Post sterilization of intraoral scan body and the effect it has on the axes and distances between three adjacent implants: in-vitro study.
Autoclave
CAD-CAM
Dental implants
Implant axis
Intraoral scan body
Oral rehabilitation
Primescan
Scan abutment
Sterilization
Titanium
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
14
02
2024
accepted:
24
07
2024
medline:
2
8
2024
pubmed:
2
8
2024
entrez:
1
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this pilot in-vitro study was to assess the effect of sterilization on the intra-implant axis, inter-implant axis, intra-implant distance and inter-implant distance of three implants in a straight line by using laboratory scanner (LBS) versus intra-oral scanner (IOS) with intra-oral scan bodies (ISB). A printed 3D model with three internal hex analogs in the positions 15#,16#,17# was used. Zirkonzhan (ZZ) intra-oral scan body (ISB), two-piece titanium was used. The ZZ ISBs were scanned by 7 Series dental wings (LBS) and 30 times by Primescan (IOS) pre sterilization and 30 times post sterilization. For each scan (pre and post) stereolithography (STL) file was created and a comparison between all the scans pre sterilization and post sterilization were superimposed on the laboratory scan by using a 3D analyzing software. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test performed followed by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. (p < 0.05) Results: Post sterilization of the ZZ ISB, the mean errors were significantly increased for the inter-implant distances (p < 0.0005), intra-implant distances 1,2,3 (p < 0.0005), intra-implant axis 1,3 (p < 0.0005) and inter-implant axes 13,23 (p < 0.05). In contrast, the mean errors for intra-implant axis 2 (p < 0.0005) and inter-implant axis 12 (p < 0.0005) were significantly reduced. ZZ ISB showed changes in all four parameters after sterilization. The middle ISB had the largest changes in mean error regarding all four parameters. Sterilization process may affect the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the ZZ ISB after three cycles. There is a lack in the literature in this field and there is a need for further studies to explore the effect of sterilization (multiple cycles) on different ISBs and for creating an approved guidelines regarding the amount of sterilization for each ISB in the industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this pilot in-vitro study was to assess the effect of sterilization on the intra-implant axis, inter-implant axis, intra-implant distance and inter-implant distance of three implants in a straight line by using laboratory scanner (LBS) versus intra-oral scanner (IOS) with intra-oral scan bodies (ISB).
METHODS
METHODS
A printed 3D model with three internal hex analogs in the positions 15#,16#,17# was used. Zirkonzhan (ZZ) intra-oral scan body (ISB), two-piece titanium was used. The ZZ ISBs were scanned by 7 Series dental wings (LBS) and 30 times by Primescan (IOS) pre sterilization and 30 times post sterilization. For each scan (pre and post) stereolithography (STL) file was created and a comparison between all the scans pre sterilization and post sterilization were superimposed on the laboratory scan by using a 3D analyzing software. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test performed followed by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. (p < 0.05) Results: Post sterilization of the ZZ ISB, the mean errors were significantly increased for the inter-implant distances (p < 0.0005), intra-implant distances 1,2,3 (p < 0.0005), intra-implant axis 1,3 (p < 0.0005) and inter-implant axes 13,23 (p < 0.05). In contrast, the mean errors for intra-implant axis 2 (p < 0.0005) and inter-implant axis 12 (p < 0.0005) were significantly reduced.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
ZZ ISB showed changes in all four parameters after sterilization. The middle ISB had the largest changes in mean error regarding all four parameters. Sterilization process may affect the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the ZZ ISB after three cycles. There is a lack in the literature in this field and there is a need for further studies to explore the effect of sterilization (multiple cycles) on different ISBs and for creating an approved guidelines regarding the amount of sterilization for each ISB in the industry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39090634
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04664-1
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04664-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
870Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Rosenstiel R, Land SF. M.F. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics; Elsevier Health Sciences. USA: St. Louis, MO; 2015.
Anadioti E, Lee C, Schweitzer A. Fit of CAD/CAM tooth-supported single crowns and fixed Dental Prostheses. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2017;4:142–50.
doi: 10.1007/s40496-017-0139-x
Allen KL, Schenkel AB, Estafan D. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system. Gen Dent. 2004;52:234–5.
pubmed: 15206254
Culp L, Wong NY, Misch CE. Digital Technology in Implant Dentistry. Dental Implant prosthetics. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Elsevier Mosby; 2015. pp. 700–23.
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-07845-0.00027-0
Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Lerner H, Rutkunas V, Mangano C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):263.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01254-9
pubmed: 32962680
pmcid: 7509929
Magne P, Stanley K, Schlichting LH. Modeling of ultrathin occlusal veneers. Dent Mater. 2012;28:777–82.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.002
pubmed: 22575740
Fluegge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. A Novel Method to Evaluate Precision of Optical Implant impressions with Commercial scan Bodies-An Experimental Approach. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:34–41.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12362
pubmed: 26466158
Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(3):343–52.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029
pubmed: 29627211
Skirbutis G, Dzingute A, Masiliunaite V, Sulcaite G, Zilinskas J. PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics. A review. Stomatologija. 2018;20:54–8.
pubmed: 30531169
Kumar A, Yap WT, Foo SL, Lee TK. Effects of sterilization cycles on PEEK for medical device application. Bioeng (Basel). 2018;5(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5010018 . PMID: 29466289; PMCID: PMC5874884.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering5010018
Tan JZH, Tan MY, See TYL, Wong KY, Tan KBC. Three-dimensional positional accuracy of intraoral and laboratory implant scan bodies. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;128:735–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.057
pubmed: 33836856
Kim J, Son K, Lee KB. Displacement of scan body during screw tightening: a comparative in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(5):307–15. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.307 .
doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.307
pubmed: 33149852
pmcid: 7604234
Török G, Gombocz P, Bognár E, Nagy P, Dinya E, Kispélyi B, Hermann P. Effects of disinfection and sterilization on the dimensional changes and mechanical properties of 3D printed surgical guides for implant therapy–pilot study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1–12.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1005-0
Kotsakis GA, Black R, Kum J, Berbel L, Sadr A, Karoussis I, Daubert D. Effect of implant cleaning on titanium particle dissolution and cytocompatibility. J Periodontol. 2021;92(4):580–91.
doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0186
pubmed: 32846000
Burkhardt F, Pitta J, Fehmer V, Mojon P, Sailer I. Retention forces of monolithic CAD/CAM crowns adhesively cemented to Titanium Base Abutments—Effect of Saliva Contamination followed by cleaning of the Titanium Bond Surface. Materials. 2021;14(12):3375.
doi: 10.3390/ma14123375
pubmed: 34207110
pmcid: 8234922
Oh S, Brammer KS, Moon KS, Bae JM, Jin S. Influence of sterilization methods on cell behavior and functionality of osteoblasts cultured on TiO2 nanotubes. Mater Sci Engineering: C. 2011;31(5):873–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2011.02.004
Diker E, Terzioglu H, Gouveia DNM, Donmez MB, Seidt J, Yilmaz B. Effect of material type, torque value, and sterilization on linear displacements of a scan body: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023;25(2):419–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13187 . Epub 2023 Feb 10. PMID: 36762614.
doi: 10.1111/cid.13187
pubmed: 36762614
Shely A, Lugassy D, Rosner O, Zanziper E, Nissan J, Rachmiel S, Khoury Y, Ben-Izhack G. The Influence of Laboratory Scanner versus intra-oral scanner on determining axes and distances between three implants in a straight line by using two different Intraoral scan bodies: a pilot in Vitro Study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(20):6644. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206644 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm12206644
pubmed: 37892783
pmcid: 10607023
Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr., Seidt J, Johnston WM. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:96–104.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003
pubmed: 31040026
Iturrate M, Eguiraun H, Solaberrieta E. Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part—An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:1250–8.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13549
pubmed: 31610069
Kato T, Yasunami N, Furuhashi A, Sanda K, Ayukawa Y. Effects of Autoclave Sterilization and multiple use on Implant Scanbody Deformation in Vitro. Mater (Basel). 2022;15(21):7717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217717 . PMID: 36363311; PMCID: PMC9655283.
doi: 10.3390/ma15217717
Revilla-León M, Lanis A, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Gallucci GO. Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy. J Prosthodont. 2023 Aug 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13749 . Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37586762.
Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:186–94.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010
pubmed: 24210732
Buzayan MM, Yunus NB. Passive Fit in Screw retained multi-unit Implant Prosthesis understanding and achieving: a review of the literature. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14:16–23.
doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0343-x
pubmed: 24604993
Çakmak G, Yilmaz H, Treviño Santos A, Kökat AM, Yilmaz B. Effect of scanner type and scan body location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant scans: an in Vitro Study. J Prosthodont. 2022;31:419–26.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.13418
pubmed: 34453466