991872
doi: 10.1111/tpj.13168
Murphy, R. L. et al. Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16469–16474 (2011).
pubmed: 21930910
pmcid: 3182727
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106212108
Gao, H. et al. Days to heading 7, a major quantitative locus determining photoperiod sensitivity and regional adaptation in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16337–16342 (2014).
pubmed: 25378698
pmcid: 4246261
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418204111
Goretti, D. et al. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms limit heading date 1 (Hd1) function to adapt rice to high latitudes. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006530 (2017).
pubmed: 28068345
pmcid: 5221825
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006530
Fujino, K., Yamanouchi, U., Nonoue, Y., Obara, M. & Yano, M. Switching genetic effects of the flowering time gene Hd1 in LD conditions by Ghd7 and OsPRR37 in rice. Breed. Sci. 69, 127–132 (2019).
pubmed: 31086490
pmcid: 6507719
doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.18060
Wang, X. L., He, Y. Q., Wei, H. & Wang, L. A clock regulatory module is required for salt tolerance and control of heading date in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 3283–3301 (2021).
pubmed: 34402093
doi: 10.1111/pce.14167
Andrade, L. et al. The evening complex integrates photoperiod signals to control flowering in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2122582119 (2022).
pubmed: 35733265
pmcid: 9245669
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122582119
Schmutz, J. et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463, 178–183 (2010).
pubmed: 20075913
doi: 10.1038/nature08670
Kong, F. et al. Two coordinately regulated homologs of FLOWERING LOCUS T are involved in the control of photoperiodic flowering in soybean. Plant Physiol. 154, 1220–1231 (2010).
pubmed: 20864544
pmcid: 2971601
doi: 10.1104/pp.110.160796
Zhai, H. et al. GmFT4, a homolog of FLOWERING LOCUS T, is positively regulated by E1 and functions as a flowering repressor in soybean. PLoS One 9, e89030 (2014).
pubmed: 24586488
pmcid: 3929636
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089030
Liu, W. et al. Functional diversification of Flowering Locus T homologs in soybean: GmFT1a and GmFT2a/5a have opposite roles in controlling flowering and maturation. New Phytol. 217, 1335–1345 (2018).
pubmed: 29120038
doi: 10.1111/nph.14884
Wu, F., Sedivy, E. J., Price, W. B., Haider, W. & Hanzawa, Y. Evolutionary trajectories of duplicated FT homologues and their roles in soybean domestication. Plant J. 90, 941–953 (2017).
pubmed: 28244155
doi: 10.1111/tpj.13521
Watanabe, S. et al. A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics 188, 395–407 (2011).
pubmed: 21406680
pmcid: 3122305
doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.125062
Yang, S., Weers, B. D., Morishige, D. T. & Mullet, J. E. CONSTANS is a photoperiod regulated activator of flowering in sorghum. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 148 (2014).
pubmed: 24884377
pmcid: 4046011
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-148
Cao, D. et al. GmCOL1a and GmCOL1b function as flowering repressors in soybean under long-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 2409–2422 (2015).
pubmed: 26508522
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv152
Awal Khan, M. A. et al. CONSTANS polymorphism modulates flowering time and maturity in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 817544 (2022).
pubmed: 35371153
pmcid: 8969907
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.817544
Lu, S. et al. Stepwise selection on homeologous PRR genes controlling flowering and maturity during soybean domestication. Nat. Genet 52, 428–436 (2020).
pubmed: 32231277
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0604-7
Li, C. et al. A domestication-associated gene GmPRR3b regulates the circadian clock and flowering time in soybean. Mol. Plant 13, 745–759 (2020).
pubmed: 32017998
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.01.014
Li, F. et al. Identification and molecular characterization of FKF1 and GI homologous genes in soybean. PLoS One 8, e79036 (2013).
pubmed: 24236086
pmcid: 3827303
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079036
Fang, X. et al. Modulation of evening complex activity enables north-to-south adaptation of soybean. Sci. China Life Sci. 64, 179–195 (2021).
pubmed: 33230598
doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1832-2
Liu, B. et al. Genetic redundancy in soybean photoresponses associated with duplication of the phytochrome A gene. Genetics 180, 995–1007 (2008).
pubmed: 18780733
pmcid: 2567397
doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.092742
Watanabe, S. et al. Map-based cloning of the gene associated with the soybean maturity locus E3. Genetics 182, 1251–1262 (2009).
pubmed: 19474204
pmcid: 2728863
doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.098772
Zhang, Q. et al. Association of the circadian rhythmic expression of GmCRY1a with a latitudinal cline in photoperiodic flowering of soybean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 21028–21033 (2008).
pubmed: 19106300
pmcid: 2607247
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810585105
Whittaker, C. & Dean, C. The FLC locus: a platform for discoveries in epigenetics and adaptation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 555–575 (2017).
pubmed: 28693387
doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060546
Swiezewski, S., Liu, F., Magusin, A. & Dean, C. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462, 799–802 (2009).
pubmed: 20010688
doi: 10.1038/nature08618
Heo, J. B. & Sung, S. Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science 331, 76–79 (2011).
pubmed: 21127216
doi: 10.1126/science.1197349
Jeon, M. et al. Vernalization-triggered expression of the antisense transcript COOLAIR is mediated by CBF genes. Elife 12, e84594 (2023).
pubmed: 36722843
pmcid: 10036118
doi: 10.7554/eLife.84594
Ikeda, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Yamaguchi, A., Abe, M. & Araki, T. Molecular basis of late-flowering phenotype caused by dominant epi-alleles of the FWA locus in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 48, 205–220 (2007).
pubmed: 17189287
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcl061
Ferguson-Smith, A. C. Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 565–575 (2011).
pubmed: 21765458
doi: 10.1038/nrg3032
Reik, W., Collick, A., Norris, M. L., Barton, S. C. & Surani, M. A. Genomic imprinting determines methylation of parental alleles in transgenic mice. Nature 328, 248–251 (1987).
pubmed: 3600805
doi: 10.1038/328248a0
Miller, M., Song, Q., Shi, X., Juenger, T. E. & Chen, Z. J. Natural variation in timing of stress-responsive gene expression predicts heterosis in intraspecific hybrids of Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 6, 7453 (2015).
pubmed: 26154604
doi: 10.1038/ncomms8453
Ng, D. W. et al. A role for CHH methylation in the parent-of-origin effect on altered circadian rhythms and biomass heterosis in Arabidopsis intraspecific hybrids. Plant Cell 26, 2430–2440 (2014).
pubmed: 24894042
pmcid: 4114943
doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.115980
Ni, Z. et al. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature 457, 327–331 (2009).
pubmed: 19029881
doi: 10.1038/nature07523
Fowler, S. G., Cook, D. & Thomashow, M. F. Low temperature induction of Arabidopsis CBF1, 2, and 3 is gated by the circadian clock. Plant Physiol. 137, 961–968 (2005).
pubmed: 15728337
pmcid: 1065397
doi: 10.1104/pp.104.058354
Song, Q. et al. Diurnal down-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis mediates biomass heterosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5606–5611 (2018).
pubmed: 29735680
pmcid: 6003462
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722068115
Song, Q. et al. Diurnal regulation of SDG2 and JMJ14 by circadian clock oscillators orchestrates histone modification rhythms in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 20, 170 (2019).
pubmed: 31429787
pmcid: 6892391
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1777-1
Jiao, Y. et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473, 97–100 (2011).
pubmed: 21478875
doi: 10.1038/nature09916
Soltis, D. E., Visger, C. J. & Soltis, P. S. The polyploidy revolution then…and now: Stebbins revisited. Am. J. Bot. 101, 1057–1078 (2014).
pubmed: 25049267
doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400178
Mayfield, D., Chen, Z. J. & Pires, J. C. Epigenetic regulation of flowering time in polyploids. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 174–178 (2011).
pubmed: 21470900
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.008
Wang, J., Tian, L., Lee, H. S. & Chen, Z. J. Nonadditive regulation of FRI and FLC loci mediates flowering-time variation in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Genetics 173, 965–974 (2006).
pubmed: 16547097
pmcid: 1526503
doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.056580
He, Y. & Amasino, R. M. Role of chromatin modification in flowering-time control. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 30–35 (2005).
pubmed: 15642521
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.11.003
Simpson, G. G. & Dean, C. Arabidopsis, the Rosetta stone of flowering time? Science 296, 285–289 (2002).
pubmed: 11951029
doi: 10.1126/science.296.5566.285
Johanson, U. et al. Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time. Science 290, 344–347 (2000).
pubmed: 11030654
doi: 10.1126/science.290.5490.344
Comai, L. et al. Phenotypic instability and rapid gene silencing in newly formed Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Plant Cell 12, 1551–1568 (2000).
pubmed: 11006331
pmcid: 149069
doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1551
Wang, J. et al. Genomewide nonadditive gene regulation in Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Genetics 172, 507–517 (2006).
pubmed: 16172500
pmcid: 1456178
doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.047894
Wendel, J. F. & Grover, C. E. Taxonomy and Evolution of the Cotton Genus, Gossypium. in Cotton 2nd Edition, Vol. 57 (eds Fang, D. D. & Percy, R. G.) 25–44 (Madison, WI, 2015).
Splitstoser, J. C., Dillehay, T. D., Wouters, J. & Claro, A. Early pre-Hispanic use of indigo blue in Peru. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501623 (2016).
pubmed: 27652337
pmcid: 5023320
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501623
Grover, C. E. et al. Re-evaluating the phylogeny of allopolyploid Gossypium L. Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 92, 45–52 (2015).
pubmed: 26049043
doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.05.023
Li, Z. & Chen, Z. J. Nonadditive gene expression and epigenetic changes in polyploid plants and crops. Adv. Agron. 176, 179–208 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2022.07.005
Percival, A. E., Wendel, J. F. & Stewart, J. M. Taxonomy and germplasm resources. in Cotton: Origin, History, Technology, and Production (eds Smith, C. W. & Cothren, J. T.) 33–63 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1999).
Olsen, K. M. & Wendel, J. F. A bountiful harvest: genomic insights into crop domestication phenotypes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 47–70 (2013).
pubmed: 23451788
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120048
Chen, Z. J. et al. Toward sequencing cotton (Gossypium) genomes. Plant Physiol. 145, 1303–1310 (2007).
pubmed: 18056866
pmcid: 2151711
doi: 10.1104/pp.107.107672
Putterill, J., Robson, F., Lee, K., Simon, R. & Coupland, G. The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell 80, 847–857 (1995).
pubmed: 7697715
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90288-0
Zhang, R. et al. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic analysis of eight COL superfamily genes in group I related to photoperiodic regulation of flowering time in wild and domesticated cotton (Gossypium) species. PLoS One 10, e0118669 (2015).
pubmed: 25710777
pmcid: 4339614
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118669
Haaf, T., Werner, P. & Schmid, M. 5-Azadeoxycytidine distinguishes between active and inactive X chromosome condensation. Cytogenetics Cell Genet. 63, 160–168 (1993).
doi: 10.1159/000133526
Gao, X. et al. Silencing GhNDR1 and GhMKK2 compromises cotton resistance to Verticillium wilt. Plant J. 66, 293–305 (2011).
pubmed: 21219508
pmcid: 3078967
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04491.x
Yang, Q. et al. CACTA-like transposable element in ZmCCT attenuated photoperiod sensitivity and accelerated the postdomestication spread of maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16969–16974 (2013).
pubmed: 24089449
pmcid: 3801022
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310949110
Huang, C. et al. ZmCCT9 enhances maize adaptation to higher latitudes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E334–E341 (2018).
pubmed: 29279404
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718058115
Marrocco, K. et al. Functional analysis of EID1, an F-box protein involved in phytochrome A-dependent light signal transduction. Plant J. 45, 423–438 (2006).
pubmed: 16412087
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02635.x
Muller, N. A. et al. Domestication selected for deceleration of the circadian clock in cultivated tomato. Nat. Genet. 48, 89–93 (2016).
pubmed: 26569124
doi: 10.1038/ng.3447
Krieger, U., Lippman, Z. B. & Zamir, D. The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat. Genet. 42, 459–463 (2010).
pubmed: 20348958
doi: 10.1038/ng.550
Li, Z. et al. Temporal regulation of the metabolome and proteome in photosynthetic and photorespiratory pathways contributes to maize heterosis. Plant Cell 32, 3706–3722 (2020).
pubmed: 33004616
pmcid: 7721322
doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00320