Response and disease resistance evaluation of sorghum seedlings under anthracnose stress.
Anthracnose (Colletotrichum sublineola)
Cell tissue structure
Disease-resistant genes
Multivariate analysis
Physiological and biochemical indicators
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench)
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Sep 2024
20 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
28
05
2024
accepted:
13
08
2024
medline:
21
9
2024
pubmed:
21
9
2024
entrez:
20
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sorghum is the world's fifth-largest cereal crop, and anthracnose (Colletotrichum sublineola) is the main disease affecting sorghum. However, systematic research on the cellular structure, physiological and biochemical, and genes related to anthracnose resistance and disease resistance evaluation in sorghum is lacking in the field. Upon inoculation with anthracnose (C. sublineola) spores, disease-resistant sorghum (gz93) developed a relative lesion area (RLA) that was significantly smaller than that of the disease-susceptible sorghum (gz234). The leaf thickness, length and profile area of leaf mesophyll cells, upper and lower epidermal cells decreased in the lesion area, with a greater reduction observed in gz234 than in gz93. The damage caused by C. sublineola resulted in a greater decrease in the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) in gz234 than in gz93, with early-stage reduction due to stomatal limitation and late-stage reduction caused by lesions. Overall, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), the content of proline (Pro), abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and gibberellic acid (GA
Identifiants
pubmed: 39304668
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70088-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-70088-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21978Subventions
Organisme : the Talent 532 Base Project of the Organization Department in Guizhou Province, China
ID : Grant number: QRLF(2013)533 no.15) (Grant number: QRLF(2016) no.23) (Grant number: QRLF(2020) no.2
Organisme : special Fund for Revitalization of Top Ten Industries (High-quality Tobacco and Alcohol) Industry in Guizhou Province for 'Research on breeding of New varieties of Sorghum'
ID : Guizhou Finance Industry [2020] No.198
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 32272514 and 32060614
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Lee, S. et al. Broad-spectrum fungal resistance in sorghum is conferred through the complex regulation of an immune receptor gene embedded in a natural antisense transcript. Plant Cell 34, 1641–1665. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab305 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab305
pubmed: 35018449
pmcid: 9048912
Abreha, K. B., Ortiz, R., Carlsson, A. S. & Geleta, M. Understanding the Sorghum-Colletotrichum sublineola Interactions for enhanced host resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 641969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.641969 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.641969
pubmed: 33959139
pmcid: 8093437
Zhang, L. et al. GWAS of grain color and tannin content in Chinese sorghum based on whole-genome sequencing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 136, 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04307-z (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04307-z
pubmed: 36952041
pmcid: 10036430
Felderhoff, J. T., McIntyre, M. L., Saballos, A. & Vermerris, W. Using genotyping by sequencing to map two novel anthracnose resistance loci in Sorghum bicolor. G3 Genes, Genom. Genet. 6(7), 1935–1946. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.030510 (2016).
doi: 10.1534/g3.116.030510
Stutts, L. R. & Vermerris, W. Elucidating anthracnose resistance mechanisms in sorghum—a review. Phytopathology® 110, 1863–1876. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-04-20-0132-rvw (2020).
doi: 10.1094/phyto-04-20-0132-rvw
pubmed: 33100146
Mengistu, G., Shimelis, H., Laing, M. & Lule, D. Breeding for anthracnose (Colletotrichum sublineolum Henn.) resistance in sorghum: Challenges and opportunities. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 12, 1911–1920. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.18.12.12.p1230 (2018).
doi: 10.21475/ajcs.18.12.12.p1230
Koima, I. N., Kilalo, D. C., Orek, C. O., Wagacha, J. M. & Nyaboga, E. N. Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species causing sorghum anthracnose in Kenya and screening of sorghum germplasm for resistance to anthracnose. J. Fungi 9, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010100 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/jof9010100
Basavaraju, P., Shetty, N. P., Shetty, H. S., de Neergaard, E. & Jørgensen, H. J. L. Infection biology and defence responses in sorghum against Colletotrichum sublineolum. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107, 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04234.x (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04234.x
pubmed: 19302494
Zhang, Y. J., Chen, J. Y., Li, R. & Dai, X. F. Recent advances in physiological and biochemical mechanisms of cotton resistance to Verticillium wilt. Plant Prot. 50, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.16688/j.zwbh.2023097 (2024).
doi: 10.16688/j.zwbh.2023097
Li, Y. et al. Digital gene expression analysis of the response to Ralstonia solanacearum between resistant and susceptible tobacco varieties. Sci. Rep. 11, 3887. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82576-8 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82576-8
pubmed: 33594109
pmcid: 7886896
He, S. X. Mapping of Bacterial Leaf Streak Resistance Gene and Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Response to Pathogenic Bacteria Infection in Rice (Guang Xi University, 2020).
Zhao, S. Q. et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of Maize to gray leaf spot stress. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sinica 37, 190–197 (2022).
Liu, Z. H. et al. Study on the stem cell structure alteration of sweet potato varieties with different resistance to Fusarium wilt. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 16, 541–548. https://doi.org/10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2015.03.016 (2015).
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2015.03.016
Shi, J. et al. drought tolerance analysis and identification index screening of different spring wheat varieties. Agric. Res. Arid Areas 41, 8–16+63 (2023).
Tashakorizadeh, M., Golkar, P., Vahabi, M. R. & Ghorbanpour, M. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of grain yield loss in fumitory (Fumaria parviflora Lam.) exposed to copper and drought stress. Sci. Rep. 13, 17934. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45103-5 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45103-5
pubmed: 37863928
pmcid: 10589251
Wu, Z. et al. Metabolic mechanism of plant defense against rice blast induced by probenazole. Metabolites 11, 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11040246 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/metabo11040246
pubmed: 33923492
pmcid: 8073365
Sarabi, B. & Ghashghaie, J. Evaluating the physiological and biochemical responses of melon plants to NaCl salinity stress using supervised and unsupervised statistical analysis. Plant Stress 4, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2022.100067 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2022.100067
Liu, F. et al. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of Gleditsia sinensis seedlings under drought-rehydration state. Sci. Rep. 13, 19963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45394-8 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45394-8
pubmed: 37968307
pmcid: 10651932
Ten, L. P., Yu, L. & Gao, J. Study on the important epidemiological stages of sorghum anthracnose: I. Spore germination infection, incubation period, symptom manifestation, and lesion expansion. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 39, 128–131. https://doi.org/10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2011.03.095 (2011).
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2011.03.095
Li, Y. & TeBeest, D. O. Temporal and spatial development of sorghum anthracnose in Arkansas. Plant Dis. 93, 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-3-0287 (2009).
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-3-0287
pubmed: 30764185
Moore, J. W., Ditmore, M. & TeBeest, D. O. Pathotypes of Colletotrichum sublineolum in Arkansas. Plant Dis. 92, 1415–1420. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-10-1415 (2008).
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-92-10-1415
pubmed: 30769577
Motlhaodi, T. et al. Genetic diversity in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm from Southern Africa as revealed by microsatellite markers and agro-morphological traits. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 64, 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0388-x (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s10722-016-0388-x
Afolayan, G. et al. Genetic diversity assessment of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) accessions using single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Plant Genet. Resour. Charact. Util. 17, 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479262119000212 (2019).
doi: 10.1017/s1479262119000212
Xu, J., Jiang, Y., Hu, L., Liu, K. J. & Xu, X. D. Evaluation of sorghum accessions resistance against Colletotrichum sublineolum and relationship between severity and yield loss on sorghum. Sci. Agric. Sin. 52, 4079–4087 (2019).
Casa, A. M. et al. Community resources and strategies for association mapping in sorghum. Crop Sci. 48, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0080 (2008).
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0080
Cuevas, H. E., Prom, L. K., Cooper, E. A., Knoll, J. E. & Ni, X. Genome-wide association mapping of anthracnose (Colletotrichum sublineolum) resistance in the U.S. sorghum association panel. Plant Genom. 11, 170099. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2017.11.0099 (2018).
doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2017.11.0099
Mewa, D. B. et al. ANTHRACNOSE RESISTANCE GENE2 confers fungal resistance in sorghum. Plant J. 113(2), 308–326 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/tpj.16048
pubmed: 36441009
Wang, X. et al. Systemic regulation of anatomic structure and photosynthetic characteristics of developing leaves in sorghum seedlings under salt stress. Acta Agron. Sin. 36, 1941–1949 (2010).
Graham, D. F. & Thomas, D. S. Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis (Australian National University, 1982).
Evans, J. R. Improving photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 162, 1780–1793. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.219006 (2013).
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.219006
pubmed: 23812345
pmcid: 3729760
Chen, X. L., Zhu, C. C., Zhang, S. J., Lu, X. M. & Chen, Y. Study on photosynthesis of different resistant Chinese walnut varieties under black spot disease stress. North. Hortic. 34–40 (2023).
Lv, J. B. Study on Cytology and Physiological Mechanism of Resistant Tissues to Gray Leaf Spot of Maize (Shenyang Agricultural University, 2019).
Guang, F., Zhang, J. Y., Shi, B. & Wan, X. J. Resistance identification to Fusarium wilt and difference in physiological response under stress of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. momordicae in bitter gourd. Plant Physiol. J. 55, 1481–1488. https://doi.org/10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2019.0234 (2019).
doi: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2019.0234
Li, X. H. Research on the Physiological and Molecular Mechanism of Tobacco Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita (Henan Agricultural University, 2019).
Sabra, A. M. S. <Physiological and biochemical responses of three Echinacea species to salinity stress.pdf>.
Zhang, H. et al. Differential responses of Chrysanthemum morifolium varieties to Fusarium infection and synthetic evaluation of resistance. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 51, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.13926/j.cnki.apps.000356 (2021).
doi: 10.13926/j.cnki.apps.000356
Vendruscolo, E. C. G. et al. Stress-induced synthesis of proline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 164, 1367–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.001 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.001
pubmed: 17604875
Wei, L., Wang, W. W., Li, X. Y., Yu, D. Y. & Liu, L. J. Physiological differences in soybean resistance to Pythium root rot. Soybean Sci. 36, 425–429 (2017).
Han, Y. Q. et al. Physiological, biochemical and gene expression analysis of foxtail millet against infection of Sclerospora graminicola. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 50, 657–665. https://doi.org/10.13926/j.cnki.apps.000506 (2020).
doi: 10.13926/j.cnki.apps.000506
Wang, Y. et al. Arabidopsis EXTRA-LARGE G PROTEIN 1 (XLG1) functions together with XLG2 and XLG3 in PAMP-triggered MAPK activation and immunity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 65, 825–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13391 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13391
pubmed: 36250681
Zhang, Y. et al. A Nicotiana benthamiana receptor-like kinase regulates Phytophthora resistance by coupling with BAK1 to enhance elicitin-triggered immunity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 65, 1553–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13458 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13458
pubmed: 36661038
Li, W. B. Cloning and Functional Studies of SiSERK1 gene of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) (Northwest Normal University, 2022).
Qi, H. et al. TaRLK-6A promotes Fusarium crown rot resistance in wheat. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 66, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13596 (2024).
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13596
pubmed: 38103031
Wang, K., Xue, J. X., Li, Y. D. & Zhang, M. Y. Hyperspectral study on polyphnol oxidase content of cauliflower at the early stages of gray mold infection. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 44, 534–541 (2024).
Wu, X. L. et al. Comprehensive evaluation and screening identification indexes of shade tolerance at seedling in Soybean. Sci. Agric. Sin. 48, 2497–2507 (2015).
Li, M. et al. Analysis of heat tolerance of wheat with different genotypes and screening of identification indexes in Huang-Huai-Hai region. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 54, 3381–3393 (2021).
Du, X. J. et al. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 355 introduced Japonica rice germplasm resources in Xinjiang. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 29, 13–26 (2024).
Zhang, Y. et al. Establishment of a comprehensive evaluation model for rice seed vigor. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 50, 172–183. https://doi.org/10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2023.12.017 (2023).
doi: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2023.12.017
Liu, X. R., Huang, C. D. & Zhu, H. W. Studies on measuring methods of leaf area in lettuce. China Veg. 1, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.19928/j.cnki.1000-6346.2020.12.015 (2020).
doi: 10.19928/j.cnki.1000-6346.2020.12.015
Li, Y. et al. Simultaneous determination of ten phytohormones in five parts of Sargasum fusiforme (Har.) Seichell by high performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Chin. J. Chromatogr. 32, 863–868 (2014).
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2014.03049
Weng, W. et al. Specific gibberellin 2-oxidase 3 (SbGA2ox3) mutants promote yield and stress tolerance in Sorghum bicolor. Agronomy 13, 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030908 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/agronomy13030908
Schmittgen, T. D. & Livak, K. J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.73 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73
pubmed: 18546601