Surgeon perceptions of personality as an influencing factor on anastomotic decision-making: A qualitative analysis.


Journal

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
ISSN: 1463-1318
Titre abrégé: Colorectal Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883611

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Historique:
revised: 27 05 2024
received: 11 01 2024
accepted: 01 06 2024
medline: 20 8 2024
pubmed: 20 8 2024
entrez: 20 8 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Surgeon personality is a factor influencing rectal anastomotic decision-making. However, it is unclear how or why this may be the case, or what aspects of personality are involved. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual personality may influence variation in anastomotic decision-making. Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK-based colorectal surgeons to participate, with individual interviews used for data collection. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated (i.e. data sufficiency). Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six-step framework. Seventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes relating to personality and decision-making were identified: (1) surgeon development and training and (2) patient-surgeon interactions, each with relevant subthemes. Surgeons described how their personality may influence patients' postoperative outcomes (e.g. decision-making, team working and communication) and potential mechanisms for how their personality may influence operative risk-taking. Following anastomotic leakage, surgeons described a disproportionate sense of guilt and responsibility. There appears to be a significant transition in responsibility from trainee to newly appointed consultant, which may be part of the 'hidden curriculum' of surgical training. Colorectal surgeons have described their perceptions of how personality traits may impact variation in decision-making and patient outcomes for the first time. Early career surgeons felt ill-prepared for the level of guilt experienced when managing complications. Surgeons appear open to personality assessment if this was through an educational lens, with the aim of improving decision-making following complications and overall performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39162024
doi: 10.1111/codi.17078
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1608-1616

Subventions

Organisme : Bowel Research UK
Organisme : Ileostomy and Internal Pouch Association

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Références

Marshall DC , Webb TE , Hall RA , Salciccioli JD , Ali R , Maruthappu M . Trends in UK regional cancer mortality 1991–2007. Br J Cancer. 2016;114(3):340–347.
Conibear J , Nossiter J , Foster C , West D , Cromwell D , Navani N . The National Lung Cancer Audit: the impact of COVID‐19. Clin Oncol. 2022;34(11):701–707.
Morris E , Quirke P , Thomas JD , Fairley L , Cottier B , Forman D . Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? Gut. 2008;57(12):1690–1697.
Pucher PH , Park MH , Cromwell DA , Crosby TC , Thomas B , Trudgill N , et al. Diagnosis and treatment for gastro‐oesophageal cancer in England and Wales: analysis of the National Oesophago‐Gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA) database 2012–2020. Br J Surg. 2023;110(6):701–709. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad065
National Bowel Cancer Audit. Annual Report. 2022. https://www.nboca.org.uk/reports/annual‐report‐2022/
Fenton HM , Taylor JC , Lodge JP , Toogood GJ , Finan PJ , Young AL , et al. Variation in the use of resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2019;270(5):892–898.
Manilich E , Vogel JD , Kiran RP , Church JM , Seyidova‐Khoshknabi D , Remzi FH . Key factors associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(1):64–71.
Marinello FG , Baguena G , Lucas E , Frasson M , Hervás D , Flor‐Lorente B , et al. Anastomotic leakage after colon cancer resection: does the individual surgeon matter? Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(6):562–569.
Ignatavicius P , Oberkofler CE , Chapman WC , DeMatteo RP , Clary BM , D'Angelica MI , et al. Choices of therapeutic strategies for colorectal liver metastases among expert liver surgeons: a throw of the dice? Ann Surg. 2020;272(5):715–722.
McCrae RR , Costa PT Jr . Empirical and theoretical status of the five‐factor model of personality traits. In: Boyle GJ , Matthews G , Saklofske DH , editors. The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 1. Personality theories and models. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008. p. 273–294. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462.n13
John OP , Srivastava S . The big‐five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Guilford, NY: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 103–138.
Siassi M , Weiss M , Hohenberger W , Lösel F , Matzel K . Personality rather than clinical variables determines quality of life after major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(4):662–668.
Sharma A , Sharp DM , Walker LG , Monson JR . Patient personality predicts postoperative stay after colorectal cancer resection. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(2):151–156.
Denollet J , Holmes RV , Vrints CJ , Conraads VM . Unfavorable outcome of heart transplantation in recipients with type D personality. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26(2):152–158.
Juhl AA , Damsgaard TE , O'Connor M , Christensen S , Zachariae R . Personality traits as predictors of quality of life and body image after breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(5):e1341.
Bellino S , Fenocchio M , Zizza M , Rocca G , Bogetti P , Bogetto F . Quality of life of patients who undergo breast reconstruction after mastectomy: effects of personality characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):10–17.
Lovejoy CA , Nashef SA . Surgeons' personalities and surgical outcomes. Bull Royal Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(6):259–263.
Moug SJ , Henderson N , Tiernan J , Bisset CN , Ferguson E , Harji D , et al. The colorectal surgeon's personality may influence the rectal anastomotic decision. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(11):970–980.
Bisset CN , Ferguson E , MacDermid E , Stein SL , Yassin N , Dames N , et al. Exploring variation in surgical practice: does surgeon personality influence anastomotic decision‐making? Br J Surg. 2022;109(11):1156–1163.
Bisset CN , Dames N , Oliphant R , Alasadi A , Anderson D , Parson S , et al. Exploring shared surgical decision‐making from the patient's perspective: is the personality of the surgeon important? Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(12):2214–2221.
Bromiley P , Curley SP . Individual differences in risk taking. In: Yates FJ , editor. Risk‐taking behavior. NY: John Wiley; 1992.
Weber EU , Blais AR . Risk‐attitude scale: Methodology and sample. 2002. https://cradpdf.drdc‐rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc21/p521121.pdf
Kahneman D , Tversky A . Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. LC Maclean & WT Ziemba eds. Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: part I; World Scientific Books from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 2013. p. 99–127.
Neily J , Mills PD , Paull DE , Mazzia LM , Turner JR , Hemphill RR , et al. Sharing lessons learned to prevent incorrect surgery. Am Surg. 2012;78(11):1276–1280.
MacDermid E , Young CJ , Moug SJ , Anderson RG , Shepherd HL . Heuristics and bias in rectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(8):1109–1115.
Mackay I , Clark DA , Nicholson J , Edmundson A , Steffens D , Solomon M . Risk taking propensity: nurse, surgeon and patient preferences for diverting ileostomy. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24(9):1073–1079.
MacDermid E , Young CJ , Young J , Solomon M . Decision‐making in rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(3):203–208.
Joseph ED , Zhang DC . Personality profile of risk‐takers. J Individ Differ. 2021;42:194–203.
Tong A , Sainsbury P , Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32‐item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
Backman R , Foy R , Michael BD , Defres S , Kneen R , Solomon T . The development of an intervention to promote adherence to national guidelines for suspected viral encephalitis. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1–2.
Atkins L , Francis J , Islam R , O'Connor D , Patey A , Ivers N , et al. A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):1–8.
Ryckman RM . Theories of personality. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning; 2012.
Etikan I , Musa SA , Alkassim RS . Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1–4.
Malterud K , Siersma VD , Guassora AD . Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
LaDonna KA , Artino AR Jr , Balmer DF . Beyond the guise of saturation: rigor and qualitative interview data. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(5):607–611.
Braun V , Clarke V . One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18:328–352.
Braun V , Clarke V . What can ‘thematic analysis’ offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being. 2014;9(1):26152.
Scheepers RA , Lombarts KM , Van Aken MA , Heineman MJ , Arah OA . Personality traits affect teaching performance of attending physicians: results of a multi‐center observational study. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98107.
O'Neill TA , Allen NJ . Personality and the prediction of team performance. Eur J Personal. 2011;25(1):31–42.
Cope J . Entrepreneurial learning from failure: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Bus Ventur. 2011;26(6):604–623.
Zhao H , Wibowo A . Entrepreneurship resilience: can psychological traits of entrepreneurial intention support overcoming entrepreneurial failure? Front Psychol. 2021;12:707803.
Omorede A . Managing crisis: a qualitative lens on the aftermath of entrepreneurial failure. Int Entrep Manag J. 2021;17(3):1441–1468.
Pinto A , Faiz O , Bicknell C , Vincent C . Surgical complications and their implications for surgeons' well‐being. J Br Surg. 2013;100(13):1748–1755.
Orlander JD , Barber TW , Fincke BG . The morbidity and mortality conference: the delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):1001–1006.
The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow. Mentorship Programme. 2023. https://rcpsg.ac.uk/college/membership/mentorship‐programme
Tornetta P , Bogdan Y . CORR® curriculum—orthopaedic education: mentorship in surgical training: can personality assessment help? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1125–1128.
Greenberg CC , Ghousseini HN , Quamme SR , Beasley HL , Wiegmann DA . Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):32–34.
Walle KA , Quamme SR , Leverson GE , Engler T , Dombrowski JC , Wiegmann DA , et al. Association of personality and thinking style with effective surgical coaching. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(6):480–485.
Bono JE , Judge TA . Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta‐analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(5):901–910.
Molleman E . Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: do faultlines affect team functioning? Group Decis Negot. 2005;14(3):173–193.
Butrus N , Witenberg RT . Some personality predictors of tolerance to human diversity: the roles of openness, agreeableness, and empathy. Austral Psychol. 2013;48(4):290–298.
Boyce LA , Jeffrey Jackson R , Neal LJ . Building successful leadership coaching relationships: examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program. J Manag Dev. 2010;29(10):914–931.
Pradarelli JC , Yule S , Smink DS . Performance coaching for practicing surgeons enhancing clinical performance, well‐being, and trainee experience. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(3):495–498.
Vitous CA , Ivatury SJ , Suwanabol PA . Value of qualitative research in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021;64(12):1444–1446.
Newman TH , Parry MG , Zakeri R , Pegna V , Nagle A , Bhatti F , et al. Gender diversity in UK surgical specialties: a national observational study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e055516.

Auteurs

Carly N Bisset (CN)

Department of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK.
School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Susan J Moug (SJ)

Department of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Golden Jubilee University National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Raymond Oliphant (R)

School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK.

Nicola Dames (N)

Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Patient Liaison Group, Glasgow, UK.

Jennifer Cleland (J)

Medical Education Research and Scholarship Unit, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH