Transcriptome variations in hybrids of wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides).

Cytosine methylation Hybrids RNA-seq Transcriptome Wild emmer wheat

Journal

BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 23 10 2023
accepted: 06 06 2024
medline: 18 6 2024
pubmed: 18 6 2024
entrez: 17 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Wild emmer wheat is a great candidate to revitalize domesticated wheat genetic diversity. Recent years have seen intensive investigation into the evolution and domestication of wild emmer wheat, including whole-genome DNA and transcriptome sequencing. However, the impact of intraspecific hybridization on the transcriptome of wild emmer wheat has been poorly studied. In this study, we assessed changes in methylation patterns and transcriptomic variations in two accessions of wild emmer wheat collected from two marginal populations, Mt. Hermon and Mt. Amasa, and in their stable F4 hybrid. Methylation-Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) detected significant cytosine demethylation in F4 hybrids vs. parental lines, suggesting potential transcriptome variation. After a detailed analysis, we examined nine RNA-Seq samples, which included three biological replicates from the F4 hybrid and its parental lines. RNA-Seq databases contained approximately 200 million reads, with each library consisting of 15 to 25 million reads. There are a total of 62,490 well-annotated genes in these databases, with 6,602 genes showing differential expression between F4 hybrid and parental lines Mt. Hermon and Mt. Amasa. The differentially expressed genes were classified into four main categories based on their expression patterns. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that differentially expressed genes are associated with DNA/RNA metabolism, photosynthesis, stress response, phosphorylation and developmental processes. This study highlights the significant transcriptomic changes resulting from intraspecific hybridization within natural plant populations, which might aid the nascent hybrid in adapting to various environmental conditions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Wild emmer wheat is a great candidate to revitalize domesticated wheat genetic diversity. Recent years have seen intensive investigation into the evolution and domestication of wild emmer wheat, including whole-genome DNA and transcriptome sequencing. However, the impact of intraspecific hybridization on the transcriptome of wild emmer wheat has been poorly studied. In this study, we assessed changes in methylation patterns and transcriptomic variations in two accessions of wild emmer wheat collected from two marginal populations, Mt. Hermon and Mt. Amasa, and in their stable F4 hybrid.
RESULTS RESULTS
Methylation-Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) detected significant cytosine demethylation in F4 hybrids vs. parental lines, suggesting potential transcriptome variation. After a detailed analysis, we examined nine RNA-Seq samples, which included three biological replicates from the F4 hybrid and its parental lines. RNA-Seq databases contained approximately 200 million reads, with each library consisting of 15 to 25 million reads. There are a total of 62,490 well-annotated genes in these databases, with 6,602 genes showing differential expression between F4 hybrid and parental lines Mt. Hermon and Mt. Amasa. The differentially expressed genes were classified into four main categories based on their expression patterns. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that differentially expressed genes are associated with DNA/RNA metabolism, photosynthesis, stress response, phosphorylation and developmental processes.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights the significant transcriptomic changes resulting from intraspecific hybridization within natural plant populations, which might aid the nascent hybrid in adapting to various environmental conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38886665
doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05258-3
pii: 10.1186/s12870-024-05258-3
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

571

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Funct Integr Genomics. 2017 May;17(2-3):171-187
pubmed: 27032785
Genet Mol Res. 2014 Oct 20;13(4):8458-68
pubmed: 25366740
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2018 Aug 25;56:67-87
pubmed: 30149791
Theor Appl Genet. 2021 Mar;134(3):909-921
pubmed: 33392708
Nat Genet. 2020 Dec;52(12):1412-1422
pubmed: 33106631
Mol Genet Genomics. 2016 Aug;291(4):1681-94
pubmed: 27142109
New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(1):314-322
pubmed: 23121242
J Exp Bot. 2015 Jun;66(12):3477-86
pubmed: 25821073
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(2):453-67
pubmed: 21030385
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Oct 27;17(1):175
pubmed: 29078757
Mol Gen Genet. 1999 Apr;261(3):439-46
pubmed: 10323223
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Jun;115(1):19-26
pubmed: 17447050
Genome. 2011 Jan;54(1):42-9
pubmed: 21217805
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 1;113(44):E6895-E6902
pubmed: 27791153
Plant Cell. 2001 Aug;13(8):1749-59
pubmed: 11487690
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Aug 14;15:200
pubmed: 26272589
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Aug 25;12:687094
pubmed: 34512685
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):6805-10
pubmed: 16641103
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D682-D688
pubmed: 31691826
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Apr;33(4):984-94
pubmed: 26685177
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21800
pubmed: 21789182
F1000Res. 2015 Dec 30;4:1521
pubmed: 26925227
J Exp Bot. 2000 Apr;51(345):659-68
pubmed: 10938857
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jun;17(6):851-62
pubmed: 10833191
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16 Suppl 18:S7
pubmed: 26678818
Nat Genet. 2008 May;40(5):491-2
pubmed: 18443580
Genetics. 2005 Nov;171(3):1267-75
pubmed: 16020790
Fly (Austin). 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):80-92
pubmed: 22728672
J Exp Bot. 2011 Mar;62(6):1951-60
pubmed: 21193578
Science. 2017 Jul 7;357(6346):93-97
pubmed: 28684525
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:617-50
pubmed: 10966471
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2022 Apr;21(4):471-491
pubmed: 35411484
Plant Physiol. 2015 Aug;168(4):1197-205
pubmed: 26002907
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Jun;22(6):472-490
pubmed: 28389147
Bioinformatics. 2001 Sep;17(9):763-74
pubmed: 11590094
Genes Dev. 2020 Jan 1;34(1-2):24-36
pubmed: 31896690
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:235-61
pubmed: 20192734
Nat Methods. 2017 Apr;14(4):417-419
pubmed: 28263959
Mol Gen Genet. 1997 Feb 27;253(6):703-10
pubmed: 9079881
BMC Genomics. 2019 Feb 27;20(1):160
pubmed: 30813897
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W122-W129
pubmed: 28472432
Plant Physiol. 2017 Jan;173(1):65-78
pubmed: 27895205

Auteurs

Alon Ziv (A)

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.

Khalil Kashkush (K)

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel. kashkush@bgu.ac.il.

Articles similaires

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger
Animals Lung India Sheep Transcriptome

Revealing molecular mechanisms of early-onset tongue cancer by spatial transcriptomics.

Marina R Patysheva, Elena S Kolegova, Anna A Khozyainova et al.
1.00
Humans Tongue Neoplasms Male Adult Middle Aged

Classifications MeSH