A meta analysis of the lateral decubitus position and prone position percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Lateral decubitus positio
Meta-analysis
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Prone position
Journal
BMC urology
ISSN: 1471-2490
Titre abrégé: BMC Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Sep 2024
14 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
28
04
2024
accepted:
26
08
2024
medline:
15
9
2024
pubmed:
15
9
2024
entrez:
14
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objective To analyzed the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in lateral decubitus position and prone position for upper ureteral calculi. Methods Databases including PubMed, Springer, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, CNKI, CSPD and VIP were searched for clinical controlled studies involved with lateral decubitus position and prone position PCNL from their establishment to November 2023.Studies were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. the dates were compared by Review Manager 5.4 software. Results seven studies were eligible, including 807 cases. The Meta-analysis showed that, blood loss and perioperative complication rate of lateral decubitus position PCNL group were significantly different from those of the prone position PCNL group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding hospital time, operative time, channel establishment time and stone-free rate (P>0.05).Conclusions The lateral decubitus position can reduce blood loss and perioperative complication rate. The lateral decubitus position PCNL is safe and effective for upper ureteral calculi which was deserved clinical popularizing use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39277711
doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01583-9
pii: 10.1186/s12894-024-01583-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
202Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Liu Ya-qiong, et al. Nursing observations of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with local anesthesia in the lateral decubitus and prone positions for stone removal. Chongqing Med. 2013;42:2685–6.
Wang Xing-yuan, et al. The efficacy of the lateral decubitus position in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with renal stones by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Chin J Gerontol. 2018;38:2394–6.
Qing-ze MENG et al. Therapeutic efficacy of lateral and prone positions in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones. J Mod Urol 24.02(2019):110–3.
Rong-sheng H et al. Analysis on the impact of lateral position on the treatment effect of Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy for Renal Calculi. Clin Med Eng 27.10(2020):1291–2.
Karami H, Rezaei A, Mohammadhosseini M, Javanmard B, Mazloomfard M, Lotfi B. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position: a comparative study. J Endourol. 2010;24(8):1357-61. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0099 . PMID: 20618100.
Karami H, Mohammadi R, Lotfi B. A study on comparative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone, supine, and flank positions. World J Urol. 2013;31(5):1225–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0889-y . Epub 2012 Jun 13. PMID: 22692449.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0889-y
pubmed: 22692449
Radfar MH, Nasiri M, Shemshaki H, Sarhangnejad R, Dadpour M. A study on comparative outcomes of totally ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone versus flank position: a randomized clinical trial. World J Urol. 2021;39(11):4241–4246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03744-z . Epub 2021 Jun 3. PMID: 34085117.
Zhao Z, Fan J, Liu Y et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: position, position, position[J]! Urolithiasis,2018;46(1):79–86.
Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, et al. Supine versusprone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report fromthe clinical research office of the endourological society percutane-ous nephrolithotomy global study[J]. J Endourol. 2011;25(10):1619–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0110 .
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0110
pubmed: 21877911
Mazzucchi E, Vicentini FC, Marchini GS et al. Percutaneousnephrolithotomy in obese patients: comparison between the proneand total supine position[J]. J Endourol, 2012,26(11):1437–1442. https://doi.org/10.1089/end . 2012.0257.
Dagülli Mansur, Sancaktutar AA, Dede O, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an effective treatment for kidney stones in infants under 1year of age. A single-center experience[J]. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):507–12.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0787-z
EI-Husseiny T, Moraitis K, Maan Z, et al. Percutaneous endourologic procedure in high-risk patients in the lateral decubitus position under regional anesthesia[J]. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1603–6.
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.1525
Gu Xian-, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with B ultrasound-guided renal access in the lateral decubitus flank position for complexrenal calculi [J]. Chin J Urol. 2010;1(3):169–71.
Chen Jia-bi, Li et al. Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and security of flexible ureteroscope lithtripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of patients with renal calculus. J Minim Invasive Urol, 5.03(2016):150–3 https://doi.org/10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2016.03.006
Shao Yong-sheng, et al. A comparative study on the Treatment of Renal Calculi Diameter ≤ 3 cm by Ureteroscopic Holmium laser lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Res. 2016;33(8):1525–7.
Meng Dong-dong et al. Analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the lateral decubitus position for the treatment of complex renal calculi.Journal of traditional Chinese Medicine University of Hunan 36.A01 (2016): 481–481.