Usability Evaluation Methods Used in Electronic Discharge Summaries: Literature Review.

adoption digital health discharge summary electronic electronic discharge summaries end users evaluation heuristic evaluation heuristics, think-aloud usability usability testing user-centered

Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 07 12 2023
accepted: 30 06 2024
revised: 17 05 2024
medline: 12 9 2024
pubmed: 12 9 2024
entrez: 12 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

With the widespread adoption of digital health records, including electronic discharge summaries (eDS), it is important to assess their usability in order to understand whether they meet the needs of the end users. While there are established approaches for evaluating the usability of electronic health records, there is a lack of knowledge regarding suitable evaluation methods specifically for eDS. This literature review aims to identify the usability evaluation approaches used in eDS. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, MEDLINE, and ProQuest databases from their inception until July 2023. The study information was extracted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We included studies that assessed the usability of eDS, and the systems used to display eDS. A total of 12 records, including 11 studies and 1 thesis, met the inclusion criteria. The included studies used qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods approaches and reported the use of various usability evaluation methods. Heuristic evaluation was the most used method to assess the usability of eDS systems (n=7), followed by the think-aloud approach (n=5) and laboratory testing (n=3). These methods were used either individually or in combination with usability questionnaires (n=3) and qualitative semistructured interviews (n=4) for evaluating eDS usability issues. The evaluation processes incorporated usability metrics such as user performance, satisfaction, efficiency, and impact rating. There are a limited number of studies focusing on usability evaluations of eDS. The identified studies used expert-based and user-centered approaches, which can be used either individually or in combination to identify usability issues. However, further research is needed to determine the most appropriate evaluation method which can assess the fitness for purpose of discharge summaries.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
With the widespread adoption of digital health records, including electronic discharge summaries (eDS), it is important to assess their usability in order to understand whether they meet the needs of the end users. While there are established approaches for evaluating the usability of electronic health records, there is a lack of knowledge regarding suitable evaluation methods specifically for eDS.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This literature review aims to identify the usability evaluation approaches used in eDS.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, MEDLINE, and ProQuest databases from their inception until July 2023. The study information was extracted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We included studies that assessed the usability of eDS, and the systems used to display eDS.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 12 records, including 11 studies and 1 thesis, met the inclusion criteria. The included studies used qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods approaches and reported the use of various usability evaluation methods. Heuristic evaluation was the most used method to assess the usability of eDS systems (n=7), followed by the think-aloud approach (n=5) and laboratory testing (n=3). These methods were used either individually or in combination with usability questionnaires (n=3) and qualitative semistructured interviews (n=4) for evaluating eDS usability issues. The evaluation processes incorporated usability metrics such as user performance, satisfaction, efficiency, and impact rating.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
There are a limited number of studies focusing on usability evaluations of eDS. The identified studies used expert-based and user-centered approaches, which can be used either individually or in combination to identify usability issues. However, further research is needed to determine the most appropriate evaluation method which can assess the fitness for purpose of discharge summaries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39264712
pii: v26i1e55247
doi: 10.2196/55247
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e55247

Informations de copyright

©Wubshet Tesfaye, Margaret Jordan, Timothy F Chen, Ronald Lynel Castelino, Kamal Sud, Racha Dabliz, Parisa Aslani. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 12.09.2024.

Auteurs

Wubshet Tesfaye (W)

The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Queensland School of Pharmacy, Brisbane, Australia.

Margaret Jordan (M)

The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.

Timothy F Chen (TF)

The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.

Ronald Lynel Castelino (RL)

The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.

Kamal Sud (K)

The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia.
Nepean Kidney Research Centre, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Racha Dabliz (R)

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, Australia.

Parisa Aslani (P)

The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH