Norwegian general practitioners' perceptions of their depression care - a national survey.
Depression
General practitioners
Primary health care
Talking therapy
Journal
BMC primary care
ISSN: 2731-4553
Titre abrégé: BMC Prim Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300889006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 May 2024
24 May 2024
Historique:
received:
06
12
2023
accepted:
16
05
2024
medline:
25
5
2024
pubmed:
25
5
2024
entrez:
24
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The General Practitioner (GP) is often the first professional contact for patients with depression. Depression care constitutes a substantial part of GPs' workload. To assess how GPs experience their patients' expectations and their own provision of depression care; further, how their depression care was associated with doctor- and practice-characteristics. A cross-sectional questionnaire study about depression care in general practice among the GPs in the Norwegian Physician Survey of 2021. Of the 221 responding GPs, 50% were female and 70% agreed to have constant time pressure due to workload. The GPs believed that patients with depression were interested in their professional assessment (87.2%) and saw them as providers of talking therapy (76,9%). Still, 77,8% of the GPs thought the patients expected a referral. Talking therapy was commonly provided (79.6%) along with consultations of more than 30 min (80.4%). The youngest age group and GPs with shorter patient lists spent more time. Most GPs (92.3%) considered their help to be of great benefit for depressed patients. However, one-fourth of the GPs did not feel competent in providing talking therapy, less frequently reported by the GPs aged 40-54 years. Talking therapy is commonly provided by GPs. However, there is a need to investigate what GP talking therapy implies, and to strengthen GP skills in this regard. Overall, the GPs experience their depression care to be useful for their patients, and do not de-prioritize this although they experience workload pressure.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The General Practitioner (GP) is often the first professional contact for patients with depression. Depression care constitutes a substantial part of GPs' workload.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To assess how GPs experience their patients' expectations and their own provision of depression care; further, how their depression care was associated with doctor- and practice-characteristics.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional questionnaire study about depression care in general practice among the GPs in the Norwegian Physician Survey of 2021.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 221 responding GPs, 50% were female and 70% agreed to have constant time pressure due to workload. The GPs believed that patients with depression were interested in their professional assessment (87.2%) and saw them as providers of talking therapy (76,9%). Still, 77,8% of the GPs thought the patients expected a referral. Talking therapy was commonly provided (79.6%) along with consultations of more than 30 min (80.4%). The youngest age group and GPs with shorter patient lists spent more time. Most GPs (92.3%) considered their help to be of great benefit for depressed patients. However, one-fourth of the GPs did not feel competent in providing talking therapy, less frequently reported by the GPs aged 40-54 years.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Talking therapy is commonly provided by GPs. However, there is a need to investigate what GP talking therapy implies, and to strengthen GP skills in this regard. Overall, the GPs experience their depression care to be useful for their patients, and do not de-prioritize this although they experience workload pressure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38789976
doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02434-0
pii: 10.1186/s12875-024-02434-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
184Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
GBD MDC. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):137–50.
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3
World Health Organization. Integrating mental health into primary care: a global perspective. World Health Organization; 2008.
Norwegian Directorate of Health. National guidelines for diagnostics and treatment of adults with depression. Norway: Oslo; 2009.
Van Gelderen M, Grundmeijer H, Licht-Strunk E, Van Marwijk H, Van Rijswijk H. NHG-standaard Depressie (tweede herziening). Huisarts en Wetenschap. 2012;55:252–9.
NHS. Talking therapies and counselling https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/talking-therapies-medicine-treatments/talking-therapies-and-counselling/ . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.
Pahlavanyali S, Hetlevik Ø, Blinkenberg J, Hunskaar S. Continuity of care for patients with chronic disease: a registry-based observational study from Norway. Fam Pract. 2022;39(4):570–8.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab107
pubmed: 34536072
Verhaak PF, van Dijk CE, Nuijen J, Verheij RA, Schellevis FG. Mental health care as delivered by Dutch general practitioners between 2004 and 2008. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012;30(3):156–62.
doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.688707
pubmed: 22794194
pmcid: 3443939
Wang PS, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Borges G, Bromet EJ, et al. Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveys. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):841–50.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61414-7
pubmed: 17826169
pmcid: 2847360
Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The Public Health Report - The State of Health in Norway 2022 https://www.fhi.no/he/folkehelserapporten/psykisk-helse/psykiske-lidelser-voksne/?term=#forekomst-av-psykiske-plager . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.
Cape J, Whittington C, Buszewicz M, Wallace P, Underwood L. Brief psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):1–13.
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-38
Hetlevik O, Garre-Fivelsdal G, Bjorvatn B, Hjorleifsson S, Ruths S. Patient-reported depression treatment and future treatment preferences: an observational study in general practice. Fam Pract. 2019;36(6):771–7.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz026
pubmed: 31215999
McHugh RK, Whitton SW, Peckham AD, Welge JA, Otto MW. Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(6):13979.
doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07757
Ministry of Health and Welfare. Law on municipal healthcare- services (Lov Om Kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenester). In: LOVDATA, editor.
Helse Norge. Mental health care for adults. 2022. https://www.helsenorge.no/psykisk-helse/psykisk-helsehjelp-for-voksne/ . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.
Norwegian Directorate of Health. General practitioner statistics (Fastlegestatistikk). https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/statistikk/fastlegestatistikk . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.
Statistics Norway. The General Practitioner service (Allmennlegetjenesten). SSB.no. https://www.ssb.no/helse/helsetjenester/statistikk/allmennlegetjenesten/artikler/naer-tre-av-fire-hadde-minst-en-fastlegekonsultasjon-i-2022 . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.
Norwegian Research Centre. Depresjon i allmennpraksis: NORCE; https://www.norceresearch.no/prosjekter/depresjon-i-allmennpraksis . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.
Ruths S, Haukenes I, Hetlevik Ø, Smith-Sivertsen T, Hjørleifsson S, Hansen AB, et al. Trends in treatment for patients with depression in general practice in Norway, 2009–2015: nationwide registry-based cohort study (the Norwegian GP-DEP Study). BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):697.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06712-w
pubmed: 34266438
pmcid: 8283991
Zantinge EM, Verhaak PF, de Bakker DH, Kerssens JJ, van der Meer K, Bensing JM. The workload of general practitioners does not affect their awareness of patients’ psychological problems. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(1–2):93–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.02.006
pubmed: 17382508
Schumann I, Schneider A, Kantert C, Löwe B, Linde K. Physicians’ attitudes, diagnostic process and barriers regarding depression diagnosis in primary care: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Fam Pract. 2012;29(3):255–63.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr092
pubmed: 22016322
Mitchell AJ, Vaze A, Rao S. Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;374(9690):609–19.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60879-5
pubmed: 19640579
Dowrick C. Beyond depression: a new approach to understanding and management. Oxford University Press, USA; 2009.
Chew-Graham CA, Mullin S, May CR, Hedley S, Cole H. Managing depression in primary care: another example of the inverse care law? Fam Pract. 2002;19(6):632–7.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.6.632
pubmed: 12429666
Grung I, Anderssen N, Haukenes I, Ruths S, Smith-Sivertsen T, Hetlevik Ø, et al. Patient experiences with depression care in general practice: a qualitative questionnaire study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022;40(2):253–60.
doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2074069
pubmed: 35603990
pmcid: 9397414
Sidaway-Lee K, Obe DPG, Harding A, Evans P. What mechanisms could link GP relational continuity to patient outcomes? Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(707):278–81.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X716093
pubmed: 34045259
pmcid: 8163455
Bachelor A, Horvath A, Hubble M, Duncan B, Miller S. The heart and soul of change: what works in therapy. Am Psychol Association. 1999:133–78.
Dumesnil H, Cortaredona S, Verdoux H, Sebbah R, Paraponaris A, Verger P. General practitioners’ choices and their determinants when starting treatment for major depression: a cross sectional, randomized case-vignette survey. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e52429.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052429
pubmed: 23272243
pmcid: 3525552
Regulation on the Regular General Practice Scheme in the municipalities (Forskrift om fastlegeordning i kommunene). (2021).
Gidding LG, Spigt MG, Dinant G-J. Stepped collaborative depression care: primary care results before and after implementation of a stepped collaborative depression programme. Fam Pract. 2014;31(2):180–92.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt072
pubmed: 24277384
Magnée T, de Beurs DP, De Bakker DH, Verhaak PF. Consultations in general practices with and without mental health nurses: an observational study from 2010 to 2014. BMJ open. 2016;6(7):e011579.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011579
pubmed: 27431902
pmcid: 4964169
The Norwegian Government. Expert committee for review of the general practitioner service (ekspertutvalg for gjennomgang av allmennlegetjenesten). Regjeringenno 2023.
Norwegian medical assosiation. LEFO - Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession https://www.legeforeningen.no/lefo/english/ . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.
Norwegian Medical Assosication. The Normal Tariff (Normaltariffen). 2023. https://normaltariffen.legeforeningen.no/book/Fastlegetariffen-2023-2024/m-618 . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.