Evaluation of the BOPPPS model on otolaryngologic education for five-year undergraduates.
BOPPPS model
Competency-based education
Five-year undergraduates
Otolaryngology education
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Aug 2024
09 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
11
02
2024
accepted:
06
08
2024
medline:
10
8
2024
pubmed:
10
8
2024
entrez:
9
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the BOPPPS model (bridge-in, learning objective, pre-test, participatory learning, post-test, and summary) in otolaryngology education for five-year undergraduate students. A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 167 five-year undergraduate students from Anhui Medical University, who were allocated to an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received instruction using the BOPPPS model, while the control group underwent traditional teaching methods. The evaluation of the teaching effectiveness was performed through an anonymous questionnaire based on the course evaluation questionnaire. Students' perspectives and self-evaluations were quantified using a five-point Likert scale. Furthermore, students' comprehension of the course content was measured through a comprehensive final examination at the end of the semester. Students in the experimental group reported significantly higher scores in various competencies compared to the control group: planning work (4.27 ± 0.676 vs. 4.03 ± 0.581, P < 0.05), problem-solving skills (4.31 ± 0.624 vs. 4.03 ± 0.559, P < 0.01), teamwork abilities (4.19 ± 0.704 vs. 3.87 ± 0.758, P < 0.05), and analytical skills (4.31 ± 0.719 vs. 4.05 ± 0.622, P < 0.05). They also reported higher motivation for learning (4.48 ± 0.618 vs. 4.09 ± 0.582, P < 0.01). Additionally, students in the experimental group felt more confident tackling unfamiliar problems (4.21 ± 0.743 vs. 3.95 ± 0.636, P < 0.05), had a clearer understanding of teachers' expectations (4.31 ± 0.552 vs. 4.08 ± 0.555, P < 0.05), and perceived more effort from teachers to understand their difficulties (4.42 ± 0.577 vs. 4.13 ± 0.59, P < 0.01). They emphasized comprehension over memorization (3.65 ± 1.176 vs. 3.18 ± 1.065, P < 0.05) and received more helpful feedback (4.40 ± 0.574 vs. 4.08 ± 0.585, P < 0.01). Lecturers were rated better at explaining concepts (4.42 ± 0.539 vs. 4.08 ± 0.619, P < 0.01) and making subjects interesting (4.50 ± 0.546 vs. 4.08 ± 0.632, P < 0.01). Overall, the experimental group expressed higher course satisfaction (4.56 ± 0.542 vs. 4.34 ± 0.641, P < 0.05). In terms of examination performance, the experimental group scored higher on the final examination (87.7 ± 6.7 vs. 84.0 ± 7.7, P < 0.01) and in noun-interpretation (27.0 ± 1.6 vs. 26.1 ± 2.4, P < 0.01). The BOPPPS model emerged as an effective and innovative teaching method, particularly in enhancing students' competencies in otolaryngology education. Based on the findings of this study, educators and institutions were encouraged to consider incorporating the BOPPPS model into their curricula to enhance the learning experiences and outcomes of students.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the BOPPPS model (bridge-in, learning objective, pre-test, participatory learning, post-test, and summary) in otolaryngology education for five-year undergraduate students.
METHODS
METHODS
A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 167 five-year undergraduate students from Anhui Medical University, who were allocated to an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received instruction using the BOPPPS model, while the control group underwent traditional teaching methods. The evaluation of the teaching effectiveness was performed through an anonymous questionnaire based on the course evaluation questionnaire. Students' perspectives and self-evaluations were quantified using a five-point Likert scale. Furthermore, students' comprehension of the course content was measured through a comprehensive final examination at the end of the semester.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Students in the experimental group reported significantly higher scores in various competencies compared to the control group: planning work (4.27 ± 0.676 vs. 4.03 ± 0.581, P < 0.05), problem-solving skills (4.31 ± 0.624 vs. 4.03 ± 0.559, P < 0.01), teamwork abilities (4.19 ± 0.704 vs. 3.87 ± 0.758, P < 0.05), and analytical skills (4.31 ± 0.719 vs. 4.05 ± 0.622, P < 0.05). They also reported higher motivation for learning (4.48 ± 0.618 vs. 4.09 ± 0.582, P < 0.01). Additionally, students in the experimental group felt more confident tackling unfamiliar problems (4.21 ± 0.743 vs. 3.95 ± 0.636, P < 0.05), had a clearer understanding of teachers' expectations (4.31 ± 0.552 vs. 4.08 ± 0.555, P < 0.05), and perceived more effort from teachers to understand their difficulties (4.42 ± 0.577 vs. 4.13 ± 0.59, P < 0.01). They emphasized comprehension over memorization (3.65 ± 1.176 vs. 3.18 ± 1.065, P < 0.05) and received more helpful feedback (4.40 ± 0.574 vs. 4.08 ± 0.585, P < 0.01). Lecturers were rated better at explaining concepts (4.42 ± 0.539 vs. 4.08 ± 0.619, P < 0.01) and making subjects interesting (4.50 ± 0.546 vs. 4.08 ± 0.632, P < 0.01). Overall, the experimental group expressed higher course satisfaction (4.56 ± 0.542 vs. 4.34 ± 0.641, P < 0.05). In terms of examination performance, the experimental group scored higher on the final examination (87.7 ± 6.7 vs. 84.0 ± 7.7, P < 0.01) and in noun-interpretation (27.0 ± 1.6 vs. 26.1 ± 2.4, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The BOPPPS model emerged as an effective and innovative teaching method, particularly in enhancing students' competencies in otolaryngology education. Based on the findings of this study, educators and institutions were encouraged to consider incorporating the BOPPPS model into their curricula to enhance the learning experiences and outcomes of students.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39123159
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05868-3
pii: 10.1186/s12909-024-05868-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
860Subventions
Organisme : the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Provincial Education Department
ID : KJ2021A0315
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Steven RA, McAleer S, Jones SE, Lloyd SK, Spielmann PM, Eynon-Lewis N, Mires GJ. Defining performance levels in undergraduate otolaryngology education. J Laryngol Otol. 2022;136(1):17–23.
doi: 10.1017/S0022215121003893
Patel B, Saeed SR, Smith S. The provision of ENT teaching in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a review and recommendations. J Laryngol Otol. 2021;135(7):610–5.
doi: 10.1017/S0022215121001389
Mayer AW, Smith KA, Carrie S. A survey of ENT undergraduate teaching in the UK. J Laryngol Otol. 2020;134(6):553–7.
doi: 10.1017/S0022215120000936
Fung K. Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery in undergraduate medical education: advances and innovations. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(Suppl 2):S1–14.
Ma X, Zeng D, Wang J, Xu K, Li L. Effectiveness of bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary teaching strategy in Chinese medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:975229.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.975229
Hu K, Ma RJ, Ma C, Zheng QK, Sun ZG. Comparison of the BOPPPS model and traditional instructional approaches in thoracic surgery education. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):447.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03526-0
Al-Hazimi A, Zaini R, Al-Hyiani A, Hassan N, Gunaid A, Ponnamperuma G, Karunathilake I, Roff S, McAleer S, Davis M. Educational environment in traditional and innovative medical schools: a study in four undergraduate medical schools. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004;17(2):192–203.
doi: 10.1080/13576280410001711003
Nandi PL, Chan JN, Chan CP, Chan P, Chan LP. Undergraduate medical education: comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching. Hong Kong Med J. 2000;6(3):301–6.
Oyewumi M, Isaac K, Schreiber M, Campisi P. Undergraduate otolaryngology education at the University of Toronto: a review using a curriculum mapping system. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;41(1):71–5.
Ferguson GR, Bacila IA, Swamy M. Does current provision of undergraduate education prepare UK medical students in ENT? A systematic literature review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e010054.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010054
Mace AD, Narula AA. Survey of current undergraduate otolaryngology training in the United Kingdom. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118(3):217–20.
doi: 10.1258/002221504322928008
Campisi P, Asaria J, Brown D. Undergraduate otolaryngology education in Canadian medical schools. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(11):1941–50.
doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31818208e7
Pattison P, Russell D. Instructional skills workshop handbook. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Centre for Teaching and Academic Growth; 2006.
Chen L, Tang XJ, Chen XK, Ke N, Liu Q. Effect of the BOPPPS model combined with case-based learning versus lecture-based learning on ophthalmology education for five-year paediatric undergraduates in Southwest China. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):437.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03514-4
Li Y, Li X, Liu Y, Li Y. Application effect of BOPPPS teaching model on fundamentals of nursing education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1319711.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1319711
Li Z, Cai X, Zhou K, Qin J, Zhang J, Yang Q, Yan F. Effects of BOPPPS combined with TBL in surgical nursing for nursing undergraduates: a mixed-method study. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):133.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01281-1
Pan Y. A review on the application and development of the BOPPPS Model in Chinese Colleges and universities. Int J Educational Curriculum Manage Res. 2023;4(2):1–8.
Xu Z, Che X, Yang X, Wang X. Application of the hybrid BOPPPS teaching model in clinical internships in gynecology. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):465.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04455-2
Mennin S, Martinez-Burrola N. The cost of problem‐based vs traditional medical education. Med Educ. 1986;20(3):187–94.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01166.x
Zhang L. Teaching design and practice of intensive reading course based on BOPPPS. J Lang Teach Res. 2020;11(3):503–8.
doi: 10.17507/jltr.1103.21
Broomfield D, Bligh J. An evaluation of the ‘short form’ course experience questionnaire with medical students. Med Educ. 1998;32(4):367–9.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00232.x
Lucey CR. Medical Education: part of the Problem and Part of the solution. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(17):1639–43.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9074
Norman G. Medical education: past, present and future. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1(1):6–14.
doi: 10.1007/S40037-012-0002-7
McIntosh C, Patel KR, Lekakis G, Wong BJF. Emerging trends in rhinoplasty education: accelerated adoption of digital tools and virtual learning platforms. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;30(4):226–9.
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000814
Gantz BJ. Evolution of Otology and Neurotology Education in the United States. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(4S Suppl 1):S64–8.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001758
Ishman SL, Stewart CM, Senser E, Stewart RW, Stanley J, Stierer KD, Benke JR, Kern DE. Qualitative synthesis and systematic review of otolaryngology in undergraduate medical education. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(12):2695–708.
doi: 10.1002/lary.25350
Comer BT, Gupta N, Mowry SE, Malekzadeh S. Otolaryngology Education in the setting of COVID-19: current and future implications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(1):70–4.
doi: 10.1177/0194599820923621
Henri M, Johnson MD, Nepal B. A review of competency-based learning: tools, assessments, and recommendations. J Engin Educ. 2017;106(4):607–38.
doi: 10.1002/jee.20180
Wen H, Xu W, Chen F, Jiang X, Zhang R, Zeng J, Peng L, Chen Y. Application of the BOPPPS-CBL model in electrocardiogram teaching for nursing students: a randomized comparison. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):987.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04983-x
Ma X, Ma X, Li L, Luo X, Zhang H, Liu Y. Effect of blended learning with BOPPPS model on Chinese student outcomes and perceptions in an introduction course of health services management. Adv Physiol Educ. 2021;45(2):409–17.
doi: 10.1152/advan.00180.2020
Wagner N, Fahim C, Dunn K, Reid D, Sonnadara RR. Otolaryngology residency education: a scoping review on the shift towards competency-based medical education. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(3):564–72.
doi: 10.1111/coa.12772
Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, Harris P, Glasgow NJ, Campbell C, Dath D. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638–45.
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190
Chen JX, Thorne MC, Galaiya D, Campisi P, Gray ST. Competency-based medical education in the United States: what the otolaryngologist needs to know. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023;8(4):827–31.
doi: 10.1002/lio2.1095
Wu C, He X, Jiang H. Advanced and effective teaching design based on BOPPPS model. Int J Continuing Eng Educ Life Long Learn. 2022;32(5):650–61.
doi: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2022.125731
Li P, Lan X, Ren L, Xie X, Xie H, Liu S. Research and practice of the BOPPPS teaching model based on the OBE concept in clinical basic laboratory experiment teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):882.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04822-z
Jamil Z, Naseem A, Rashwan E, Khalid S. Blended learning: call of the day for medical education in the global South. SOTL South. 2019;3(1):57–76.
doi: 10.36615/sotls.v3i1.73
Lin GSS, Tan W-W, Tan H-J, Khoo C-W, Afrashtehfar KI. Innovative pedagogical strategies in health professions education: active learning in dental materials science. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):2041.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032041