Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 study.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 19 08 2022
accepted: 21 07 2023
medline: 26 7 2024
pubmed: 26 7 2024
entrez: 25 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) levels correlate with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are often co-expressed. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In a subgroup analysis of patients with advanced UC participating in a phase I/II study, epacadostat-pembrolizumab treatment produced an objective response rate (ORR) of 35%. ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 was a double-blinded, randomized phase III study of adults with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced UC with recurrence or progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomized to epacadostat 100 mg twice daily (BID) plus pembrolizumab or placebo plus pembrolizumab until completion of 35 pembrolizumab infusions, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Target enrollment was 648 patients; enrollment was halted early based on efficacy results from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study in metastatic melanoma. Forty-two patients were randomized to each treatment arm. Median duration of follow-up was 62 days in each arm. The investigator-assessed ORR (unconfirmed) was 26.2% (95% CI 16.35-48.11) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 11.9% (95% CI 4.67-29.50) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Two complete responses were reported, both in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Circulating kynurenine levels increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and numerically decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. The safety profile of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab was similar to that of pembrolizumab monotherapy, although a numerically greater proportion of patients in the combination vs. control arm experienced treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (16.7% vs. 7.3%). One patient in each arm died due to cardiovascular events, which were not deemed drug-related. No new safety concerns were identified for either agent. Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity and was generally tolerable as second-line treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/progressive metastatic UC. Epacadostat 100 mg BID, when administered with pembrolizumab, did not normalize circulating kynurenine in most patients. Further study of combined IDO1/PD-L1 inhibition in this patient population, particularly with epacadostat doses that result in durable normalization of circulating kynurenine, may be warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03374488. Registered 12/15/2017.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) levels correlate with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are often co-expressed. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In a subgroup analysis of patients with advanced UC participating in a phase I/II study, epacadostat-pembrolizumab treatment produced an objective response rate (ORR) of 35%.
METHODS METHODS
ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 was a double-blinded, randomized phase III study of adults with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced UC with recurrence or progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomized to epacadostat 100 mg twice daily (BID) plus pembrolizumab or placebo plus pembrolizumab until completion of 35 pembrolizumab infusions, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.
RESULTS RESULTS
Target enrollment was 648 patients; enrollment was halted early based on efficacy results from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study in metastatic melanoma. Forty-two patients were randomized to each treatment arm. Median duration of follow-up was 62 days in each arm. The investigator-assessed ORR (unconfirmed) was 26.2% (95% CI 16.35-48.11) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 11.9% (95% CI 4.67-29.50) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Two complete responses were reported, both in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Circulating kynurenine levels increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and numerically decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. The safety profile of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab was similar to that of pembrolizumab monotherapy, although a numerically greater proportion of patients in the combination vs. control arm experienced treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (16.7% vs. 7.3%). One patient in each arm died due to cardiovascular events, which were not deemed drug-related. No new safety concerns were identified for either agent.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity and was generally tolerable as second-line treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/progressive metastatic UC. Epacadostat 100 mg BID, when administered with pembrolizumab, did not normalize circulating kynurenine in most patients. Further study of combined IDO1/PD-L1 inhibition in this patient population, particularly with epacadostat doses that result in durable normalization of circulating kynurenine, may be warranted.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03374488. Registered 12/15/2017.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39054485
doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11213-6
pii: 10.1186/s12885-023-11213-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
pembrolizumab DPT0O3T46P
epacadostat 71596A9R13
Sulfonamides 0
Oximes 0
Indoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-Dioxygenase 0
IDO1 protein, human 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03374488']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial, Phase III Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1256

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Globocan. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Fact Sheets: Bladder. 2018. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/30-Bladder-fact-sheet.pdf . Accessed 21 July 2020.
Galsky MD, Balar AV, Black PC, Campell MT, Dykstra GS, Grivas P, et al. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of urothelial cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(7):e002552.
Bellmunt J, Orsola A, Leow JJ, Wiegel T, De Santis M, Horwich A. Bladder cancer: ESMO practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(Suppl 3):iii408.
Lotan Y, Meng X. Critical treatment choices for patients with platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):113.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30661-8
Dietrich B, Siefker-Radtke AO, Srinivas S, Yu EY. Systemic therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma: current standards and treatment considerations. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018;38:342–53.
doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201193 pubmed: 30231356
Office for National Statistics. Dataset: cancer survival in England - adults diagnosed. Released August 12, 2019. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/datasets/cancersurvivalratescancersurvivalinenglandadultsdiagnosed . Accessed  21 July 2020.
American Cancer Society. Survival rates for bladder cancer. Last revised: January 30, 2019. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/bladder-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html . Accessed 21 July 2020.
Cancer Research UK. Bladder cancer. Last reviewed: June 28, 2019. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/bladder-cancer/survival . Accessed  21 July 2020.
ESMO Guidelines Committee. eUpdate – bladder cancer treatment recommendations. 2019. https://www.esmo.org/guidelines/genitourinary-cancers/bladder-cancer/eUpdate-Bladder-Cancer-Treatment-Recommendations . Accessed  21 July 2020.
Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, Caserta C, Valderrama BP, Gurney H, et al. Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(13):1218–30.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002788 pubmed: 32945632
Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ, Fradet Y, Lee J-L, Fong L, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(11):1015–26.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613683 pubmed: 28212060 pmcid: 5635424
Powles T, Durán I, van der Heijden MS, Loriot Y, Vogelzang NJ, De Giorgi U, et al. Atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor211): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10122):748–57.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33297-X pubmed: 29268948
Sharma P, Retz M, Siefker-Radtke A, Baron A, Necchi A, Bedke J, et al. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):312–22.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30065-7 pubmed: 28131785
Fradet Y, Bellmunt J, Vaughn DJ, Lee JL, Fong L, Vogelzang NJ, et al. Randomized phase III KEYNOTE-045 trial of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine in recurrent advanced urothelial cancer: results of >2 years of follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(6):970–6.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz127 pubmed: 31050707 pmcid: 6594457
Necchi A, Fradet Y, Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Lee J, Fong L, et al. Three-year follow-up from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial: pembrolizumab (pembro) versus investigator’s choice (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine) in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer (UC). Ann Oncol. 2019;30(Suppl 5):v356-402.
Loriot Y, Balar AV, Petrylak DP, Tagawa ST, Rezazadeh A, Fléchon A, et al. TROPHY-U-01 cohort 1 final results: a phase II study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) that has progressed after platinum (PLT) and checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). Ann Oncol. 2020;31(Suppl_4):S1142-215.
O’Donnell PO, Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE, Petrylak DP, Balar AV, McGregor BA, et al. EV-201: Long-term results of enfortumab vedotin monotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer previously treated with platinum and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(Suppl_4):S550.
Quezada SA, Peggs KS. Exploiting CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 to reactivate the host immune response against cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(8):1560–5.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.117 pubmed: 23511566 pmcid: 3668483
Komiya T, Huang CH. Updates in the clinical development of epacadostat and other indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 inhibitors (IDO1) for human cancers. Front Oncol. 2018;8:423.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00423 pubmed: 30338242 pmcid: 6180183
Tsai YS, Jou YC, Tsai HT, Cheong IS, Tzai TS. Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 expression predicts poorer survival and up-regulates ZEB2 expression in human early stage bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(11):810.e17-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.05.005 pubmed: 31253481
Taylor MW, Feng GS. Relationship between interferon-gamma, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, and tryptophan catabolism. FASEB J. 1991;5(11):2516–22.
doi: 10.1096/fasebj.5.11.1907934 pubmed: 1907934
Mellor AL, Munn DH. IDO expression by dendritic cells: tolerance and tryptophan catabolism. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(10):762–74.
doi: 10.1038/nri1457 pubmed: 15459668
Holmgaard RB, Zamarin D, Munn DH, Wolchok JD, Allison JP. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a critical resistance mechanism in antitumor T cell immunotherapy targeting CTLA-4. J Exp Med. 2013;210(7):1389–402.
doi: 10.1084/jem.20130066 pubmed: 23752227 pmcid: 3698523
Takada K, Kohashi K, Shimokawa M, Haro A, Osoegawa A, Tagawa T, et al. Co-expression of IDO1 and PD-L1 in lung squamous cell carcinoma: potential targets of novel combination therapy. Lung Cancer. 2019;128:26–32.
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.12.008 pubmed: 30642449
Xu-Monette ZY, Xiao M, Au Q, Padmanabhan R, Xu B, Hoe N, et al. Immune profiling and quantitative analysis decipher the clinical role of immune-checkpoint expression in the tumor immune microenvironment of DLBCL. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(4):644–57.
doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0439 pubmed: 30745366
Rosenbaum MW, Gigliotti BJ, Pai SI, Parangi S, Wachtel H, Mino-Kenudson M, et al. PD-L1 and IDO1 are expressed in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Pathol. 2018;29(1):59–67.
doi: 10.1007/s12022-018-9514-y pubmed: 29372535 pmcid: 6500591
Spranger S, Spaapen RM, Zha Y, Williams J, Meng Y, Ha TT, et al. Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and T(regs) in the melanoma tumor microenvironment is driven by CD8(+) T cells. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(200):200ra116.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006504 pubmed: 23986400 pmcid: 4136707
Spranger S, Koblish HK, Horton B, Scherle PA, Newton R, Gajewski TF. Mechanism of tumor rejection with doublets of CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, or IDO blockade involves restored IL-2 production and proliferation of CD8(+) T cells directly within the tumor microenvironment. J Immunother Cancer. 2014;2:3.
doi: 10.1186/2051-1426-2-3 pubmed: 24829760 pmcid: 4019906
Beatty GL, O’Dwyer PJ, Clark J, Shi JG, Bowman KJ, Scherle PA, et al. First-in-human phase I study of the oral inhibitor of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 epacadostat (incb024360) in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(13):3269–76.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2272 pubmed: 28053021 pmcid: 5496788
Smith DC, Gajewski T, Hamid O, Wasser JS, Olszanski AJ, Patel SP, et al. Epcadostat plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: preliminary phase I/II results of ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl 15):4503.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.4503
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 pubmed: 19097774
Bellmunt J, Choueiri TK, Fougeray R, Schutz FAB, Salhi Y, Winquest E, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1850–5.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4599 pubmed: 20231682
Long GV, Dummer R, Hamid O, Gajewski TF, Caglevic C, Dalle S, et al. Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(8):1083–97.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30274-8 pubmed: 31221619
Necchi A, Van der Heijden MS, Trukhin D, Peer A, Gurney H, et al. Pembrolizumab plus either epacadostator placebo for cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma: results from the ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 study. BMC Cancer. In press.
Smith M, Newton R, Owens S, Gong X, Tian C, Malesk J, Leopold L. Retrospective pooled analysis of epacadostat clinical studies identifies doses required for maximal pharmacodynamic effect in anti-PD-1 combination studies. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8 Suppl 3: Abstract 28.

Auteurs

Irfan Cicin (I)

Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University, 22030, Edirne, Turkey. irfancicin@trakya.edu.tr.

Elizabeth R Plimack (ER)

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Howard Gurney (H)

Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Raya Leibowitz (R)

Oncology Institute and Cancer Research Centre, Sheba Medical Centre Hospital, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Boris Y Alekseev (BY)

PA Hertsen Moscow Cancer Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.

Francis X Parnis (FX)

Adelaide University and Adelaide Cancer Centre, Kurralta Park, SA, Australia.

Avivit Peer (A)

Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel.

Andrea Necchi (A)

Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Joaquim Bellmunt (J)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and PSMAR-IMIM Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Hiroyuki Nishiyama (H)

University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Jason Clark (J)

Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.

Mihaela Munteanu (M)

Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.

Ritesh Kataria (R)

Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Calvin Jia (C)

Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Thomas Powles (T)

Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trusts, Barts Cancer Institute, and Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Cora N Sternberg (CN)

Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH