Efficacy and safety of simple analgesics for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache in adults: a network meta-analysis.


Journal

Annals of medicine
ISSN: 1365-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8906388

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2024
Historique:
medline: 30 5 2024
pubmed: 30 5 2024
entrez: 30 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tension-type headache is the most common type of primary headache and results in a huge socioeconomic burden. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of simple analgesics for the treatment of episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) in adults. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese BioMedical Literature database and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for eligible randomized clinical trials reporting the efficacy and/or safety of simple analgesics. A Bayesian NMA was performed to compare relative efficacy and safety. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank interventions. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018090554. We highlighted six studies including 3507 patients. For the 2 h pain-free rate, the SUCRA ranking was ibuprofen > diclofenac-K > ketoprofen > acetaminophen > naproxen > placebo. All drugs except naproxen reported a higher 2 h pain-free rate than placebo, with a risk ratio (RR) of 2.86 (95% credible interval, CrI: 1.62-5.42) for ibuprofen and 2.61 (1.53-4.88) for diclofenac-K. For adverse events rate, the SUCRA ranking was: metamizol > diclofenac-K > ibuprofen > lumiracoxib > placebo > aspirin > acetaminophen > naproxen > ketoprofen. The adverse event rates of all analgesics were no higher than those of placebo, except for ketoprofen. Moreover, all drugs were superior to placebo in the global assessment of efficacy. In particular, the RR of lumiracoxib was 2.47 (1.57-4.57). Global heterogeneity Simple analgesics are considered more effective and safe as a placebo for ETTH in adults. Our results suggest that ibuprofen and diclofenac-K may be the two best treatment options for patients with ETTH from a comprehensive point of view (both high-quality evidence). To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis comparing the available data on adult patients with episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) treated with different simple analgesics recommended by the current guidelines.Ibuprofen (400 mg) and diclofenac-K (12.5 mg, 25 mg) are potentially the most effective and safe treatment options, supported by high-quality evidence.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis comparing the available data on adult patients with episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) treated with different simple analgesics recommended by the current guidelines.Ibuprofen (400 mg) and diclofenac-K (12.5 mg, 25 mg) are potentially the most effective and safe treatment options, supported by high-quality evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38813682
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2357235
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics 0
Ibuprofen WK2XYI10QM
Acetaminophen 362O9ITL9D
Diclofenac 144O8QL0L1
Naproxen 57Y76R9ATQ
Ketoprofen 90Y4QC304K
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2357235

Auteurs

Runsheng Xie (R)

Department of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.

Jiahui Li (J)

The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Yuyu Jing (Y)

The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Jinhui Tian (J)

Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Hui Li (H)

Department of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.

Yefeng Cai (Y)

Department of Internal Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.

Yangyang Wang (Y)

Department of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.

Wenjia Chen (W)

Department of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.

Feilong Xu (F)

Information Management Office, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH