Ascending Aortic Progression After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients with Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
Humans
Male
Female
Retrospective Studies
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease
/ surgery
Middle Aged
Aortic Valve
/ surgery
Aged
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
/ mortality
Aorta
/ surgery
Heart Valve Diseases
/ surgery
Tricuspid Valve
/ surgery
Disease Progression
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Postoperative Complications
Aortic Valve Replacement
Ascending Aorta
Bicuspid Aortic Valve
Clinical Outcome
Tricuspid Aortic Valve
Journal
Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1678-9741
Titre abrégé: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101677045
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jul 2024
22 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
22
7
2024
pubmed:
22
7
2024
entrez:
22
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aims of the present study were to compare the long-term outcomes for ascending aortic dilatation and adverse aortic events after isolated aortic valve replacement between patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve ( TAV). This retrospective study included 310 patients who had undergone isolated aortic valve replacement with an ascending aorta diameter ≤ 45 mm between January 2010 and September 2021. The patients were divided into BAV group (n=90) and TAV group (n=220). The differences in the dilation rate of the ascending aorta and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Overall survival was 89 ± 4% in the BAV group vs. 75 ± 6% in the TAV group at 10 years postoperatively (P=0.007), yet this difference disappeared after adjusting exclusively for age (P=0.343). The mean annual growth rate of the ascending aorta was similar between the two groups during follow-up (0.5 ± 0.6 mm/year vs. 0.4 ± 0.5 mm/year; P=0.498). Ten-year freedom from adverse aortic events was 98.1% in the BAV group vs. 95.0% in the TAV group (P=0.636). Multivariable analysis revealed preoperative ascending aorta diameter to be a significant predictor of adverse aortic events (hazard ratio: 1.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.33 to 2.38; P<0.001). Our study revealed that the long-term survival and the risks of adverse aortic events between BAV and TAV patients were similar after isolated aortic valve replacement. BAV was not a risk factor of adverse aortic events.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39038201
doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM