Program Signaling in Emergency Medicine: The 2022-2023 Program Director Experience.
Journal
The western journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1936-9018
Titre abrégé: West J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101476450
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
02
02
2024
revised:
22
04
2024
accepted:
03
06
2024
medline:
25
9
2024
pubmed:
25
9
2024
entrez:
25
9
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Program signaling (PS), which enables residency applicants to signal their preference for a specific program, was introduced in emergency medicine (EM) in the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. In this study we evaluated EM program directors' (PD) utilization of PS in application review and ranking. This study also explores the relationship between program characteristics and number of signals received as well as the relative importance and utilization of signals related to the number of signals received. This is an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study of PDs at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited EM residency programs. We used descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of residency programs and practices around PS. Measures of central tendency and dispersion summarized continuous variables. We used chi-square analysis or the Fisher exact test for comparisons between groups for categorical variables. Comparisons for continuous variables were made using the The response rate was 41% (n = 113/277 EM programs). Most programs participated in PS (n = 261/277 EM programs, 94.2%). Mean number of signals received was 60 (range 2-203). Signals received varied based on program characteristics including geographic location and program type, duration, environment, and longevity. Most used PS in holistic review (52.2%), but other uses varied by proportion of applications that were signaled. The importance of PS in application review (mean 2.9; 1-5 scale, 1 = not important, 5 = extremely important) and rank list preparation (2.1) was relatively low compared to other application elements such as standardized letters of evaluation (4.97 for review, 4.90 for ranking). The study provides insights into PS utilization in EM's inaugural year. We have identified patterns of signal use based on program characteristics and number of signals received that can inform signal allocation and utilization on an individual applicant and program level. A more nuanced understanding of signal use can provide valuable insight as the specialty of EM grapples with fluctuations in its applicant numbers and shifting demographics of its applicant pool.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39319802
doi: 10.5811/westjem.19392
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
715-724Références
AE Pelletier-Bui, BH Schnapp, LG Smith, et al. Making our preference known: preference signaling in the emergency medicine residency application. West J Emerg Med. 2021;23(1):72–5.
Association of American Medical Colleges. ERAS preliminary data as of January 3 each season. 2024. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/media/6231/download?attachment. Accessed April 20, 2024.
N Ramsay. EM match 2020 by the numbers. 2020. Available at: https://www.emra.org/students/newsletter-articles/em-match-2020-by-the-numbers/. Accessed April 20, 2024.
A Pelletier-Bui, E Werley, M Camejo. EMRA hangouts - preference signaling 101. 2022. Available at: https://www.emra.org/be-involved/events--activities/emra-hangouts/20220721-preference-signaling. Accessed April 20, 2024.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Supplemental ERAS® application: guide for residency programs. 2022. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/media/56451/download/. Accessed April 20, 2024.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Supplemental ERAS® 2022–2023 application cycle: evaluation of program signaling. 2023. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/media/64591/download. Accessed April 20, 2024.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Supplemental ERAS® 2022–2023 application cycle: results of the program director reaction survey. 2023. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/media/64996/download. Accessed April 20, 2024.
J LaFemina, IS Rosman, SL Wallach, et al. The relationship between program and applicant characteristics with applicant program signals in the 2022 residency recruitment cycle: findings from 3 specialties. Acad Med. 2024;99(4):430–6.
AE Rosenblatt, J LaFemina, L Sood, et al. Impact of preference signals on interview selection across multiple residency specialties and programs. J Grad Med Educ. 2023;15(6):702–10.
E Banks, AF Winkel, HK Morgan, et al. Program signaling in obstetrics and gynecology residency applications. Obstet Gynecol. 2024;143(2):281–3.
WJ Benjamin, NR Lenze, LA Bohm, et al. Impact of applicants’ characteristics and geographic connections to residency programs on preference signaling outcomes in the match. Acad Med. 2024;99(4):437–44.
AR Sergesketter, E Song, RL Shammas, et al. Preference signaling and the integrated plastic surgery match: a national survey study. J Surg Educ. 2024;81(5):662–70.
KV Suresh, O Covarrubias, F Mun, et al. Preference signaling survey of program directors-after the match. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024;32(5):220–7.
JL Kotlier, AP Mihalic, FA Petrigliano, et al. Understanding the match: the effect of signaling, demographics, and applicant characteristics on match success in the orthopaedic residency application process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024;32(5):e231–9.
F Cai, E Southworth, S Santiago, et al. The golden tickets: impact of preference signaling on obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230(2):262.e1–9.
R Grauer, D Ranti, K Greene, et al. Characterization of applicant preference signals, invitations for interviews, and inclusion on match lists for residency positions in urology [published correction appears in JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(2):e233305]. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(1):e2250974.
CWD Chang, MC Thorne, S Malekzadeh, et al. Two-year interview and match outcomes of otolaryngology preference signaling. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;168(3):377–83.
JS Rodriguez-Alvarez, C Munoz-Lopez, Harwood S Jr., et al. Urology residency applicant selection: program directors’ new criteria. Urology. 2024;S0090–4295(24):00141–9.
DA Dillman. Mail and Internet usrveys: The Tailored Design Method: 2007 with New Internet, Visual and Mixed-Mode Guide. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
American Medical Association. Fellowship and residency electronic interactive database (FREIDA™). Available at: https://freida.ama-assn.org. Accessed April 20, 2024.
Emergency Medicine Residents’ Association (EMRA). EMRA match database. Available at: https://match.emra.org/. Accessed April 20, 2024.
National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2021 NRMP program director survey. 2021. Available at: https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2021-PD-Survey-Report-for-WWW.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2024.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Residency programs participating in program signaling. 2023. Available at: https://students-residents.aamc.org/applying-residencies-eras/residency-programs-participating-program-signaling. Accessed April 20, 2024.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Exploring the relationship between program signaling & interview invitations across specialties: 2024 ERAS preliminary analysis. 2024. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/media/74811/download?attachment. Accessed April 20, 2024.
National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2023 main residency match. 2023. Available at: https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2023-Main-Match-Results-and-Data-Book-FINAL.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2024.