Economic Evaluation of Population-Based BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing in Canada.
Humans
Female
Canada
/ epidemiology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Breast Neoplasms
/ genetics
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ genetics
Middle Aged
Adult
Genetic Testing
/ economics
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
BRCA2 Protein
/ genetics
Markov Chains
BRCA1 Protein
/ genetics
Early Detection of Cancer
/ economics
Aged
Genes, BRCA2
Genes, BRCA1
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Sep 2024
03 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline:
12
9
2024
pubmed:
12
9
2024
entrez:
12
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Population-based BRCA testing can identify many more BRCA carriers who will be missed by the current practice of BRCA testing based on family history (FH) and clinical criteria. These carriers can benefit from screening and prevention, potentially preventing many more breast and ovarian cancers and deaths than the current practice. To estimate the incremental lifetime health outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness associated with population-based BRCA testing compared with FH-based testing in Canada. For this economic evaluation, a Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing for all general population women aged 30 years compared with FH-based testing. BRCA carriers are offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy to reduce their ovarian cancer risk and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography screening, medical prevention, and risk-reducing mastectomy to reduce their breast cancer risk. The analyses were conducted from both payer and societal perspectives. This study was conducted from October 1, 2022, to February 20, 2024. Outcomes of interest were ovarian cancer, breast cancer, additional heart disease deaths, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ICER per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). One-way and probabilistic-sensitivity-analyses (PSA) were undertaken to explore the uncertainty. In the simulated cohort of 1 000 000 women aged 30 years in Canada, the base case ICERs of population-based BRCA testing were CAD $32 276 (US $23 402.84) per QALY from the payer perspective or CAD $16 416 (US $11 903.00) per QALY from the societal perspective compared with FH-based testing, well below the established Canadian cost-effectiveness thresholds. Population testing remained cost-effective for ages 40 to 60 years but not at age 70 years. The results were robust for multiple scenarios, 1-way sensitivity, and PSA. More than 99% of simulations from payer and societal perspectives were cost-effective on PSA (5000 simulations) at the CAD $50 000 (US $36 254.25) per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. Population-based BRCA testing could potentially prevent an additional 2555 breast cancers and 485 ovarian cancers in the Canadian population, corresponding to averting 196 breast cancer deaths and 163 ovarian cancer deaths per 1 000 000 population. In this economic evaluation, population-based BRCA testing was cost-effective compared with FH-based testing in Canada from payer and societal perspectives. These findings suggest that changing the genetic testing paradigm to population-based testing could prevent thousands of breast and ovarian cancers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39264630
pii: 2823637
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32725
doi:
Substances chimiques
BRCA1 protein, human
0
BRCA2 Protein
0
BRCA2 protein, human
0
BRCA1 Protein
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM