Acceptability of Using a Decision Aid to Support Family Carers of People With Dementia Towards the End of Life: A Qualitative Study.


Journal

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
ISSN: 1369-7625
Titre abrégé: Health Expect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
revised: 13 05 2024
received: 22 03 2024
accepted: 07 06 2024
medline: 19 6 2024
pubmed: 19 6 2024
entrez: 19 6 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To explore the experiences, acceptability and utility of a decision aid for family carers of people with dementia towards the end of life. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of family carers enroled into a 6-month feasibility study in England, sampling to gain a range of experiences and views, based on relationship to person they cared for (e.g., spouse, adult child), age, gender, and self-reported use of the decision aid during the feasibility study. Interviews were conducted in March 2021-July 2021 and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. We used COREQ checklist to report our methods and results. Family carers found the decision aid acceptable, describing it as comprehensive, accessible with relevant information and its presentation enabled good engagement. Experiences of the decision aid covered four main themes which demonstrated the perceived acceptability and utility: 1. A source of support and reassurance; 2. Empowering conversations and confidence; 3. Including the person living with dementia; and 4. Breaking down complexity. An aid focussing on decisions about dementia end of life care supported family carers break down complex and emotive decisions, not only with making decisions in the moment but also in future planning. Our three Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) members (all former family carers) were crucial throughout the wider study. PPI supported development of the topic guides, supported trialling the topic guide and interview procedures and finally supported the development of themes as part of the analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38896012
doi: 10.1111/hex.14123
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14123

Subventions

Organisme : Alzheimer's Society
ID : AS-JF-16b-012
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

N. Davies, T. De Souza, G. Rait, J. Meehan, and E. L. Sampson, “Developing an Applied Model for Making Decisions Towards the End of Life About Care for Someone With Dementia,” PLoS One 16, no. 5 (2021): e0252464.
C. Sinclair, K. Gersbach, M. Hogan, et al., “How Couples with Dementia Experience Healthcare, Lifestyle, and Everyday Decision‐Making,” International Psychogeriatrics 30, no. 11 (2018): 1639–1647.
N. Davies, J. Manthorpe, E. L. Sampson, et al., “Guiding Practitioners Through End of Life Care for People With Dementia: The Use of Heuristics,” PLoS One 13, no. 11 (2018): e0206422.
O. St‐Amant, C. Ward‐Griffin, R. T. DeForge, et al., “Making Care Decisions in Home‐Based Dementia Care: Why Context Matters,” Canadian Journal on Aging/La revue canadienne du vieillissement 31, no. 4 (2012): 423–434.
Department of Health. Mental Capacity Act (London: Stationary Office, 2005).
M. Raymond, A. Warner, N. Davies, et al., “Evaluating Educational Initiatives to Improve Palliative Care for People With Dementia: A Narrative Review,” Dementia 13, no. 3 (2014): 366–381.
D. Edvardsson, B. Winblad, and P. Sandman, “Person‐Centred Care of People With Severe Alzheimer's Disease: Current Status and Ways Forward,” Lancet Neurology 7, no. 4 (2008): 362–367.
R. Mathew, N. Davies, J. Manthorpe, and S. Iliffe, “Making Decisions at the End of Life When Caring for a Person With Dementia: A Literature Review to Explore the Potential Use of Heuristics in Difficult Decision‐Making,” BMJ Open 6(2016): e010416, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010416.
S. J. Cresp, S. F. Lee, and C. Moss, “Substitute Decision Makers' Experiences of Making Decisions at End of Life for Older Persons With Dementia: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta‐Synthesis,” Dementia 19, no. 5 (2020): 1532–1559.
H. Noh and J. Kwak, “End‐of‐Life Decision Making for Persons With Dementia: Proxies' Perception of Support,” Dementia 17, no. 4 (2018): 478–493.
A. M. O'Connor, P. Tugwell, G. A. Wells, et al., “A Decision Aid for Women Considering Hormone Therapy After Menopause: Decision Support Framework and Evaluation,” Patient Education and Counseling 33, no. 3 (1998): 267–279.
F. Légaré, D. Stacey, S. Gagnon, et al., “Validating a Conceptual Model for an Inter‐Professional Approach to Shared Decision Making: A Mixed Methods Study,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17, no. 4 (2011): 554–564.
D. Stacey, F. Légaré, K. Lewis, et al., “Decision Aids for People Facing Health Treatment or Screening Decisions,” The Cochrane Library 12, no. 4 (2017).
D. Stacey, F. Légaré, L. Boland, et al., “20th Anniversary Ottawa Decision Support Framework: Part 3 Overview of Systematic Reviews and Updated Framework,” Medical Decision Making 40, no. 3 (2020): 379–398.
M. Cardona‐Morrell, G. Benfatti‐Olivato, J. Jansen, R. M. Turner, D. Fajardo‐Pulido, and K. Hillman, “A Systematic Review of Effectiveness of Decision Aids to Assist Older Patients at the End of Life,” Patient Education and Counseling 100, no. 3 (2017): 425–435.
N. Davies, E. L. Sampson, E. West, et al., “A Decision Aid to Support Family Carers of People Living With Dementia Towards the End of Life: Co‐Production Process, Outcome And Reflections,” Health Expectations 24, no. 5 (2021): 1677–1691.
N. Davies, B. Schiowitz, G. Rait, V. Vickerstaff, and E. L. Sampson, “Decision Aids to Support Decision Making in Dementia Care: A Systematic Review,” International Psychogeriatrics 31, no. 10 (2019): 1403–1419.
A. Geddis‐Regan, L. Errington, C. Abley, R. Wassall, C. Exley, and R. Thomson, “Enhancing Shared and Surrogate Decision Making for People Living With Dementia: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Interventions,” Health Expectations 24, no. 1 (2021): 19–32.
A. Tong, P. Sainsbury, and J. Craig, “Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (Coreq): A 32‐Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups,” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, no. 6 (2007): 349–357.
N. Davies, N. Aker, V. Vickerstaff, E. L. Sampson, and G. Rait, “A Feasibility Study of a Decision Aid to Support Family Carers of People with Severe Dementia or Those Towards the End‐of‐Life,” Palliative Medicine 36 (2022): 1432–1439.
K. Malterud, V. D. Siersma, and A. D. Guassora, “Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided By Information Power,” Qualitative Health Research 26, no. 13 (2016): 1753–1760.
L. J. Damschroder, D. C. Aron, R. E. Keith, S. R. Kirsh, J. A. Alexander, and J. C. Lowery, “Fostering Implementation of Health Services Research Findings Into Practice: A Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science,” Implementation Science 4, no. 1 (2009): 50.
N. Joseph‐Williams, P. Abhyankar, L. Boland, et al., “What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update From the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration,” Medical Decision Making 41, no. 7 (2020): 907–937.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide (London: Sage, 2021).
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, no. 3 (2021): 328–352.
“Nvivo,” QSR International Pty Ltd (released in March 2020), 2020.
D. Nimmons, J. Manthorpe, E. West, et al., “Views of People Living With Dementia and Their Carers on Their Present and Future: A Qualitative Study,” BMC Palliative Care 22, no. 1 (2023): 38.
K. Anantapong, N. Davies, J. Chan, D. McInnerney, and E. L. Sampson, “Mapping and Understanding the Decision‐Making Process for Providing Nutrition and Hydration to People Living with Dementia: A Systematic Review,” BMC Geriatrics 20, no. 1 (2020): 520.
K. Anantapong, Y. Barrado‐Martín, P. Nair, et al., “How Do People Living With Dementia Perceive Eating and Drinking Difficulties? A Qualitative Study,” Age and Ageing 50, no. 5 (2021): 1820–1828.
E. West, K. Moore, N. Kupeli, et al., “Rapid Review of Decision‐Making for Place of Care and Death in Older People: Lessons for COVID‐19,” Age and Ageing 50, no. 2 (2020): 294–306.
K. E. Schlag, K. C. Britt, J. Kwak, D. R. Burrows, and L. Fry, “Decision‐Support Needs of Caregivers Considering Hospice Enrollment for a Family Member With Dementia,” American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® 39, no. 7 (2022): 812–821.
A. Roach, A. H. Rogers, M. Hendricksen, E. P. McCarthy, S. L. Mitchell, and R. P. Lopez, “Guilt as an Influencer in End‐of‐Life Care Decisions for Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia,” Journal of Gerontological Nursing 48, no. 1 (2022): 22–27.
N. Aker, E. West, N. Davies, et al., “Challenges Faced during the Covid‐19 Pandemic by Family Carers of People Living With Dementia Towards the End of Life,” BMC Health Services Research 21, no. 1 (2021): 996.
E. West, P. Nair, Y. Barrado‐Martin, et al., “Exploration of the Impact of the Covid‐19 Pandemic on People With Dementia and Carers From Black and Minority Ethnic Groups,” BMJ Open 11, no. 5 (2021): e050066.
R. Davis, M. K. Ziomkowski, and A. Veltkamp, “Everyday Decision Making in Individuals With Early‐Stage Alzheimer's Disease: An Integrative Review of the Literature,” Research in Gerontological Nursing 10, no. 5 (2017): 240–247.
J. Bhatt, H. Walton, C. R. Stoner, K. Scior, and G. Charlesworth, “The Nature of Decision‐Making in People Living With Dementia: A Systematic Review,” Aging & Mental Health 24, no. 3 (2020): 363–373.
D. Fetherstonhaugh, L. Tarzia, and R. Nay, “Being Central to Decision Making Means I Am Still Here!: The Essence of Decision Making for People With Dementia,” Journal of Aging Studies 27, no. 2 (2013): 143–150.
L. C. Hanson, S. Zimmerman, M.‐K. Song, et al., “Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA Internal Medicine 177, no. 1 (2017): 24–31.
A. E. Volandes, M. K. Paasche‐Orlow, M. J. Barry, et al., “Video Decision Support Tool for Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Randomised Controlled Trial,” BMJ 338 (2009): b2159.
D. M. Mann, J. Chen, R. Chunara, P. A. Testa, and O. Nov, “Covid‐19 Transforms Health Care Through Telemedicine: Evidence From the Field,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 27, no. 7 (2020): 1132–1135.
R. Hutchings, “The Impact of Covid‐19 on the Use of Digital Technology in the NHS,” Nuffield Trust 27 (2020): 2002–2008.

Auteurs

Nathan Davies (N)

Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, University College London, London, UK.

Narin Aker (N)

Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, University College London, London, UK.

Emily West (E)

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

Greta Rait (G)

PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

Elizabeth L Sampson (EL)

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal London Hospital, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH