Metataxonomic analysis of endophytic bacteria of blackberry (Rubus ulmifolius Schott) across tissues and environmental conditions.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
24
01
2024
accepted:
06
06
2024
medline:
12
6
2024
pubmed:
12
6
2024
entrez:
11
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: Endophytic bacteria represent an important component of plant wellness. They have been widely studied for their involvement in plant development and enhancement of stress tolerance. In this work, the endophytic communities of roots, stems, and leaves of blackberry (Rubus ulmifolius Schott) were studied in three different niches: natural, riverside, and human-impacted niches. (2) Results: The microbiome composition revealed that Sphingomonadaceae was the most abundant family in all samples, accounting for 9.4-45.8%. In contrast, other families seem to be linked to a specific tissue or niche. Families Microbacteriaceae and Hymenobacteraceae increased their presence in stem and leaf samples, while Burkholderiaceae abundance was important in riverside samples. Alpha and beta diversity analyses showed that root samples were the most diverse, and they gathered together in the same cluster, apart from the rest of the samples. (3) Conclusions: The analysis of the microbiome of R. ulmifolius plants revealed that the composition was essentially the same in different niches; the differences were primarily influenced by plant tissue factors with a core genome dominated by Sphingomonadaceae. Additionally, it was observed that R. ulmifolius can select its own microbiome, and this remains constant in all tissues evaluated regardless the niche of sampling.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38862607
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64248-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-64248-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13388Subventions
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
ID : PRE2020-09476
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
ID : PID2019-109960RB-I00
Organisme : European Commission
ID : 101034371
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Knelman, J. E. et al. Interspecific plant interactions reflected in soil bacterial community structure and nitrogen cycling in primary succession. Front. Microbiol. 9, 128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00128 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00128
pubmed: 29467741
pmcid: 5808232
Yang, R., Liu, P. & Ye, W. Illumina-based analysis of endophytic bacterial diversity of tree peony (Paeonia Sect. Moutan) roots and leaves. Braz. J. Microbiol. 48, 695. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BJM.2017.02.0095 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/J.BJM.2017.02.0095
pubmed: 28606427
pmcid: 5628320
Riva, V., Mapelli, F., Bagnasco, A., Mengoni, A. & Borin, S. A meta-analysis approach to defining the culturable core of plant endophytic bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88, e02537-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02537-21 (2022).
doi: 10.1128/aem.02537-21
pubmed: 35138928
pmcid: 8939329
Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T. & Singh, B. K. Plant–microbiome interactions: From community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1811(18), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1
Nguyen, M. P. et al. Host species shape the community structure of culturable endophytes in fruits of wild berry species (Vaccinium myrtillus L., Empetrum nigrum L. and Vaccinium vitisidaea L.). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 97, 097. https://doi.org/10.1093/FEMSEC/FIAB097 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/FEMSEC/FIAB097
Bulgari, D., Casati, P., Quaglino, F. & Bianco, P. A. Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process. BMC Microbiol. 14, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-14-198/TABLES/6 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-198/TABLES/6
Contreras, M., Loeza, P. D., Villegas, J., Farias, R. & Santoyo, G. A glimpse of the endophytic bacterial diversity in roots of blackberry plants (Rubus fruticosus). Genet. Mol. Res. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15038542 (2016).
doi: 10.4238/gmr.15038542
pubmed: 27706727
White, J. F. et al. Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. Pest Manag. Sci. 75, 2558. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5527 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/ps.5527
pubmed: 31228333
pmcid: 6771842
Gouda, S., Das, G., Sen, S. K., Shin, H. S. & Patra, J. K. Endophytes: A treasure house of bioactive compounds of medicinal importance. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2016.01538 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2016.01538
pubmed: 27746767
pmcid: 5041141
Khan, S. S., Verma, V. & Rasool, S. Diversity and the role of endophytic bacteria: A review. Botanica Serbica 44, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.2298/BOTSERB2002103K (2020).
doi: 10.2298/BOTSERB2002103K
Roca-Couso, R., Flores-Félix, J. D. & Rivas, R. Mechanisms of action of microbial biocontrol agents against Botrytis cinerea. J. Fungi 7, 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOF7121045 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/JOF7121045
Ryan, R. P., Germaine, K., Franks, A., Ryan, D. J. & Dowling, D. N. Bacterial endophytes: Recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00918.x (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00918.x
pubmed: 18034833
Burragoni, S. G. & Jeon, J. Applications of endophytic microbes in agriculture, biotechnology, medicine, and beyond. Microbiol. Res. 245, 126691. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICRES.2020.126691 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/J.MICRES.2020.126691
pubmed: 33508761
Ayuso-Calles, M. et al. Rhizobium laguerreae improves productivity and phenolic compound content of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) under saline stress conditions. Foods 9, 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091166 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/foods9091166
pubmed: 32847018
pmcid: 7555320
Guo, B., Wang, Y., Sun, X. & Tang, K. Bioactive natural products from endophytes: A review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 44, 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683808020026 (2008).
doi: 10.1134/S0003683808020026
Syranidou, E. et al. Exploitation of endophytic bacteria to enhance the phytoremediation potential of the wetland helophyte Juncus acutus. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1016. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2016.01016/BIBTEX (2016).
doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2016.01016/BIBTEX
pubmed: 27458433
pmcid: 4930943
Agnolucci, M. et al. Beneficial plant microorganisms affect the endophytic bacterial communities of durum wheat roots as detected by different molecular approaches. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2500. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2019.02500/BIBTEX (2019).
doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2019.02500/BIBTEX
pubmed: 31736925
pmcid: 6834690
Afridi, M. S. et al. New opportunities in plant microbiome engineering for increasing agricultural sustainability under stressful conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 899464. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2022.899464/BIBTEX (2022).
doi: 10.3389/FPLS.2022.899464/BIBTEX
pubmed: 36186071
pmcid: 9524194
Zhao, J. et al. Isolation, identification and characterization of endophytic Bacterium Rhizobium oryzihabitans sp. Nov., from rice root with biotechnological potential in agriculture. Microorganism 8, 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS8040608 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS8040608
Cochard, B. et al. Endophytic PGPR from tomato roots: Isolation, in vitro characterization and in vivo evaluation of treated tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Microorganisms 10, 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS10040765 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS10040765
pubmed: 35456815
pmcid: 9031218
Saito, A., Ikeda, S., Ezura, H. & Minamisawa, K. Microbial community analysis of the phytosphere using culture-independent methodologies. Microbes Environ. 22, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1264/JSME2.22.93 (2007).
doi: 10.1264/JSME2.22.93
Brennan, R. M. et al. Berry crops. Hortic. Plants People Places 1, 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8578-5_9 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8578-5_9
Gonçalves, A. C. et al. Insight into the taxonomic and functional diversity of bacterial communities inhabiting blueberries in Portugal. Microorganisms 10, 2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112193 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10112193
pubmed: 36363783
pmcid: 9695653
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.14806/EJ.17.1.200 (2011).
doi: 10.14806/EJ.17.1.200
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41587-019-0209-9 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/S41587-019-0209-9
pubmed: 31341288
pmcid: 7015180
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKS1219 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/NAR/GKS1219
pubmed: 24293649
pmcid: 3965112
Zakrzewski, M. et al. Calypso: A user-friendly web-server for mining and visualizing microbiome-environment interactions. Bioinformatics 33, 782–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTW725 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTW725
pubmed: 28025202
Roger, B. J. & Curts, J. T. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268 (1957).
doi: 10.2307/1942268
Lin, H. & Das, P. S. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun. 18, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-020-17041-7 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/S41467-020-17041-7
Saati-santamaría Z, Vicentefranqueira R, Kolařik M, Rivas R. In press. Microbiome specificity and fluxes between two distant plant taxa in Iberian forests. , 1–16.
Farda, B. et al. Microbial community investigation of wild brambles with root nodulation from a calcareous nitrogen-deficient soil. Soil Syst. 6, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOILSYSTEMS6040096/S1 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/SOILSYSTEMS6040096/S1
Jones, P., Garcia, B. J., Furches, A., Tuskan, G. A. & Jacobson, D. Plant host-associated mechanisms for microbial selection. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 862. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2019.00862/BIBTEX (2019).
doi: 10.3389/FPLS.2019.00862/BIBTEX
pubmed: 31333701
pmcid: 6618679
Daniel, R. The metagenomics of soil. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1160 (2005).
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1160
pubmed: 15931165
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., Van Themaat, E. V. L. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 807–838. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 (2013).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106
pubmed: 23373698
Gottel, N. R. et al. Distinct microbial communities within the endosphere and rhizosphere of populus deltoides roots across contrasting soil types. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 5934. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05255-11 (2011).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.05255-11
pubmed: 21764952
pmcid: 3165402
Hardoim, P. R. et al. The hidden world within plants: Ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00050-14 (2015).
doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00050-14
pubmed: 26136581
pmcid: 4488371
Liu, H. et al. Inner plant values: Diversity, colonization and benefits from endophytic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2552. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2017.02552/BIBTEX (2017).
doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2017.02552/BIBTEX
pubmed: 29312235
pmcid: 5742157
Kalpana, K. et al. Abundance of plant-associated gammaproteobacteria correlates with immunostimulatory activity of angelica sinensis. Medicines 6, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/MEDICINES6020062 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/MEDICINES6020062
pubmed: 31159200
pmcid: 6631519
Pini, F., Galardini, M., Bazzicalupo, M. & Mengoni, A. Plant-bacteria association and symbiosis: Are there common genomic traits in Alphaproteobacteria?. Genes (Basel) 2, 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/GENES2041017 (2011).
doi: 10.3390/GENES2041017
pubmed: 24710303
Bulgarelli, D. et al. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host Microbe 17, 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.011 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.011
pubmed: 25732064
pmcid: 4362959
Boukhatem, Z. F., Merabet, C. & Tsaki, H. Plant growth promoting actinobacteria, the most promising candidates as bioinoculants?. Front. Agron. 4, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/FAGRO.2022.849911/BIBTEX (2022).
doi: 10.3389/FAGRO.2022.849911/BIBTEX
Pérez-Jaramillo, J. E., Carrión, V. J., de Hollander, M. & Raaijmakers, J. M. The wild side of plant microbiomes. Microbiome https://doi.org/10.1186/S40168-018-0519-Z (2018).
doi: 10.1186/S40168-018-0519-Z
pubmed: 30115122
pmcid: 6097318
Zarraonaindia, I. et al. The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. MBio https://doi.org/10.1128/MBIO.02527-14 (2015).
doi: 10.1128/MBIO.02527-14
pubmed: 25805735
pmcid: 4453523
Thomas, P. & Sahu, P. K. Vertical transmission of diverse cultivation-recalcitrant endophytic bacteria elucidated using watermelon seed embryos. Front. Microbiol. 12, 635810. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2021.635810/BIBTEX (2021).
doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2021.635810/BIBTEX
pubmed: 34867834
pmcid: 8634838
Verma, S. K. et al. Endophyte roles in nutrient acquisition, root system architecture development and oxidative stress tolerance. Appl. Microbiol. 75, 1596–1606. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15111 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/jam.15111
Kandel, S. L., Joubert, P. M. & Doty, S. L. Bacterial endophyte colonization and distribution within plants. Microorganisms https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS5040077 (2017).
doi: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS5040077
pubmed: 29186821
pmcid: 5748586
Morella, N. M. et al. Successive passaging of a plant-associated microbiome reveals robust habitat and host genotype-dependent selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1148–1159. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1908600116/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.1908600116.SAPP.PDF (2020).
doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1908600116/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.1908600116.SAPP.PDF
pubmed: 31806755
Berg, G. & Cernava, T. The plant microbiota signature of the Anthropocene as a challenge for microbiome research. Microbiome 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40168-021-01224-5/FIGURES/1 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/S40168-021-01224-5/FIGURES/1
Gutierrez, A. & Grillo, M. A. Effects of domestication on plant-microbiome interactions. Plant Cell Physiol. 63, 1654–1666. https://doi.org/10.1093/PCP/PCAC108 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/PCP/PCAC108
pubmed: 35876043