Metabolomic and transcriptomic basis of photoperiodic response regulation in broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.).
Panicum miliaceum L.
Broomcorn millet
Metabolomics
Photoperiodism
Transcriptomics
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Sep 2024
17 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
06
03
2024
accepted:
09
09
2024
medline:
18
9
2024
pubmed:
18
9
2024
entrez:
17
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To elucidate the mechanisms underlying photoperiodic responses, we investigated the genomic and metabolomic responses of two broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes. For this purpose, light-insensitive (D32) and light-sensitive (M51) genotypes were exposed to a 16 h photoperiod (long-day (LD) conditions) and an 8 h photoperiod (short-day (SD) conditions), and various transcriptomic and metabolomic changes were investigated. A total of 1664, 2564, 13,017, and 15548 DEGs were identified in the SD-D, LD-D, LD-M, and SD-M groups, respectively. Furthermore, 112 common DEGs were identified as well. Interestingly, most DEGs in the different groups were associated with photosynthesis and phenylpropanoid and carotenoid biosynthesis. In addition, 822 metabolites were identified under different treatments. The main metabolites, including L-malic and fumaric acids, were identified in the negative mode, whereas brucine and loperamide were identified in the positive mode. KEGG analysis revealed that the metabolites in the different groups were enriched in the same metabolic pathway of the TCA cycle. Furthermore, in negative mode, the metabolites of M51 were mainly D-glucose, whereas those of D32 were mainly L-malic and fumaric acids. One photoperiod candidate gene (C2845_PM11G01290), annotated as ATP6B, significantly increased the levels of L-malic and fumaric acids. In conclusion, our study provides a theoretical basis for understanding the molecular mechanisms of photoperiodic response regulation and can be used as a reference for marker development and resource identification in Panicum miliaceum L..
Identifiants
pubmed: 39289492
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72568-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-72568-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21720Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Yang, W. D., Shi, J. G. & Wei, Y. W. Modern grain production 50–82 (China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2001).
Zhou, L. J. et al. Effect of density on yield character of proso millet. Liaoning Agricult. Sci. 1, 17–19 (2010).
Han, T. F., Ma, F. M., Wang, J. L. & Wei, S. Photoperiodic effects on the amount and balance of endogenous hormones in soybean leaves. Acta Agron. Sin. 22, 661–667 (1996).
Chory, J. & Wu, D. Weaving the complex web of signal transduction. Plant Physiol. 125, 77–80 (2001).
pubmed: 11154301
pmcid: 1539330
doi: 10.1104/pp.125.1.77
Komeda, Y. Genetic regulation of time to flower in arabidopsis Thaliana. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 521–535 (2004).
pubmed: 15377230
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141644
Zhang, Y. N., Zhou, Y. P., Chen, Q. H., Huang, X. L. & Tian, C. E. Molecular basis of flowering time regulation in arabidopsis. Chin. Bull. Botany. 49, 469–482 (2014).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1259.2014.00469
Wang, H. B. et al. Advances in molecular mechanisms of photoperiod regulation of rice heading date. North Rice. 50, 75–79 (2020).
Yano, M. et al. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell. 12, 2473–2484 (2000).
pubmed: 11148291
pmcid: 102231
doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2473
Shibaya, T. et al. Genetic interaction involved in the inhibition of heading by heading date QTL, Hd2 in rice under long-day conditions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 1133–1143 (2011).
pubmed: 21789706
doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1654-0
Liu, T. M., Liu, H. Y., Zhang, H. & Xing, Y. Z. Validation and characterization of Ghd7.1, a major quantitative trait locus with pleiotropic effects on spikelets per panicle, plant height, and heading date in rice(Oryza sativa L.). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 55, 917–927 (2013).
pubmed: 23692054
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12070
Kojima, S. et al. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under shortday conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 1096–1105 (2002).
pubmed: 12407188
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcf156
Komiya, R., Ikegami, A., Tamaki, S., Yokoi, S. & Shimamoto, K. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice. Development. 135, 767–774 (2008).
pubmed: 18223202
doi: 10.1242/dev.008631
Xue, W. et al. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat. Genet. 40, 761–767 (2008).
pubmed: 18454147
doi: 10.1038/ng.143
Fujino, K., Yamanouchi, U. & Yano, M. Roles of the Hd5 gene controlling heading date for adaptation to the northern limits of rice cultivation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 611–618 (2013).
pubmed: 23090144
doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-2005-5
Dai, X., Ding, Y., Tan, L., Fu, Y. & Liu, F. LHD1, an allele of DTH8/Ghd8, controls late heading date in common wild rice(Oryza rufipogon). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 54, 790–799 (2012).
pubmed: 22963226
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01166.x
Takahashi, Y., Shomura, A., Sasaki, T. & Yano, M. Hd6, a rice quantitative trait locus involved in photoperiod sensitivity, encodes the alpha subunit of protein kinase CK2. PNAS. 98, 7922–7927 (2001).
pubmed: 11416158
pmcid: 35444
doi: 10.1073/pnas.111136798
Doi, K. et al. Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers shortday promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Gene Dev. 18, 926–936 (2004).
pubmed: 15078816
pmcid: 395851
doi: 10.1101/gad.1189604
Hori, K. et al. Hd16, a gene for casein kinase I, is involved in the control of rice flowering time by modulating the day-length response. Plant J. 76, 36–46 (2013).
pubmed: 23789941
pmcid: 4223384
doi: 10.1111/tpj.12268
Matsubara, K. et al. Natural variation in Hd17, a homolog of Arabidopsis ELF3 that is involved in rice photoperiodic flowering. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 709–716 (2012).
pubmed: 22399582
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs028
Matsubara, K. et al. Ehd2, a rice ortholog of the maize INDETERMINATE1 gene, promotes flowering by up-regulating Ehd1. Plant Physiol. 148, 1425–1435 (2008).
pubmed: 18790997
pmcid: 2577255
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.125542
Matsubara, K., Yamanouchi, U., Nonoue, Y., Sugimoto, K. & Yno, M. Ehd3, encoding a plant homeodomain finger-containing protein, is a critical promoter of rice flowering. Plant J. 66, 603–612 (2011).
pubmed: 21284756
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04517.x
Gao, H. et al. Ehd4 encodes a novel and Oryza-Genus-Specific regulator of photoperiodic flowering in rice. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003281 (2013).
pubmed: 23437005
pmcid: 3578780
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003281
Wu, W., Zheng, X. M., Lu, G., Zhong, Z. & Gao, H. Association of functional nucleotide polymorphisms at DTH2 with the northward expansion of rice cultivation in Asia. PNAS. 110, 2775–2780 (2013).
pubmed: 23388640
pmcid: 3581972
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213962110
Zhu, Y., Peng, Z. Y., Zhang, B. & Bi, Y. P. Advances in function research of PEBP family genes in plants. Shandong Agricult. Sci. 45, 139–145 (2013).
Takahashi, Y. & Shimamoto, K. Heading date 1 (Hd1), an ortholog of Arabidopsis CONSTANS, is a possible target of human selection during domestication to diversify flowering times of cultivated rice. Genes Genet. Syst. 86, 175–182 (2011).
pubmed: 21952207
doi: 10.1266/ggs.86.175
Lee, Y. S. & An, G. OsGI controls flowering time by modulating rhythmic flowering time regulators preferentially under short day in rice. J. Plant. Biol. 58, 137–145 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s12374-015-0007-y
Zheng, T. et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of Ghd7 protein stability by phytochrome and OsGI in photoperiodic control of flowering in rice. New Phytol. 224, 306–320 (2019).
pubmed: 31225911
doi: 10.1111/nph.16010
Zhao, J. M. et al. OsELF3-1, an ortholog of Arabidopsis early flowering 3, regulates rice circadian rhythm and photoperiodic flowering. PLoS One. 7, e43705 (2012).
pubmed: 22912900
pmcid: 3422346
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043705
Chen, S. L. et al. Interactive effects of Multiple vernalization(Vrn-1)-and photoperiod(Ppd-1)-related genes on the growth habit of bread wheat and their association with heading and flowering time. BMC Plant Biol. 18, 374 (2018).
pubmed: 30587132
pmcid: 6307265
doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1587-8
Turner, A., Beales, J., Faure, S., Dunford, R. P. & Laurie, D. A. The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science. 310, 1031–1034 (2005).
pubmed: 16284181
doi: 10.1126/science.1117619
Murphy, R. L. et al. Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37(PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. PNAS 108, 16469–16474 (2011).
pubmed: 21930910
pmcid: 3182727
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106212108
Jia, X. P. et al. Responsive features of SiPRR37 to photoperiod and temperature, abiotic stress and identification of its favourable allelic variations in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Acta Agronomica Sinica. 47, 638–649 (2021).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04139
Nakamichi, N. et al. Flowering time control in rice by introducing Arabidopsis clock-associated PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 5. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 3, 970–979 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/09168451.2020.1719822
Xia, Z. et al. Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering. PNAS 109, 2155–2164 (2012).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117982109
Xu, M., Yamagishi, N., Chen, Z., Takeshima, R. & Abe, J. Soybean-specific E1 family of floral repressors controls night-break responses through down-regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T orthologs. Plant Physiol. 1, 763 (2015).
Kong, F., Liu, B., Xia, Z., Sato, S. & Bo, M. K. Two coordinately regulated homologs of FLOWERING LOCUS T are involved in the control of photoperiodic flowering in soybea. Plant Physiol. 154, 1220–1231 (2010).
pubmed: 20864544
pmcid: 2971601
doi: 10.1104/pp.110.160796
Naoya, F. M., Yoshida, H. & Kusano, M. Effects of light quality, photoperiod, CO concentration, and air temperature on chlorogenic acid and rutin accumulation in young lettuce plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 186, 290–298 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.07.010
Shimizu, S., Yamauchi, Y. & Ishikawa, A. Photoperiod Following Inoculation of Arabidopsis with Pyricularia oryzae (syn. Magnaporthe oryzae) Influences on the Plant-Pathogen Interaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 5004 (2021).
pubmed: 34066846
pmcid: 8125946
doi: 10.3390/ijms22095004
Su, P. F. et al. Plant morphology, secondary metabolites and chlorophyll fluorescence of Artemisia argyi under different LED environments. Photosynth. Res. 19, 1–12 (2023).
Liu, H. et al. The influence of light-emitting diodes on the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities in pea sprouts. J. Funct. Foods. 25, 459–465 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.06.028
Li, C. X. et al. An RNA-seq analysis of grape plantlets grown in vitro reveals different responses to blue, green, red LED light, and white fluorescent light. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 78 (2017).
pubmed: 28197159
pmcid: 5281588
Appolloni, E. et al. Potential application of pre-harvest LED interlighting to improve tomato quality and storability. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 195, 112113 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112113
Ma, Q. et al. Widely targeted metabolomic analysis revealed the effects of alkaline stress on nonvolatile and volatile metabolites in broomcorn millet grains. Food Res. Int. 171, 113066 (2023).
pubmed: 37330826
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113066
Yang, H. Y. et al. The mechanism of gibberellins treatment suppressing kiwifruit postharvest ripening processes by transcriptome analysis. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 198, 112223 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112223
Jiu, S. T. et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying the action of strigolactones involved in grapevine root development by interacting with other phytohormone signaling. Sci. Hortic. 293, 110709 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110709
Liu, X. J. et al. Strigolactones modulate stem length and diameter of cherry rootstocks through interaction with other hormone signaling pathways. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1092654 (2023).
pubmed: 36844087
pmcid: 9948674
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1092654
Wang, W. T. et al. Characterization of metabolite landscape distinguishes wild from cultivated Polygonati Rhizomes by UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS untargeted metabolomics. Food Biosci. 53, 102574 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102574
An, M. J. et al. Polymer amendment regulates cadmium migration in cadmium contaminated cotton field: Insights from genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. Sci. Total Environ. 807, 151075 (2022).
pubmed: 34687702
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151075
Wang, J. C. et al. Comparative cytology combined with transcriptomic and metabolomics analyses of Solanum nigrum L. in response to Cd toxicity. J Hazard Mater. 23, 127168 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127168
Cavill, R., Jennen, D., Kleinjans, J. & Bried, J. J. Transcriptomic and metabolomic data integration. Brief Bioinform. 17, 891–901 (2016).
pubmed: 26467821
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbv090
Livak, K. J. & SchmittgenT, D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2
pubmed: 11846609
doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Wang, J. J. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of photoperiod sensitivity based on different traits of broomcorn millet. Sci. Agricult. Sinica. 53, 474–485 (2020).
Yan, J. D. et al. Analysis of Camellia oleifera transcriptome reveals key pathways and hub genes involved during different photoperiods. BMC Plant Biol. 22, 435 (2022).
pubmed: 36089577
pmcid: 9465947
doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03798-0
Dong, W. X., Li, D. X., Zhang, L., Yin, B. Z. & Zhang, Y. C. Transcriptome Analysis of Short-Day Photoperiod Inducement in Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis L.) Based on RNA-Seq. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 893245 (2022).
pubmed: 35845693
pmcid: 9280645
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.893245
Sapey, E. et al. Transcriptome profile of a long-juvenile soybean genotype huaxia-3 under short and long photoperiod. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 40, 1–13 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11105-021-01332-4
Qiu, L. L. et al. Photoperiod genes contribute to daylength-sensing and breeding in rice. Plants 12, 899 (2023).
pubmed: 36840246
pmcid: 9959395
doi: 10.3390/plants12040899
Zhang, Y. & Fernie, A. R. On the role of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in plant productivity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 60, 1199–1216 (2018).
pubmed: 29917310
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12690
Liu, Y. et al. Identification and characterization of the TCA cycle genes in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 592 (2019).
pubmed: 31881988
pmcid: 6935159
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2213-0
Jänkänpää, H. J., Mishra, Y., Schröder, W. P. & Jansson, S. Metabolic profiling reveals metabolic shifts in Arabidopsis plants grown under different light conditions. Plant Cell. Environ. 35, 1824–1836 (2012).
pubmed: 22497620
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02519.x
Rudrappa, T., Czymmek, K. J., Paré, P. W. & Bais, H. P. Root-secreted malic acid recruits beneficial soil bacteria. Plant Physiol. 148, 1547–1556 (2008).
pubmed: 18820082
pmcid: 2577262
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.127613
Chia, D. W., Yoder, T. J., Reiter, W. D. & Gibson, S. I. Fumaric acid: an overlooked form of fixed carbon in Arabidopsis and other plant species. Planta 211, 743–751 (2000).
pubmed: 11089689
doi: 10.1007/s004250000345
Lu, L. et al. Brucine: A Review of Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Toxicology. Front Pharmacol. 11, 377 (2020).
pubmed: 32308621
pmcid: 7145893
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00377
Kim, J. E. et al. Antioxidant activity and laxative effects of tannin-enriched extract of Ecklonia cava in loperamide-induced constipation of SD rats. PLoS One. 16, e0246363 (2021).
pubmed: 33626068
pmcid: 7904174
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246363
Zhou, J.J. Combined omics analysis reveals the transmission and intervarieties metabolic differences in rice rhythms. Doctoral Thesis of Hainan University. 48–76 (2022).
Krishnaiah, S. Y. et al. Clock regulation of metabolites reveals coupling between transcription and metabolism. Cell Metab. 25, 1206–1206 (2017).
pubmed: 28467936
doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.023
Robles, M. S., Cox, J. & Mann, M. In-vivo quantitative proteomics reveals a key contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms to the circadian regulation of liver metabolism. PLoS Genetics. 10, e1004047 (2014).
pubmed: 24391516
pmcid: 3879213
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004047
Scheibe, R. Maintaining homeostasis by controlled alternatives for energy distribution in plant cells under changing conditions of supply and demand. Photosynth Res. 139, 81–91 (2019).
pubmed: 30203365
doi: 10.1007/s11120-018-0583-z
Sun, J. et al. Extracellular ATP signaling and homeostasis in plant cells. Plant Signal. Behav. 7, 566–569 (2012).
pubmed: 22516815
pmcid: 3419021
doi: 10.4161/psb.19857
Cheng, X. et al. Protein changes in response to lead stress of lead-tolerant and lead-sensitive industrial hemp using SWATH technology. Genes 10, 396 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/genes10050396