Evaluating the tailored implementation of a multisite care navigation service for mental health in rural and remote Australia (The Bridging Study): protocol for a community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.
Humans
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Mental Health Services
/ organization & administration
Patient Navigation
/ organization & administration
Australia
Health Services Accessibility
/ organization & administration
Rural Population
Rural Health Services
/ organization & administration
SARS-CoV-2
Mental Disorders
/ therapy
Implementation Science
Queensland
Adaptation
Australia
Community engagement
EPIS framework
Hybrid effectiveness-implementation design
Implementation study
Mental health
Participatory methods
Rural and remote
Scaling-up
Journal
Implementation science : IS
ISSN: 1748-5908
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Sep 2024
04 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
17
07
2024
accepted:
18
08
2024
medline:
5
9
2024
pubmed:
5
9
2024
entrez:
5
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A dramatic decline in mental health of people worldwide in the early COVID-19 pandemic years has not recovered. In rural and remote Australia, access to appropriate and timely mental health services has been identified as a major barrier to people seeking help for mental ill-health. From 2020 to 2021 a care navigation model, Navicare, was co-designed with rural and remote communities in the Greater Whitsunday Region of Central Queensland in Australia. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework was used to design and guide multiple aspects of a multisite study, The Bridging Study, to evaluate the implementation of Navicare in Australia. A community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design will focus on the tailored implementation of Navicare at three new sites as well as monitoring implementation at an existing site established since 2021. Study outcomes assessed will include sustained access as the co-primary outcome (measured using access to Navicare mental health referral services) and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity, implementation cost, and sustainability. Data collection for the implementation evaluation will include service usage data, community consultations, interviews, and workshops; analysed using mixed methods and guided by EPIS and other implementation frameworks. Pre-post effectiveness and cost-consequence study components are embedded in the implementation and sustainment phases, with comparison to pre-implementation data and value assessed for each EPIS phase using hospital, service, and resource allocation data. A scaling up strategy will be co-developed using a national roundtable forum in the final year of the study. Qualitative exploration of other aspects of the study (e.g., mechanisms of action and stakeholder engagement) will be conducted. Our study will use tailoring to local sites and a community-engaged approach to drive implementation of a mental health care navigation service in rural and remote Australia, with expected benefits to mental healthcare access. This approach is consistent with policy recommendations nationally and internationally as building blocks for rural health including the World Health Organization Framework for Action on Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes. Prospectively registered on April 2, 2024, on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, no. ACTRN12624000382572. https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386665&isReview=true .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A dramatic decline in mental health of people worldwide in the early COVID-19 pandemic years has not recovered. In rural and remote Australia, access to appropriate and timely mental health services has been identified as a major barrier to people seeking help for mental ill-health. From 2020 to 2021 a care navigation model, Navicare, was co-designed with rural and remote communities in the Greater Whitsunday Region of Central Queensland in Australia. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework was used to design and guide multiple aspects of a multisite study, The Bridging Study, to evaluate the implementation of Navicare in Australia.
METHODS
METHODS
A community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design will focus on the tailored implementation of Navicare at three new sites as well as monitoring implementation at an existing site established since 2021. Study outcomes assessed will include sustained access as the co-primary outcome (measured using access to Navicare mental health referral services) and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity, implementation cost, and sustainability. Data collection for the implementation evaluation will include service usage data, community consultations, interviews, and workshops; analysed using mixed methods and guided by EPIS and other implementation frameworks. Pre-post effectiveness and cost-consequence study components are embedded in the implementation and sustainment phases, with comparison to pre-implementation data and value assessed for each EPIS phase using hospital, service, and resource allocation data. A scaling up strategy will be co-developed using a national roundtable forum in the final year of the study. Qualitative exploration of other aspects of the study (e.g., mechanisms of action and stakeholder engagement) will be conducted.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study will use tailoring to local sites and a community-engaged approach to drive implementation of a mental health care navigation service in rural and remote Australia, with expected benefits to mental healthcare access. This approach is consistent with policy recommendations nationally and internationally as building blocks for rural health including the World Health Organization Framework for Action on Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Prospectively registered on April 2, 2024, on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, no. ACTRN12624000382572. https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386665&isReview=true .
Identifiants
pubmed: 39232820
doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01391-7
pii: 10.1186/s13012-024-01391-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
62Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Sapien Labs. The Mental State of the World in 2023: A persepctive in Internet-Enabled Populations. 2024. https://mentalstateoftheworld.report/2023_read/ .
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australian Government. Australian Burden of Disease Study 2023. Canberra; 2023. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/burden-of-disease/australian-burden-of-disease-study-2023/contents/summary . Accessed 27 May 2024.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Canberra; 2023. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing/2020-2022 . Accessed 27 May 2024.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural & Remote Australians. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website; 2024. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/population-groups/rural-remote-australians/links-other-information#:~:text=The%20term%20'rural%20and%20remote,regional%2C%20Remote%20or%20Very%20remote . Accessed 27 May 2024.
Perkins D, Farmer J, Salvador-Carulla L, Dalton H, Luscombe G. The Orange Declaration on rural and remote mental health. Aust J Rural Health. 2019;27(5):374–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12560 .
doi: 10.1111/ajr.12560
pubmed: 31515882
Australian Mental Health Commission (AMHC). Submission to the accessibility and quality of mental health services in rural and remote Australia Senate Inquiry. 2018. https://www.nswmentalhealthcommission.com.au/report/accessibility-and-quality-mental-health-services-rural-and-remote-australia .
Petrie K, Baldwin P, Crawford J, Harvey SB. The voice of mental health practice in Australia: a mixed-method cross-sectional study of gaps and areas of need. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021;45(4):318–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13078 .
doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13078
pubmed: 33617137
Stanton MC, Ali SB, Team tSC. A typology of power in implementation: Building on the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework to advance mental health and HIV health equity. Implement Res Pract. 2022;3:26334895211064250. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895211064250 .
doi: 10.1177/26334895211064250
pubmed: 37091105
pmcid: 9978699
Wesley Medical Research & The Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation. Abell B, Fisher F, Tyack Z, McPhail S. Developing a new intervention for mental health services in the Bowen Basin (Phase 1): Full Project Report. Brisbane; 2020. https://www.aushsi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Bowen-Basin-Phase-1-Report_FINAL-with-ExSum-no-costs.pdf . Accessed 27 May 2024.
Gillam M, Leach M, Gonzalez-Chica D, Jones M, Muyambi K, Walsh S, et al. Availability and quality of publicly available health workforce data sources in Australia: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(e034400). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034400 .
Fitzpatrick SJ, Perkins D, Luland T, Brown D, Corvan E. The effect of context in rural mental health care: Understanding integrated services in a small town. Health Place. 2017;45:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.004
pubmed: 28288445
Anderson JE, Larke SC. The Sooke Navigator project: using community resources and research to improve local service for mental health and addictions. Ment Health Fam Med. 2009;6(1):21–8.
pubmed: 22477884
pmcid: 2777592
Corrigan PW, Pickett S, Batia K, Michaels PJ. Peer navigators and integrated care to address ethnic health disparities of people with serious mental illness. Soc Work Public Health. 2014;29(6):581–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2014.893854 .
doi: 10.1080/19371918.2014.893854
pubmed: 25144699
pmcid: 5371355
Harris SA, Eapen V, Kohlhoff J. Implementing a National Navigation Service for Perinatal and Infant Mental Health: Early Learnings from the ForWhen Model. Community Ment Health J. 2024;60(3):581–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-023-01211-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01211-0
pubmed: 37991577
Kangovi S, Mitra N, Norton L, Harte R, Zhao X, Carter T, et al. Effect of Community Health Worker Support on Clinical Outcomes of Low-Income Patients Across Primary Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1635–43. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4630 .
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4630
pubmed: 30422224
pmcid: 6469661
Aarons GA, Huriburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011;38(1):4–23.
doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7
pubmed: 21197565
Greater Whitsunday Region. State Development and Instrustructure, Queensland Government. 2023. Available from: https://www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au/regions/queenslands-regions/greater-whitsunday .
Curran GM, Landes SJ, McBain SA, Pyne JM, Smith JD, Fernandez ME, et al. Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies. Front Health Serv. 2022;2:1053496. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1053496 .
doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1053496
pubmed: 36925811
pmcid: 10012680
Hawkins NG, Sanson-Fisher RW, Shakeshaft A, D’Este C, Green LW. The multiple baseline design for evaluating population-based research. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(2):162–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.020 .
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.020
pubmed: 17673105
Holt CL, Chambers DA. Opportunities and challenges in conducting community-engaged dissemination/implementation research. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):389–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0520-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0520-2
pubmed: 28884305
pmcid: 5645293
Collins SE, Clifasefi SL, Stanton J, The Leap Advisory B, Straits KJE, Gil-Kashiwabara E, et al. Community-based participatory research (CBPR): Towards equitable involvement of community in psychology research. Am Psychol. 2018;73(7):884–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000167 .
doi: 10.1037/amp0000167
pubmed: 29355352
pmcid: 6054913
Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL, Henderson J, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90(2):311–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x
pubmed: 22709390
pmcid: 3460206
Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Rabin B, Aarons GA. Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6
pubmed: 30611302
pmcid: 6321673
Olakunde BO, Itanyi IU, Olawepo JO, Liu L, Bembir C, Idemili-Aronu N, et al. Comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for Accelerating Cervical Cancer Elimination through the integration of Screen-and-treat Services (ACCESS study): protocol for a cluster randomized hybrid type III trial in Nigeria. Implement Sci. 2024;19(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01349-9 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01349-9
pubmed: 38468266
pmcid: 10926605
Beeber L, Ledford A, Gasbarro M, Zeanah P, Knudtson M, Sprinkle S, et al. Developing a multicomponent implementation strategy for mental health interventions within the Nurse-Family Partnership: An application of the EPIS framework. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2022;54(4):445–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12755 .
doi: 10.1111/jnu.12755
pubmed: 34904787
Becan JE, Bartkowski JP, Knight DK, Wiley TRA, DiClemente R, Ducharme L, et al. A model for rigorously applying the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework in the design and measurement of a large scale collaborative multi-site study. Health Justice. 2018;6(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-018-0068-3 .
doi: 10.1186/s40352-018-0068-3
pubmed: 29654518
pmcid: 5899075
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
pubmed: 20957426
Proctor EK, Bunger AC, Lengnick-Hall R, Gerke DR, Martin JK, Phillips RJ, et al. Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2023;18(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z
pubmed: 37491242
pmcid: 10367273
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
Wiltsey Stirman S, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y
pubmed: 31171014
pmcid: 6554895
Miller CJ, Barnett ML, Baumann AA, Gutner CA, Wiltsey-Stirman S. The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3
pubmed: 33827716
pmcid: 8024675
WHO. Nine steps for developing a scaling-up strategy. France: World Health Organisation WHO; 2010. p. 41 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241500319 .
Gogovor A, Zomahoun HTV, Ben Charif A, Ekanmian G, Moher D, McLean RKD, et al. Informing the development of the SUCCEED reporting guideline for studies on the scaling of health interventions: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(7): e37079. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000037079 .
doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000037079
pubmed: 38363902
Palinkas LA, Mendon SJ, Hamilton AB. Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations. Annual Review of Public Health. 2019;Volume 40, 2019(40):423–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215 .
doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215
Fishman KN, Levitt AJ, Markoulakis R, Weingust S. Satisfaction with Mental Health Navigation Services: Piloting an Evaluation with a New Scale. Community Ment Health J. 2018;54(5):521–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0201-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0201-0
pubmed: 29147951
Luke DA, Calhoun A, Robichaux CB, Elliott MB, Moreland-Russell S. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: A New Instrument for Public Health Programs. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E12. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130184 .
doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130184
pubmed: 24456645
pmcid: 3900326
Yakovchenko V, Rogal SS, Goodrich DE, Lamorte C, Neely B, Merante M, et al. Getting to implementation: Adaptation of an implementation playbook. Front Public Health. 2023;10: 980958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.980958 .
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.980958
pubmed: 36684876
pmcid: 9853037
Chamberlain P, Brown CH, Saldana L. Observational measure of implementation progress in community based settings: The Stages of implementation completion (SIC). Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-116 .
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-116
pubmed: 21974914
pmcid: 3197550
Finley EP, Huynh AK, Farmer MM, Bean-Mayberry B, Moin T, Oishi SM, et al. Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y .
doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y
pubmed: 30482159
pmcid: 6258449
Cohen DJ, Leviton LC, Isaacson N, Tallia AF, Crabtree BF. Online Diaries for Qualitative Evaluation: Gaining Real-Time Insights. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):163–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006288448 .
doi: 10.1177/1098214006288448
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
pubmed: 18929686
Mielke J, De Geest S, Zúñiga F, Brunkert T, Zullig LL, Pfadenhauer LM, et al. Understanding dynamic complexity in context-Enriching contextual analysis in implementation science from a constructivist perspective. Front Health Serv. 2022;2: 953731. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.953731 .
doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.953731
pubmed: 36925847
pmcid: 10012673
Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 2014.
Simmons R, Shiffman J. Scaling up health service innovations: a framework for action. In: Simmons R, Fajans P, Ghiron L, editors. Scaling up health service delivery: from pilot innovations to policies and programmes. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. p. 1–30.
Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
pubmed: 24047204
pmcid: 3848812
Holtrop JS, Gurfinkel D, Nederveld A, Phimphasone-Brady P, Hosokawa P, Rubinson C, et al. Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3
pubmed: 35906602
pmcid: 9335955
Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1989;11(3):255–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163620 .
doi: 10.2307/1163620
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE; 2018.
Charmaz K, Thornberg R. The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qual Res Psychol. 2020;18:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357 .
doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
Salvati ZM, Rahm AK, Williams MS, Ladd I, Schlieder V, Atondo J, et al. A picture is worth a thousand words: advancing the use of visualization tools in implementation science through process mapping and matrix heat mapping. Implementation Science Communications. 2023;4(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00424-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00424-4
pubmed: 37098602
pmcid: 10127322
Kim B, Cruden G, Crable EL, Quanbeck A, Mittman BS, Wagner AD. A structured approach to applying systems analysis methods for examining implementation mechanisms. Implementation Science Communications. 2023;4(1):127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00504-5 .
doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00504-5
pubmed: 37858215
pmcid: 10588196
Glegg SMN, Jenkins E, Kothari A. How the study of networks informs knowledge translation and implementation: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0879-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0879-1
pubmed: 30917844
pmcid: 6437864
Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1
pubmed: 25889199
pmcid: 4328074
Dobson AJ, Barnett AG. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. 4th ed. New York: CRC Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315182780 .
doi: 10.1201/9781315182780
Hartfiel N, Edwards RT. Cost–consequence analysis of public health interventions. In: Edwards RT, McIntosh E, editors. Applied Health Economics for Public Health Practice and Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198737483.003.0010 .
Donovan T, Abell A, McPhail S, Carter H. Development of Cost-IS (costing implementation strategies) instrument for digital health solutions: a modified e-Delphi study. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4229774/v1 . Accessed 12 Jul 2024.
Mates in Mining: Mates in Construction (website). Available from: https://mates.org.au/mining/research . Accessed 12 July 2024.
Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, Macaulay AC, Greenhalgh T, Wong G, et al. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):725. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1
pubmed: 26223523
pmcid: 4520009
Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S40–6. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2009.184036 .
doi: 10.2105/ajph.2009.184036
pubmed: 20147663
Rush KL, Singh S, Seaton CL, Burton L, Li E, Jones C, et al. Telehealth Use for Enhancing the Health of Rural Older Adults: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review. Gerontologist. 2022;62(10):e564–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab141 .
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab141
pubmed: 34661675
Snoswell CL, Chelberg G, De Guzman KR, Haydon HH, Thomas EE, Caffery LJ, et al. The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(9):669–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x211022907 .
doi: 10.1177/1357633x211022907
pubmed: 34184580
Iorfino F, Occhipinti J-A, Skinner A, Davenport T, Rowe S, Prodan A, et al. The Impact of Technology-Enabled Care Coordination in a Complex Mental Health System: A Local System Dynamics Model. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e25331-e. https://doi.org/10.2196/25331 .
doi: 10.2196/25331
NMHC. National Mental Health Commission (NMHC) AG. National Mental Health Commission Vision 2030. 2022.
Fitzpatrick SJ, Handley T, Powell N, Read D, Inder KJ, Perkins D, et al. Suicide in rural Australia: A retrospective study of mental health problems, health-seeking and service utilisation. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7): e0245271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245271 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245271
pubmed: 34288909
pmcid: 8294514
Fisher OJ, McGrath K, Grogan C, Cockshaw W, Leggatt-Cook C. Care navigation addresses issues of tele-mental health acceptability and uptake in rural and remote Australian communities. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(4): e0298655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298655 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298655
pubmed: 38574110
pmcid: 10994303
Stockton DA, Fowler C, Debono D, Travaglia J. World Health Organization building blocks in rural community health services: An integrative review. Health Sci Rep. 2021;4(2): e254. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.254 .
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.254
pubmed: 33732894
pmcid: 7942400
WHO. Everybody business : strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes : WHO’s framework for action. Geneve, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services; 2007. p. 44 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/everybody-s-business----strengthening-health-systems-to-improve-health-outcomes .
Xie CX, Sun L, Ingram E, De Simoni A, Eldridge S, Pinnock H, et al. Use of routine healthcare data in randomised implementation trials: a methodological mixed-methods systematic review. Implement Sci. 2023;18(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01300-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01300-4
pubmed: 37784099
pmcid: 10544368
Garland AF, Kruse M, Aarons GA. Clinicians and outcome measurement: What’s the use? J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003;30(4):393–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287427 .
doi: 10.1007/BF02287427
pubmed: 14593663