Evaluation of a Computer-Aided Clinical Decision Support System for Point-of-Care Use in Low-Resource Primary Care Settings: Acceptability Evaluation Study.

acceptance caregiver clinical decision support system decision making decision support decision-making evaluation low-resource setting partial least squares structural equation modeling point-of-care instrument structural equation modeling system quality user acceptance users

Journal

JMIR human factors
ISSN: 2292-9495
Titre abrégé: JMIR Hum Factors
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666561

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 28 03 2023
accepted: 20 01 2024
revised: 11 09 2023
medline: 11 6 2024
pubmed: 11 6 2024
entrez: 11 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A clinical decision support system (CDSS) based on the logic and philosophy of clinical pathways is critical for managing the quality of health care and for standardizing care processes. Using such a system at a point-of-care setting is becoming more frequent these days. However, in a low-resource setting (LRS), such systems are frequently overlooked. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the user acceptance of a CDSS in LRSs. The CDSS evaluation was carried out at the Jimma Health Center and the Jimma Higher Two Health Center, Jimma, Ethiopia. The evaluation was based on 22 parameters organized into 6 categories: ease of use, system quality, information quality, decision changes, process changes, and user acceptance. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to investigate whether the difference between the 2 health centers was significant (2-tailed, 95% CI; α=.05). Pearson correlation and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to identify the relationship and factors influencing the overall acceptance of the CDSS in an LRS. On the basis of 116 antenatal care, pregnant patient care, and postnatal care cases, 73 CDSS evaluation responses were recorded. We found that the 2 health centers did not differ significantly on 16 evaluation parameters. We did, however, detect a statistically significant difference in 6 parameters (P<.05). PLS-SEM results showed that the coefficient of determination, R This study concludes that users are more likely to accept and use a CDSS at the point of care when it is easy to grasp the perceived benefits and system quality in terms of health care professionals' needs. We believe that the CDSS acceptance model developed in this study reveals specific factors and variables that constitute a step toward the effective adoption and deployment of a CDSS in LRSs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A clinical decision support system (CDSS) based on the logic and philosophy of clinical pathways is critical for managing the quality of health care and for standardizing care processes. Using such a system at a point-of-care setting is becoming more frequent these days. However, in a low-resource setting (LRS), such systems are frequently overlooked.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the user acceptance of a CDSS in LRSs.
METHODS METHODS
The CDSS evaluation was carried out at the Jimma Health Center and the Jimma Higher Two Health Center, Jimma, Ethiopia. The evaluation was based on 22 parameters organized into 6 categories: ease of use, system quality, information quality, decision changes, process changes, and user acceptance. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to investigate whether the difference between the 2 health centers was significant (2-tailed, 95% CI; α=.05). Pearson correlation and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to identify the relationship and factors influencing the overall acceptance of the CDSS in an LRS.
RESULTS RESULTS
On the basis of 116 antenatal care, pregnant patient care, and postnatal care cases, 73 CDSS evaluation responses were recorded. We found that the 2 health centers did not differ significantly on 16 evaluation parameters. We did, however, detect a statistically significant difference in 6 parameters (P<.05). PLS-SEM results showed that the coefficient of determination, R
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study concludes that users are more likely to accept and use a CDSS at the point of care when it is easy to grasp the perceived benefits and system quality in terms of health care professionals' needs. We believe that the CDSS acceptance model developed in this study reveals specific factors and variables that constitute a step toward the effective adoption and deployment of a CDSS in LRSs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38861298
pii: v11i1e47631
doi: 10.2196/47631
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e47631

Informations de copyright

©Geletaw Sahle Tegenaw, Demisew Amenu Sori, Girum Ketema Teklemariam, Frank Verbeke, Jan Cornelis, Bart Jansen. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 11.06.2024.

Auteurs

Geletaw Sahle Tegenaw (GS)

Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Faculty of Computing, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Demisew Amenu Sori (DA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Health Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Girum Ketema Teklemariam (GK)

Faculty of Computing, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Frank Verbeke (F)

Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.

Jan Cornelis (J)

Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.

Bart Jansen (B)

Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.
Interuniversitair Micro-Electronica Centrum, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH