Short-term outcomes of delta-shaped anastomosis versus functional end-to-end anastomosis using linear staplers for colon cancer.


Journal

Techniques in coloproctology
ISSN: 1128-045X
Titre abrégé: Tech Coloproctol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9613614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 18 05 2024
accepted: 09 08 2024
medline: 23 9 2024
pubmed: 23 9 2024
entrez: 23 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Several methods are used for reconstruction in colon cancer surgery, including hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis. However, few reports have compared short-term outcomes among reconstruction methods. This study compared short-term outcomes between delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta) and functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA). We retrospectively reviewed 1314 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal surgery with FEEA or Delta reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups according to reconstruction by FEEA (F group; n = 1242) or Delta (D group; n = 72). Propensity score matching was applied to minimize the possibility of selection bias and to balance covariates that could affect postoperative complications. Short-term outcomes were compared between groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 215 patients (17.3%) in F group and 8 patients (11.1%) in D group. Before matching, transverse colon cancer was more frequent (p = 0.002), clinical N-positive status was less frequent (44.1% versus 16.7%, p < 0.001), distant metastasis was less frequent (11.7% versus 1.4%, p = 0.003), and laparoscopic approach was more frequent (87.8% versus 100%, p < 0.001) in D group. After matching, no differences in any clinical factor were evident between groups. Blood loss was significantly lower (28 mL versus 10 mL, p = 0.002) in D group, but operation time and postoperative complication rates were similar between groups. Delta and FEEA were both considered safe as reconstruction methods. Further studies are needed to clarify appropriate case selection for Delta and FEEA.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Several methods are used for reconstruction in colon cancer surgery, including hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis. However, few reports have compared short-term outcomes among reconstruction methods. This study compared short-term outcomes between delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta) and functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA).
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 1314 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal surgery with FEEA or Delta reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups according to reconstruction by FEEA (F group; n = 1242) or Delta (D group; n = 72). Propensity score matching was applied to minimize the possibility of selection bias and to balance covariates that could affect postoperative complications. Short-term outcomes were compared between groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
Postoperative complications occurred in 215 patients (17.3%) in F group and 8 patients (11.1%) in D group. Before matching, transverse colon cancer was more frequent (p = 0.002), clinical N-positive status was less frequent (44.1% versus 16.7%, p < 0.001), distant metastasis was less frequent (11.7% versus 1.4%, p = 0.003), and laparoscopic approach was more frequent (87.8% versus 100%, p < 0.001) in D group. After matching, no differences in any clinical factor were evident between groups. Blood loss was significantly lower (28 mL versus 10 mL, p = 0.002) in D group, but operation time and postoperative complication rates were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Delta and FEEA were both considered safe as reconstruction methods. Further studies are needed to clarify appropriate case selection for Delta and FEEA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39311979
doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03006-1
pii: 10.1007/s10151-024-03006-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comparative Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

131

Informations de copyright

© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Références

Ritchey ML, Lally KP, Ostericher R (1993) Comparison of different techniques of stapled bowel anastomoses in a canine model. Arch Surg 128(12):1365–1367
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420240073014 pubmed: 8250710
Meagher AP, Wolff BG (1994) Right hemicolectomy with a linear cutting stapler. Dis Colon Rectum 37(10):1043–1045
doi: 10.1007/BF02049322 pubmed: 7924714
Yamamoto T, Keighley MR (1999) Stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis in Crohn’s disease. Surg Today 29(7):679–681
doi: 10.1007/BF02483001 pubmed: 10452253
Steichen FM (1968) The use of staplers in anatomical side-to-side and functional end-to-end enteroanastomoses. Surgery 64(5):948–953
pubmed: 5687844
Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Revi 9:Cd004320
Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H, Tamaki N, Isobe H, Katayama T et al (2002) Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 195(2):284–287
doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01239-5 pubmed: 12168979
Zhang B, Tu JC, Fang J, Zhou L, Liu YL (2015) Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(6):9967–9972
pubmed: 26309684 pmcid: 4538117
Kanaya S, Kawamura Y, Kawada H, Iwasaki H, Gomi T, Satoh S et al (2011) The delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: analysis of the initial 100 consecutive procedures of intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy. Gastric Cancer 14(4):365–371
doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0054-0 pubmed: 21573920
Emoto S, Fukunaga Y, Nakanishi R, Hirayama K, Nagaoka T, Matsui S et al (2022) Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with extracorporeal anastomosis for transverse colon cancer: comparison of triangulating anastomosis with functional end-to-end anastomosis. Surg Endosc 36(5):3261–3269
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08638-0 pubmed: 34341908
Sato K, Imaizumi K, Kasajima H, Kurushima M, Umehara M, Tsuruga Y et al (2022) Short-term outcomes of extracorporeal colo-colonic triangular anastomosis versus functional end-to-end anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted surgery for left-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(2):747–757
doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02403-6 pubmed: 35034190
Tajima JY, Nagayama S, Hiyoshi Y, Mukai T, Nagasaki T, Yamaguchi T et al (2021) Colonic delta-shaped anastomosis using linear staplers in laparoscopic colectomy. Tech Coloproctol 25(4):473–474
doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02341-3 pubmed: 32914267
Su H, Jin WS, Wang P, Bao M, Wang XW, Liu Q et al (2019) Intra-corporeal delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: a safe and effective technique. Gastroenterology report 7(4):272–278
doi: 10.1093/gastro/goy051 pubmed: 31413834 pmcid: 6688732
Ojima H, Sohda M, Ando H, Sano A, Fukai Y, Ogawa A et al (2015) Relationship between functional end-to-end anastomosis for colon cancer and surgical site infections. Surg Today 45(12):1489–1492
doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1110-x pubmed: 25572433
Goto S, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Uozumi R, Kanemitsu Y, Watanabe T et al (2017) Multicenter analysis of impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term oncologic outcomes after curative resection of colon cancer. Surgery 162(2):317–324
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.005 pubmed: 28433249
Ha GW, Kim JH, Lee MR (2017) Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24(11):3289–3299
doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5881-8 pubmed: 28608118
Predictors for Anastomotic Leak, Postoperative Complications, and Mortality After Right Colectomy for Cancer: Results From an International Snapshot Audit. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(5):606-18.
Zhao L, Wang Y, Liu H, Chen H, Deng H, Yu J et al (2014) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 18(5):1003–1009
doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2462-z pubmed: 24449001

Auteurs

R Ono (R)

Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.

T Tominaga (T)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. tetsuro.tominaga@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.

M Ishii (M)

Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.

M Hisanaga (M)

Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.

M Araki (M)

Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.

Y Sumida (Y)

Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.

T Nonaka (T)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.

S Hashimoto (S)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.

T Shiraishi (T)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.

K Noda (K)

Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.

H Takeshita (H)

Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, 1-1001-1, Omura, Nagasaki, 856-8562, Japan.

H Fukuoka (H)

Department of Surgery, Isahaya General Hospital, 24-1 Isahaya, Nagasaki, 854-8501, Japan.

S Oyama (S)

Department of Surgery, Ureshino Medical Center, 4279-3 Ko, Ureshinomachi, Oaza, Shimojuku, Ureshino, Saga, 843-0393, Japan.

K Ishimaru (K)

Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Nagasaki Hospital, 2-5-1 Katafuchi, Nagasaki, 850-0003, Japan.

T Sawai (T)

Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.

K Matsumoto (K)

Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH