Vinasse treated with charcoal as a molasses diluent for ethanol fermentation.
bagasse
bamboo
biofuel
regeneration
residues
straw
Journal
Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
ISSN: 0273-1223
Titre abrégé: Water Sci Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9879497
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
28
11
2023
accepted:
23
05
2024
medline:
15
7
2024
pubmed:
15
7
2024
entrez:
15
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The demand for new products derived from agro-industrial residues has increased recently. Furthermore, vinasse, a wastewater from ethanol production, needs treatment to be reused in the sugarcane industry, reducing industrial water consumption. This study performed vinasse filtration with charcoal from industrial sugarcane residues and used filtered molasses dilution in ethanolic fermentation. There were five treatments in randomized blocks with three repetitions. The treatments included deionized water and natural vinasse as positive and negative controls, respectively, and filtered vinasse from charcoal made from bamboo, sugarcane bagasse, and straw. Hence, fermentation for ethanol production was performed. Compared with natural vinasse, filtered vinasse with all types of charcoal showed lower soluble solids, total residual reducing sugars, higher ethanol concentrations, and greater fermentative efficiency. Filtered vinasse from bagasse and straw charcoals had efficiencies of 81.14% and 77.98%, respectively, in terms of ethanol production, which are close to those of deionized water (81.49%). In a hypothetical industry, vinasse charcoal filtration and charcoal regeneration should prevent 84.12% of water consumption from environmental resources. This process is feasible because it uses a product of sugarcane residue to treat wastewater and reduce industrial water consumption and vinasse disposal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39007304
pii: wst_2024_200
doi: 10.2166/wst.2024.200
doi:
Substances chimiques
Charcoal
16291-96-6
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
Industrial Waste
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18-31Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare there is no conflict.
Références
Almeida J. C. d., Aferri G., Bortoletto A. M., Alcarde A. R. & Costa G. H. G. 2020 Cachaça production from sugarcane infested by
Almerindo G. I. & Rossol H. V. 2023 Analysis of the economic feasibility of industrial production of charcoal from malt bagasse. Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental 28, 1–8.
Aquino J. C. S. d. & Paula N. F. d. 2015 Production and evaluation of quality of bamboo. In: In: Bovério, M. A. (ed.) III Simpósio de Tecnologia Sucroenergética. Ciência & Tecnologia Fatec JB, Jaboticabal, pp. 73–76.
Barbosa J. C. & Maldonado Júnior W. 2015 Experimentação Agronômica E Agroestat – Sistema Para Análises Estatísticas de Ensaios Agronômicos. Gráfica Multipress Ltda, Jaboticabal.
Basso L. C., De Amorim H. V., De Oliveira A. J. & Lopes M. L. 2008 Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Research 8 (7), 1155–1163.
pubmed: 18752628
Centro de Tecnologia Canavieiro 2011 Métodos analíticos. In: Manual de Controle Químico da Fabricação de Açúcar. Centro de Tecnologia Canavieria, Piracicaba, p. 49.
Chaturvedi K., Singhwane A., Dhangar M., Mili M., Gorhae N., Naik A., Prashant N., Srivastava A. K. & Verma S. 2023 Bamboo for producing charcoal and biochar for versatile applications. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03715-3.
pmcid: PMC9924895
Cooney D. O., Nagerl A. & Hines A. L. 1983 Solvent regeneration of activated carbon. Water Research 17 (4), 403–410.
Da Silva Fernandes F., De Souza É. S., Carneiro L. M., Alves Silva J. P., De Souza J. V. B., Da Silva Batista J., Sica P., Prado L. M. L. M., Granja P., de Carvalho E. M., Mattos E. d. C., Calegari R. P., Silverio M., Martins B. C., Baptista A. S., Alcantara G. U., Nogueira L. C., Stringaci L. d. A., Moya S. M., Costa G. H. G., Oliveira C. A. d., Oliveira A. L. R. d., Souza M. F. d., Tena M., Buller L. S., Sganzerla W. G., Berni M., Forster-Carneiro T., Solera R., Pérez M., Silva A. L. d., Castañeda-Ayarza J. A., Coradi P. C., Milane L. V., Camilo L. J., Andrade M. G. d. O., Secches T. O., Santos Viera C. F., Pereira T. K. E., Santos V. T. O., Ribeirodos Santos J., Pereira G. A. G., Carazzolle M. F., Jacobus A. P., Gross J., Evans J. H., Ceccato-Antonini S. R., Gombert A. K., Sumikawa V. I. O., Medeiros de Lima A., Eckert C. T., Frigo E. P., Albrecht L. P., Albrecht A. J. P., Christ D., Santos W. G., Berkembrock E. & Egewarth V. A. 2022
De Oliva-Neto P., Dorta C., Azevedo F., Gomes V. & Fernandes D. 2013 The Brazilian technology of fuel ethanol fermentation – Yeast inhibition factors and new perspectives to improve the technology. Formatex 371–379.
De Souza Dias M. O., Maciel Filho R., Mantelatto P. E., Cavalett O., Rossell C. E. V., Bonomi A. & Leal M. R. L. V. 2015 Sugarcane processing for ethanol and sugar in Brazil. Environmental Development 15, 35–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.004.
Dias M. O. S., Cunha M. P., Jesus C. D. F., Rocha G. J. M., Pradella J. G. C., Rossell C. E. V., Maciel Filho R. & Bonomi A. 2011 Second generation ethanol in Brazil: Can it compete with electricity production? Bioresource Technology 102 (19), 8964–8971. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.098.
pubmed: 21795041
Di Natale F., Erto A. & Lancia A. 2013 Desorption of arsenic from exhaust activated carbons used for water purification. Journal of Hazardous Materials 260, 451–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.055.
pubmed: 23811366
Dos Santos e Silva D. F., Bomtempo J. V. & Alves F. C. 2019 Innovation opportunities in the Brazilian sugar-energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production 218, 871–879.
Eeshwarasinghe D., Loganathan P. & Vigneswaran S. 2019 Simultaneous removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals from water using granular activated carbon. Chemosphere 223, 616–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.033.
pubmed: 30798057
Fernandes A. C. 2011 Cálculos na Agroindústria da Cana-de-Açúcar. Sociedade dos Técnicos Açúcareiros e Alcooleiros do Brasil – STAB, Piracicaba.
Formann S., Hahn A., Janke L., Stinner W., Sträuber H., Logroño W. & Nikolausz M. 2020 Beyond sugar and ethanol production: Value generation opportunities through sugarcane residues. Frontiers in Energy Research 8, 1–21.
Franz M., Arafat H. A. & Pinto N. G. 2000 Effect of chemical surface heterogeneity on the adsorption mechanism of dissolved aromatics on activated carbon. Carbon 38 (13), 1807–1819.
Gavahian M., Munekata P. E. S., Eş I., Lorenzo J. M., Mousavi Khaneghah A. & Barba F. J. 2019 Emerging techniques in bioethanol production: From distillation to waste valorization. Green Chemistry 21 (6), 1171–1185.
Hashim D. S. B., Liew J. Y., Boon J. G. & Ch'ng H. Y. 2022 Multipurpose applications of bamboo as an activated carbon: An overview. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 14 (2), 522–530.
Heidari A., Lotfollahi M. N. & Baseri H. 2013 Regeneration of activated carbon loaded with cyclohexane using supercritical carbon dioxide: Experimental results and modeling. Chemical Engineering and Technology 36 (2), 315–322.
Hernandez L. A. & Harriott P. 1976 Regeneration of powdered active carbon in fluidized bed. Environmental Science and Technology 10 (5), 454–456.
Kim M. H., Jeong I. T., Park S. B. & Kim J. W. 2019 Analysis of environmental impact of activated carbon production from wood waste. Environmental Engineering Research 24 (1), 117–126.
Liu J., Liu Q. & Yang H. 2016 Assessing water scarcity by simultaneously considering environmental flow requirements, water quantity, and water quality. Ecological Indicators 60, 434–441.
Lopes M. L., Paulillo S. C. d. L., Godoy A., Cherubin R. A., Lorenzi M. S., Giometti F. H. C., Bernardino C. D., Amorim Neto H. B. d. & Amorim H. V. d. 2016 Ethanol production in Brazil: A bridge between science and industry. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 47, 1–13. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1517838216310346.
pmcid: PMC5156502
Loya-González D., Loredo-Cancino M., Soto-Regalado E., Rivas-García P., Cerino-Córdova F. d. J., García-Reyes R. B., Bustos-Martínez D. & Estrada-Baltazar A. 2019 Optimal activated carbon production from corn pericarp: A life cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 219, 316–325.
Lu P. J., Lin H. C., Yu W. T. & Chern J. M. 2011 Chemical regeneration of activated carbon used for dye adsorption. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 42 (2), 305–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2010.06.001.
Madaleno L. L., Minari G. D., Annunzio F. R. D., Frigieri M. C., Produção A., Faculdade V. & Jaboticabal D. T. D. 2016 Use of antimicrobials for contamination control during ethanolic fermentation utilização de antimicrobianos para o controle da contaminação durante a fermentação etanólica. Científica 44 (2), 226–234.
Madaleno L. L., Souza A. C. D. O., Sugahara M., Nádia F. d. P., Saran L. M. & Frigieri M. C. 2017 Posttreatment of cachaca (Brazilian sugarcane spirit) with charcoal made from cane bagasse. African Journal of Microbiology Research 11 (7), 287–295. Available from: http://academicjournals.org/journal/AJMR/article-abstract/B09ECC362919.
Madaleno L. L., Barros V. G. d., Kesserling M. A., Teixeira J. R., Duda R. M. & Oliveira R. A. d. 2020 The recycling of biodigested vinasse in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor is a feasible approach for the conservation of freshwater in the biofuel ethanol industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 262, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121196.
Najafi M., Abousadi Z. A., Honarvar B. & Sajadian S. A. 2022 Separation of hydrocarbons from activated carbon as a porous substance in a glycol regeneration process using supercritical carbon dioxide. Scientific Reports 12 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23722-8.
pmcid: PMC8738756
pubmed: 34992227
Navarro A. R., Sepúlveda M. d. C. & Rubio M. C. 2000 Bioconcentration of vinasse from the alcoholic fermentation of sugarcane molasses. Waste Management 20 (7), 581–585.
Niazi L., Lashanizadegan A. & Sharififard H. 2018 Chestnut oak shells activated carbon: Preparation, characterization and application for Cr (VI) removal from dilute aqueous solutions. Journal of Cleaner Production 185, 554–561.
Palacios-Bereche M. C., Palacios-Bereche R., Ensinas A. V., Gallego A. G., Modesto M. & Nebra S. A. 2022 Brazilian sugarcane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management. Energy 259, 124903.
Parsaee M., Kiani M. K. D. & Karimi K. 2019 A review of biogas production from sugarcane vinasse. Biomass and Bioenergy 122, 117–125.
Przepiórski J. 2006 Chapter 9 Activated carbon filters and their industrial applications. Interface Science and Technology 7, 421–474.
Radić D., Stanojević M., Obradović M. & Jovović A. 2017 Thermal analysis of physical and chemical changes occurring during regeneration of activated carbon. Thermal Science 21 (2), 1067–1081.
Ribeiro N. N., Cazadore V. C. & Madaleno L. L. 2022 Use of distillery effluents in dilution of molasses for ethanol production. Sugar Tech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01202-7.
Salvador F., Martin-Sanchez N., Sanchez-Montero M. J., Montero J. & Izquierdo C. 2013 Regeneration of activated carbons contaminated by phenol using supercritical water. Journal of Supercritical Fluids 74, 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2012.11.025.
Sanchez-Montero M. J., Pelaz J., Martin-Sanchez N., Izquierdo C. & Salvador F. 2018 Supercritical regeneration of an activated carbon fiber exhausted with phenol. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 8 (1), 1–14.
Sheintuch M. & Matatov-Meytal Y. I. 1999 Comparison of catalytic processes with other regeneration methods of activated carbon. Catalysis Today 53 (1), 73–80.
Simo M., Brown C. J. & Hlavacek V. 2008 Simulation of pressure swing adsorption in fuel ethanol production process. Computers and Chemical Engineering 32 (7), 1635–1649.
Stambuk B. U. 2019 Yeasts: The leading figures on bioethanol production. In: In: Treichel H., Alves Júnior, S.L., Fongaro, G. & Muller, C. (eds) Ethanol as A Green Alternative Fuel: Insight and Perspectives, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, USA. pp. 57–92.
Ta-Chung A., Chin-Na L., Chang-Hsuan C., Chao-Huei L. & Pei-Ti H. 2008 Thermal retention performance and gas removal effect of bamboo charcoal/PET blended fibers. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering 47 (9), 895–901.
Ushiki I., Kikuchi K., Takahashi N., Sato Y., Ito Y. & Inomata H. 2017 Desorption behavior of various volatile organic compounds from activated carbon in supercritical carbon dioxide: Measurement and kinetic modeling. Journal of Supercritical Fluids 121, 41–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2016.11.007.
Vandenberghe L. P. S., Valladares-Diestra K. K., Bittencourt G. A., Zevallos Torres L. A., Vieira S., Karp S. G., Sydney E. B., de Carvalho J. C., Thomaz Soccol V. & Soccol C. R. 2022 Beyond sugar and ethanol: The future of sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 167, 112721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112721.
Wang Y., Wang S. l., Xie T. & Cao J. 2020 Activated carbon derived from waste tangerine seed for the high-performance adsorption of carbamate pesticides from water and plant. Bioresource Technology 316, 123929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123929.
pubmed: 32763805
Yaghmaeian K., Moussavi G. & Alahabadi A. 2014 Removal of amoxicillin from contaminated water using NH4Cl-activated carbon: CONTINUOUS flow fixed-bed adsorption and catalytic ozonation regeneration. Chemical Engineering Journal 236, 538–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.118.